Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 6/4/19

True Populism VS Trumpulism

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   23 comments
Author 513220
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michele Goddard
- Advertisement -

But again this was not true populism in my mind because although the raw emotion was shared among the common people, that emotion had to be stoked, manipulated and molded into an ideology. The emotion was the impetus for the division of the society into castes, but all of the rest of it was top-down branding. Highly effective but not organic.

After the stock-market crash of 1929 and the Great Depression that followed, FDR was elected in a landslide. His message of empathy to the suffering of the American populace resonated where Herbert Hoover's disconnect with this suffering only drew hostility. Hoover thought he could prey on the hard-work ethos and his claims that the Republican management had brought great prosperity, was explicitly in contrast to the real experiences of Americans. Hoover's negligence in the eyes of the people was especially shocking given Hoover's active service feeding the Belgian people trapped in Germany during WWI, where he took hundreds of ships of food to provide humanitarian aid.

Getting back to Trump and his flirtation with the alt-right. Trump does this is because his "base" is not a true populist movement. His election success was the result of a perfect storm. Hillary was a very unpopular candidate and was her own worst enemy during the campaign. Many people felt detached from the political process after Bernie was pushed out. Along with that Trump made grandiose promises and interacted with his audiences in a back and forth simulated dialogue, engaging them in a way Hillary didn't.

But his base is not authentically populist because they are not a cohesive group sharing a common experience, bonded through empathy. They have some commonalities that run across two or more groups, like the racist element, those angry about the economy, those concerned about illegal immigration, some for racist reasons, some for economic ones.

- Advertisement -

Then there is what I call the "cult" effect. Obama had this effect on his followers too. Those who see the leader as nearly infallible, who rationalize every fact or action that contradicts the qualities the leader is supposed to encompass. The evangelicals fall into this group, at least the true believers. The more cynical ones see Trump as a means to an end and couldn't care less if he even believes in God.

This is all good news for a Bernie Trump match-up. Why? Because when you have an authentic populist movement where people are truly bound by a common experience, perspective and have an emotional investment with others in the movement, there is no dividing it. With a false populist like Trump, winning requires the bringing together of a mish-mash group who are not connected to one another in any real emotional way. And given their goals only overlap in small segments it is very hard to please one group fully without running the risk of offending some part of the other groups.

If these smaller compartmentalized groups only look to Trump to give them what they want and he fails then they will abandon him. Ann Coulter might be the most high-profile example of this.

- Advertisement -

On the campaign trail Trump often mentioned the "forgotten man" and the populace who responded to this label wore just as proudly, like a badge of honor, the moniker "deplorables", assigned to them by his rival Hillary as an obvious insult. As the election wore on, both sides used these kinds of tactics to group voters, to herd them in what I believe Rob would see as top-down strategy.

The strategy on both sides was effectively the same. To create the most superior group and to excoriate any one who would dare to even consider being part of the other. The MAGA hat and the alternative Pussyhat became identifiers, symbols of your inclusion in the "better" group. There was no need to discuss issues because, after all, if you have on a MAGA hat you are obviously a racist, homophobic, islamaphobic, patriarchal, planet-destroying idiot, and if you are a Pussyhat you are obviously a baby-killing feminazi tree-hugger perverted globalist. Each team even had its shadowy supervillains in Mercer/Koch and Soros.

But all of these constructs and identifiers eliminate discussion, original thought and debate. They allow the populace to be "led". When Trump chants "Build the Wall!" and "Lock Her Up!" he effectively furthered his "brand". His crowds cheered on cue, just like they were expected to. When Hillary went through her list of "Trump traits", all the phobias, she furthered her "brand" and her supporters marched in lockstep as well.

But these are not true populist or bottom-up movements because they restrict the input of the constituency to allowed parameters. Being a middle child, negotiating, peacemaker, I quickly learned that there was absolutely no acceptance in either group unless you read your provided cue cards and marched in lockstep to the party platform.

I wanted Bernie from the beginning because he was the only candidate that seemed to be a true populist and a listener. He wasn't trying to garner attention through a "brand" or through "exclusion" and shaming the other side. Bernie was reaching out, with empathy, to the real pain Americans were going through. And I believe this is why he had to be eliminated, one way or another, by the two parties.

But now he's back. I think there is a rare opportunity at this particular time if the people can be reached with this message. Bernie's slogan says it best "Not me. Us." He gets it. Which is why once again the mainstream press are doing their level best to divide. It is why amped-up, top-down branding is on steroids and will only get worse before the elections.

- Advertisement -

So how can we defeat this mentality? We have to listen. We have to empathise. We have to stop participating in exclusion. Are there exceptions? Of course. There are people on the fringe who are a legitimate threat. Those who are so fanatical they seek only the destruction of the other side. But someone's views being offensive are not a good-enough reason to not listen to them. Twitter is full of "liberals" arguing "We don't want Trump voters in our movement. If expanding our majority means including any of them then the deal is off!"

Well, that's just what those at the top are happy to hear. We can either take back the power they have over us by reaching across the table or we can continue to allow our own fears and prejudices, encouraged by our masters in the elite, herd us right to the slaughterhouse.

If you are looking for someone to fight with about politics as we approach 2020, be courageous enough to take on the only opponent who can make a difference and have a fight with-- yourself.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michele Goddard Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I was born in 1970 in Wheeling, WV and have lived here all my life. I come from mostly Irish Catholic coal miners and railroad workers. My original academic interest was in teaching foreign languages studying both French and Spanish in High (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

True Populism VS Trumpulism

Hierarchy and Fascism - How the Ruling Few are Destroying Democracy

Rednecks with Short Memories - West Virginia, Birthplace of Democratic Socialism

The War of Words - Global Tribe and the Fall of Propaganda

Trump's Golden Parachute - Dissecting the Mueller Report

Speaking of Bernie's Money

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

8 people are discussing this page, with 23 comments


Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I hope in writing this it will get people to realize that Trump's weakness lies in his inauthentic appeals to emotion which pulls together people who are upset but who lack the true cohesive thought and collective empathy that a true populist movement has. This is a true advantage Bernie has over Trump. I didn't mention Biden in the article but Biden only appeals to a narrow group of voters and in my mind can not be defined in any way a populist. He has only gotten as far as he has due tona coddling press and massive corporate/banking support.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:02:23 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Rob Kall

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter

(Member since Jun 5, 2005), 304 fans, 2462 articles, 5233 quicklinks, 6065 comments, 511 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Michele Goddard:   New Content

great article. I also think Biden is doing well because people are afraid. They see him as the biggest name and a moderate who is safe. They are cowards and fail to see that Biden is just Hillary 2.0 and Trump will defeat him.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:21:03 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Rob Kall:   New Content

Rob,


Thank you so much for your comment. And I agree with you wholeheartedly concerning Biden. I'm sure Trump's handlers will allow the escalation of his behavior prior to the elections soley for the purpose of making Democrats desperate just to play it safe and go with someone they know can beat him virtually ensuring Biden will be pushed as this person. (He is already being touted as the only one who can beat Trump). But if we are going to get a Democrat who is going to continue the same policies as the Republicans what makes the difference?


Take Care,


Michele



Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 12:59:22 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Rich Buckley

Become a Fan
Author 73630

(Member since Nov 14, 2011), 2 fans, 30 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

What constitutes the voting components of Trump followers? Those who believe/hope/suspect/understand:

---Trump will press harder to end The New World Order and it's one-world government policies.

---Federalism generally leads to dictatorship by corporatism through banking,

---White Hats are for Trump in the military working to remove the Black Hats in the military. White Hats want American values protected by defense through strength, while Black Hats mean endless wars, pressing onward to WWIII for one world order, paralleling the hegemonic global interests of our privately owned and controlled Federal Reserve.

---Trump stands against the current privately owned Federal Reserve and will "do something to end its hegemonic powers," while Trump remains in office.

---Trump will pardon Assange, and if he does not pardon Assange, and/or do something to save Asange's life, Trump may not deserve a second term.

---See significance and depth of Trump's relationship with Trump's brilliant Uncle, Professor John Trump of MIT, opening the door to Tesla science, zero point energy, reverse alien technologies, split away civilization and why President Trump made the end run around the impacted military Black Hats for a new Space Force, in an attempt to finally give oversight to Off World activities that have always been kept above top secret.

---Trump has already toppled the Brennan-Klapper giant monster.

---By actually reading the science involved in Climate Change and realize we are in a break in ice-age normalcy and that CO2 is not a pollutant and immaterial to global warming.

---And respect his trade negotiating tactics for real free-trade leveling the playing field for American interests.

---See the mainstream media as corrupted through consolidation into a few from the many.

---UFO full disclosure and suspect Trump knows a lot of secrets first from his brilliant Uncle John Trump of MIT and now as POTUS.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:11:17 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Rob Kall

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter

(Member since Jun 5, 2005), 304 fans, 2462 articles, 5233 quicklinks, 6065 comments, 511 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Rich Buckley:   New Content

Do you believe this or are you citing what Trump supporters believe?


Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:09:52 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

nelswight

Become a Fan
Author 2581

(Member since Sep 3, 2006), 159 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Rich Buckley:   New Content



Rich, I hear you but I keep a full saltshaker at hand stilll.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:32:15 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Gene Engene

Become a Fan
Author 42380

(Member since Dec 14, 2009), 98 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

"A true populist movement comes about when the populace begins to have a common feeling, a cohesive mind-set brought about usually through shared suffering and empathy for each others in their group."

This, of course, fairly neatly states the fundamental principle of socialism. Interestingly, it wasn't invented by any leader, or political 'scientist'. It simply emerged among early groups of prehistoric humans who were focussed on a few quite simple things to ensure their very survival - getting food, water, fuel for the fire, and a safe place to spend the night and rest, protected from potential predatory threats. As such, I've come to think that it is somehow embedded in our DNA. It has been a part of what we had to do to survive the millennia between then and now. It is even evident in small rural communities, some far off the Interstate, right now, where there is no local police, no clinic, no fire department, except volunteers, and few local businesses - perhaps a small 'convenience' store that stocks mostly convenience foods, basic pain relievers and bandaids, and some basic, non-perishable staples. There may still be a Post Office, that can process money orders, but no bank, as such. The residents all know what's necessary to keep their way of life going - mutually understood, and accepted, interdependence and responsibility. There are community gardens, to which each contributes what they can - perhaps seeds or compost and labor, and from which each can take as they need to. There may be a few reliable vehicles, none less than ten years old, that can make a 40+ mile trip to a larger town for medical needs, a grocery stop, and banking. Again, this is not an invented social construct. It is what we had to do to survive - and, I think, still is, given how we provide police, fire, and even emergency medical support via taxation.

Some of us understand this, on an internal, emotional basis - it just feels right. But there is, too, a rational, clear thinking, logical basis for it, IF one takes the time to think about it, and can wade through all the ill-informed, not to say ignorant, rhetoric against it. After all, it distributes social benefits according to needs, and provides them according to abilities. Marx understood this, which is why capitalists fear and hate him and his 'ideology'.

This leads to so many different, but connected, things, from pre-natal care to an earned death benefit, which follow on in such a natural sequence that it almost engineers itself, as long as avaricious narcissists are kept out of it. They are the true internal threat we have to control.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:30:43 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Gene Engene:   New Content

Thank you for your comments. I think there are so many of us who share this mindset and you are absolutely correct that the capitalists hate Marxism becuase they parasitically feed off of the consumer base and the working class. The use every tool they can find to get us more addicted to stuff. I wish people would realize that we can't defeat a beast that we continue to feed. Do people not stop to think about the fact that literally every celebratory event in our lives involves buying gifts? It takes so much away from the emotional, spiritual and community experience.

I look forward to having more conversations with you.

Take care,

Michele

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:15:19 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Michele Goddard:   New Content

Also, I totally agree with you about this being part or our DNA. I have written on my theory this before , though I have since read other articles and they offer different versions my belief is that we started out as hunter gather tribes. Men were hunters and women stayed with the children so men evolved differently so be more aggressive and women developed more defensive instincts. The alpha male and hierarchical systems developed because the "best" hunter bore so much weight and was given so much praise for bringing home the food. This would provide special treatment or respect for this man as the leader. But as people moved towards agricultural communities the work was more collectivist and men and women's roles were not distinguished by aggression and pure physical strength but by stamina to work in the fields. In these communities, the male trying to assert his special status and dominance waa a liability not an asset. Also men would have had a morw integral and protective role iver children. I think in areas where women were free to choose men rather than arranged couplings there would have been a tendency to choose men who were less aggressive and more cooperative. Obviously both types of men always existrd but I think there was somewhat of a shift in thinking of which was more valuable. If you listen to a lot of fringe right wing groups the frequently lament how agreesion and violence in men should be prized not shamed. They are digustd by the "feminization" of boys. I think this is a reemergence of the repressed psychology of the primitive male hunter. Fascist regimes ate famous for stoking this feeling in men. Its like a secret weapon in their cult of donimance and hierarchy.


Thanks again for the comments,


Take care,


Michele


Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 11:45:26 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndent

Rob Kall

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter

(Member since Jun 5, 2005), 304 fans, 2462 articles, 5233 quicklinks, 6065 comments, 511 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Michele Goddard:   New Content

interesting perspective I haven't heard before.

One thing, most of human existence, people lived in small bands, not tribes.

And in my conversations with Daniel Quinn, author of Ishmael and Beyond Civilization, he hypothesized that agriculture led to more hierarchy because of the creation of police and warriors to protect food surpluses.


You might enjoy Riane Eisler's book, Chalice and The Blade. I've done a few interviews with her too.


Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:15:43 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndentIndent

Susan Lee Schwartz

Become a Fan
Author 40790

(Member since Oct 25, 2009), 24 fans, 17 articles, 3815 quicklinks, 7032 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Rob Kall:   New Content

I write about UC-- "unintended consequences" of societal changes....things that could not have been predicted at the time.

There have been 4 transformative eras in history. Every single one had unintended consequences, including the era when humans decided to stay put. Towns, cities and states grew at the nexus of rivers. Of course they needed protection. Forts and armies, and finally state military.

The next transformative era was one of industry. Steam engines, the cotton ginny, led to the growth of manufacturing hubs... and pollution etc...

The third was communication technology... beginning with the telegraph and telephone-- where people did not have to live near each other--within 50miles-- in order to stay in touch.

But the last transformative era, was one of a NEW INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-- where images and memes could be passed down by the corporatists states. it only began with television. JFK was the first to use mad-men to sell a politician. The passing down of propaganda is the start of. fascist state. It allowed a visual barrage of violent behavior, so that our children, and our young adults, and our bored young men, are bombarded with images of aggression, where blood and violence solve problems, and where 'evil creatures' must be taken down at any costs... forget the collateral damage.

I was born in 1941, when the first tv programs were introduced; there were dramas based on the interactions between people, not the constant aggression & competition promoted today. MY grandson is 13 and we play Fortnite. I played Monopoly with my grandma. Even cooking programs are 'competitions' where there are losers... and children cry.

Finally, along came that invention that put information technology: --the internet-- into a place of anarchy-- cyberspace - where mendacity is the rule, and the worst human behaviors are shared.

Ralph Nader addresses this here ,too. "The campuses have really changed. They were among the first responders on the environment, women's rights, civil rights. Now they have conflicts over politically correct speech. People used to be invited to speak before large auditoriums full of rapt students ready to sign petitions. Those days are over. I really mean over. Done...You can't even look them in the eye. They walk through campus looking at their cellphones. They know less and less about history. I talk to students today whose priority is the environment, and they've never heard of Barry Commoner, arguably the most prominent scientist on the environment in the twentieth century. They are factually deprived, in part because they think they can access any fact at their fingertips anytime, anywhere. So why would they want to know the names of the Supreme Court justices, or the name of their governor, or the name of their member of Congress? The main way to get a rise out of students today is with verbal slurs about gender and race."

Ralph Nader says : "Knowledge of history is critical for life in the present. If you don't know U.S. history, you don't know about the farmers' revolt in the late 1800s, which created the People's Party and produced a lot of wonderful things we benefit from, such as the eight-hour workday and the popular election of U.S. senators.Civics has been downgraded in school. Children don't learn how to use the tools of democracy. They aren't given civic experience in the community under adult supervision. They just are told, "Sit down, look at the computer, and develop computer skills." We're going to lose a generation. "

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 3:54:51 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndentIndentIndent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Susan Lee Schwartz:   New Content

Thank you for such an in depth and informative response. The article I'm working on for next week.has to do with some of The things you mention here. I always appreciate additions to tue conversation and other perspectives, especially from someone like you who can pull it all together into a coherent strictured thought.


Take care,


Michele

Submitted on Thursday, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:50:58 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndentIndent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Rob Kall:   New Content

Thanks for the additional information. I just read that in your book actually and found that theory intriguing as well. By the way, I'm a slow reader but what I've read so far fascinates me in the similarity of our thought processes. I really like that the style of your book is in itself "bottom up" and seems to draw from lots of perspectives which is truly, in my experience, is the best form of learning. When I finish it I will be sure to review it on Amazon. I could already say so much about it but I want to be able to be thorough.


I am always interested in the various factors physiological, neurological, psychological, socialogocal etc that comprise human behavior.


Thanks for writing the book,


Take care,


Michele

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:37:51 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Susan Lee Schwartz

Become a Fan
Author 40790

(Member since Oct 25, 2009), 24 fans, 17 articles, 3815 quicklinks, 7032 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Gene Engene:   New Content

Half this population (approx) are females, and I can tell you that the majority of them, not just the young ones, are fed up with the male dominated legislatures and a Congress which refuses to do its job... which is not to legislate control over a females life... for that is what it does with its GOP pro-life agenda.It wants to kick it up to the Supreme Court hoping it will overturn Roe.

Our Congress does not work, or that incompetent. insane embarassement would not be President another day.

"As the historian Garry Wills once put it, "No matter what the sequence of action among the three departments, if the process is played out to the end, Congress always gets the last say (if it wants it)."

"But that final point "if it wants it" gets at the problem that now confronts our constitutional system: Congress doesn't want its power. Both executive agencies and courts have become more powerful in recent decades, and both now effectively make laws. But though critics of both trends tend to attribute them to excessive ambitions among judges, presidents, or regulators, more important has been the lack of constitutional ambition among members of Congress.

"Whether driven by partisanship, misguided by perverse media and political incentives, or simply put off by the burdens of responsibility, members of both houses are now reluctant to really legislate."

Wish I had said that but it is here.

Submitted on Thursday, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:17:11 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Rich Buckley

Become a Fan
Author 73630

(Member since Nov 14, 2011), 2 fans, 30 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Trump only appears as the non-authentic-populist to the materialist vested in the outer world of the third dimension. In other realms, the inner realm, Trump's group of deplorables are drawn from an eclectic mix of many factions that share one important characteristic: gravitational intuition that Trump is their antidote to tyranny... and the convoluted hand of God at work too ironic to judge.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:24:58 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

Paul Cohen

Become a Fan
Author 1890

(Member since Jun 15, 2006), 3 fans, 59 articles, 26 quicklinks, 1180 comments, 12 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

A basic dilemma with the concept of democracy is that people can be manipulated by propaganda. At the same time that some are manipulated by the propaganda, many others are able to see through that propaganda an are turned off by that realization. But can they act on that? Our traditional voting system allows voters to say only which candidate they like most. Opposition to a candidate or to an agenda are severely muted.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 2:12:55 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Paul Cohen:   New Content

You are right and the Facebook debacle was an example of this. Targeted, personalized advertising meets targeted, personalized propaganda. But this is why part of our revolution has to be one to one engagement. As we go forward and the people of the world through adanced technology become more interconnected and can develop a sense of global community, propaganda will be harder and harder to pass off. Those in the manipulation industry are already studying ways around this to prevent it from happening. Whether we like it or not we are in a war, an arms race of technology and the human use of it. The overt brainwashing going on in our country is astounding. I see people so literally under the absolute mind control of these programs of manipulation that it is reaching dangerous levels. The QAnon phenomena for example is one of the most obvious and recent examples. The cult style isolation of its members, the training they receive to reject any and all information no matter how much evidence there is for it if it comes from those outside the cult whereas they immediately accept and believe any information given by the cult leader even if there is proof it ia inaccurate is extremely dangerous. Anytime any group replaces critical thinking with devotion then any propaganda will suffice to matter how flimsy.

Thanks again for the conversation,

Take care,

Michele

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 11:54:47 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Rob Kall

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter

(Member since Jun 5, 2005), 304 fans, 2462 articles, 5233 quicklinks, 6065 comments, 511 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Paul Cohen:   New Content

Trump has been very effective at persuaded his supporters to see all the mainstream media except Fox as fake news. They don't believe the reporting from CNN, MSNBC, or others. Think about how progressives think of reporting from Fox. We don't buy most of what they say and treat Fox with contempt. That means that Trump supporters are getting a very narrow sliver of truth and basing their decisions on it. When I have conversations with conservatives, one thing that gives me credibility is my dislike for and distrust for both parties.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:20:36 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Rob Kall:   New Content

I have a very small circle of contacts and the few conservatives I know react differently to what I consider my equal scrutiny of both sides. They are usually surprised when they bring up a criticism of Democrats and I agree with them. But they think by my agreeing with them on an issue of corruptuon on the left that they have "convinced me" or that perhaps there is hope for me to be saved from the Marxist brainwashing I have obviously been the victim of. I used to think my even handedness gave me credibility that would give my point of view on Trump and the Republicans some weight but as soon as I do they recoil and go immediately on the defense. They will chime in and agree with me when they think it means I'm confirming they are right but are not willing to even consider there is any reliability on the right. I'm glad to know they aren't all like that.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:48:35 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Susan Lee Schwartz

Become a Fan
Author 40790

(Member since Oct 25, 2009), 24 fans, 17 articles, 3815 quicklinks, 7032 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I recommend this wonderful article in The Sun. The Great Work where Ralph Nader and David Barsamian discuss with great intelligence, what is afoot today.

A few examples:

" Nader: Gerrymandering is basically a system in which the politicians pick the voters instead of the people picking the politicians. Democrats hate gerrymandering when Republicans control more state legislatures, and Republicans hate gerrymandering when the shoe is on the other foot. So who is responsible? I blame both parties." ..."We've got to change the voting laws. We need a universal voting requirement and easy access to the ballot. It is harder to get on the ballot in North Carolina than in eight European countries."

Barsamian: "Harvard University professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt have a book out called How Democracies Die. They write, "We tend to think of democracies [as] dying at the hands of men with guns. But there is another way to break a democracy. . . . At the hands not of generals but of elected leaders." They go on to say that Trump's election was a step toward authoritarianism, but the erosion began long before Trump, and the problems will outlast him."

Nader: That was in a message to Congress in 1938 before World War II. And that's what fascism is: the merger of big business and government, so that big business not only has power over the private economy but uses the power of government to entrench itself. This usually brings violations of civil liberties, suppression of free speech, manipulation of elections to a point where they shouldn't even be called elections, and the concentration of wealth, income, and power in the hands of the few.

Barsamian: Would you include Trump's relentless attacks on the media and journalists as a warning sign of fascism?

Nader: Yes, of course. Fascism attacks any potential challenge from society. It attacks minorities who don't go along, which is what Hitler did, obviously. The fascist corporate state can brook no budding challenge. It can't allow challengers to get a foot in the door. There is a whiff of fascism in the air. I use that term with care, because sometimes it's invoked promiscuously. But Franklin D. Roosevelt said, "The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism."

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:03:50 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Susan Lee Schwartz:   New Content

Thanks for adding this. Great info!

Submitted on Thursday, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:51:57 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Kenneth Morris

Become a Fan
Author 506896

(Member since Oct 15, 2016), 2 fans, 7 articles, 232 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I think you're putting too much emphasis on the fuzzy term "populism."

As best as I have been able to figure out, populism is just democracy that elites don't like. It follows that those denigrated as populists are usually of a lower social and sometimes economic class than the elites, but I'm not convinced that they're more emotional, more vulgar, or more self-interested than the elites.

Oscar Arias of Costa Rica, who was born to wealth. educated in England, and served two presidential terms, keeps criticizing Daniel Ortega, president of Nicaragua, as a populist. The only explanations for this that I can see is that Arias doesn't like Ortega in part because Ortega was not born to wealth, intentionally rejects the affectations of the upper class, and enjoys disproportionate democratic support from the poor.

Trump, a billionaire rich kid from Queens, doesn't fit the populist stereotype by background, but he sure does by his appeal. His fame came from reality TV, barely a status step above wrestling, while his emotional appeal is to the less well educated.

Meanwhile, historically I've never heard the abolitionists called populists. My understanding is that the historic populist movement was a movement of farmers in the South and Midwest during the late 19th century, allied in part against railroad freight rates though probably also against the commodities exchange in Chicago and other instances of elites putting the screws to them.

Fascinating is that in South populist farmers initially joined forces across racial lines, though soon the whites split off and turned against the blacks. Apparently white pride or privilege or whatever was stronger than common economic concerns--although some say that elites fomented the racial division in order to crush the movement.

One thing that seems true is that successful so-called populists end up catering to the business class while simultaneously spewing a lot of platitudes about defending the "little guy." Hitler did this, Ortega does this, and Trump does it.

Maybe populism is some sub-type of democratic leadership, but it sure is a fuzzy sub-type.

Submitted on Thursday, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:32:18 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 3 fans, 10 articles, 79 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Kenneth Morris:   New Content

Thank you for the comment. I agree with some of your response but rather than looking at populist in terms of haves and have not which you are correct is a typical historical interpretation and application of the term populism, I was attempting to distinguish the differences between two different types of movements. One being a unified group of idividuals sharing a cohesive mindset and a shared empathy based on their experiences as a group and a hodge podge group of people who may have entirely different perspectives feelings and drives but are drawn to a figure like Trump who they each feel is there juat for them. Perhaps uaing the term populist confused my point because of its past use.


Thanks again for your input,


Take Care,


Michele

Submitted on Thursday, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:00:14 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment