Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The CIA Wouldn't Lie to Us, Would They?

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 17880
Message David Cox
Become a Fan
  (91 fans)
- Advertisement -

Well, the President did tell us to go shopping, but again it sounds like they're claiming victory too soon as I don't see that resilience today, but it does explain where the money went. Here it is, in their own words.

"The rise in GDP in 2004-07 was undergirded by substantial gains in labor productivity."

The harder you work the less you get, and by eliminating jobs altogether we build productivity. Through "flexibility" we can help 20% of the population to achieve the American dream. That's the plan, cut and dried, that's your future as laid out by your government.

Then there is the Gini coeffient, which is a number used by the CIA to judge income distribution in nations. A scale from 1 to 60, where the lower the number the more equitable the society. European nations score from the high twenties to the low thirties. The United States scores a 45, and just for reference Germany scores a 28, and Guatemala scores a 55. The People's Republic of China scores 46.9 and Costa Rica 49.8 so the US score is closer to Guatemala and China than it is to Germany.

- Advertisement -

Mexico has long been used as an example of a stilted, stratified economy where a small group of wealthy live among massive poverty, and what is Mexico's Gini score? 46.1

Once again, these are the government's figures. They tell us we live in an equitable and fair economy, where everyone has a equal chance and they don't believe it themselves but will gladly tell you that they do. Because what else can they tell you? The CIA merely documents the statistics and you don't have to read tea leaves to see what the futures holds. Just as they tell you we need to lower trade barriers because everyone else is doing it, because it will be good for us, just you wait and see. Then we'll fix healthcare and Social Security and everyone will be happy. Oh, except that, "In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions."

- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

David Cox Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I who am I? Born at the pinnacle of American prosperity to parents raised during the last great depression. I was the youngest child of the youngest children born almost between the generations and that in fact clouds and obscures who it is that (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Hobo's Lullaby

100 Reasons for Revolution

Guns or Butter

Taken at the Flood

When will the Economy Collapse? You're Looking at It!

In this Country at Least, The Revolution Will Not Be Televised