--Refusing to share with Russia information that Moscow could use to investigate any possible culpability in the incident by anyone either on Russian soil or under Russian control.
These are my observations as a citizen of Switzerland. I am not a politician, but an established businessman of Swiss and Persian heritage. I steadfastly try to uphold the tradition of my country for neutrality and impartiality. But I have some inescapable concerns that I must share with you.
I'm old enough to remember Bill Clinton's Monica Lewinsky sex scandal. Clinton initiated military strikes against Iraq and Afghanistan at opportunistic times during the unfolding of the scandal. Polls show that a great many Americans believed the actions were timed to distract public attention from the public shaming of the president.
Unlike Clinton's engineered distractions, Trump's didn't result in considerable loss of life. But Tump's actions may turn out to be far worse for the whole world in the long run. His retaliation against Russia for yet unproven misdeeds amounts to no more than a provocation, plain and simple.
History tells us that world wars have been initiated not merely by dire circumstances, but by provocations. For World War I it was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo over a local struggle. That spun out of control to envelop great world powers in what came to be known as the "Great War."
A provocation was also alleged in the start of World War II. Many implicate a Nazi false-flag attack on a German radio station in Gleiwitz. Nazi operatives dressed in Polish uniforms allegedly attacked the site in order to bolster Hitler's rationale for invading Poland. World War II followed.
Now what are we to think of Theresa May's provocative and unsupported allegations against Russia in the Skripal case? What is her game plan in precipitously accusing Russia in the absence of substantiating facts?
I've already posited my suspicion regarding Trump's motives for joining in. What does he think he'll accomplish by expelling 60 Russian diplomats and ordering the closure of Russia's only West Coast consulate?
Clearly these provocations will lead to retaliation. There is a risk that things will spiral out of control. Is the UK Skripal Affair worth the risk of a direct nuclear confrontation between the US and Russia?
A likely place for this to play out is in Syria. Russia has valid national interests there. It is clear to most people that the US has valid interests in Germany, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, etc. But Russia's interests in Syria are too often minimized or ignored by the world community.
Now we are faced with both Russian and American military forces operating in Syria concurrently. Sometimes they exist at cross-purposes.
Moscow has hinted strongly and openly that great strife could be sparked by covert US military actions. Washington has been warned not to endanger Russian lives or to damage Russian military assets. Putin has threatened serious consequences.
The serious consequence that concerns me most is possible nuclear retaliation in some form by Russia. Russia has all the means to respond if attacked. The question is how far can Putin be pushed before he pushes the button.
Ironically, such a response would be within the realm of international law since Russia has issued clear warnings. It has drawn a red line that can never be crossed. It is the harming of Russian lives by US actions.
Russian officials have suggested that there will be tit-for-tat retaliation for Western diplomatic expulsions and other unjustified actions against it.
I fear that may not send a clear enough message, especially to Mrs. May. After all, it is she who has been the primary instrument of attack.
An unmistakable move by Moscow would be to send the UK's ambassador packing and order the closure of all UK diplomatic offices on Russian soil. That would constitute a message that would be hard to misunderstand.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
