Was it the CDC's plan to panic the public, giving everyone the impression that we were under sudden attack, when in fact the virus had been around for months, if not much longer?
How accurate is the current testing protocol, anyway? Not at all, according to some researchers, including David Crowe, host of the radio show, "The Infectious Myth. Crowe explains, "While the definition of SARS, an earlier coronavirus panic, was self-limiting, the definition of the new coronavirus disease is open-ended, allowing the imaginary epidemic to grow...if the coronavirus test has a problem with false positives (as all biological tests do) then testing an uninfected population will produce only false-positive tests, and the definition of the disease will allow the epidemic to go on forever."
Work is proceeding on a vaccine, per usual, but vaccines such as the flu vaccine don't work well, if at all. In the case of the measles and mumps vaccines, they clearly don't confer permanent immunity, as getting the disease naturally does, which is why it has been reported that the majority of the disease "outbreaks" consist of primarily of young adults who were previously vaccinated as children. Vaccines have also been linked to a wide array of severe and permanent injuries, including: neurological damage, chronic illness, autoimmune disease, and death (including SIDS, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). No vaccine on the market has been tested for its potential to 1) cause cancer, 2) damage DNA, or 3) impair fertility. That admission is on every vaccine package insert, in Section 13. No long term health studies, no true placebo studies, no studies comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated populations have been conducted. Vaccines are so problematic and in order to escape an avalanche of lawsuits, the vaccine industry ran to Congress for relief and was granted blanket immunity from prosecution in 1986.
Yet the CDC and WHO continue to tell the world that vaccines are "safe and effective", as Big Pharma makes billions from vaccine sales.
The development of a Coronavirus vaccine is being held to a still lower standard than other vaccines in that it excludes animal studies. It is also admitted that a Coronavirus vaccine could spread the virus, as other vaccines do. "Studies have suggested that Coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as 'vaccine enhancement', where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a Coronavirus vaccine." report Reuters. Virus transmission is a problem for many vaccines, as admitted in Section 5.8 of vaccine package inserts. Mutant strains of the polio vaccine now cause more paralysis than wild polio.
Can the Coronavirus be the result of flu vaccines? Yes. A recent military study shows military personnel evaluated who received the flu vaccine were at 36 percent increased risk for coronavirus with varied benefit in preventing some strains of the flu, reports the medical journal, Vaccine.
The Coronavirus is not containable, we could all get it, if we haven't already had it, according to health professionals and epidemiologists . "...the likely outcome is that it (Coronavirus) will ultimately not be containable," says Harvard epidemiology professor Marc Lipsitch, in an interview with The Atlantic. "As many as 25% of people infected with the new Coronavirus remain asymptomatic," said Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as reported in LiveScience.
Which means that a considerable percentage of the population are unknowing vectors. In addition, an MIT researcher says that Coronavirus might be able to travel up to 27 feet in the air, not 6 feet as previously reported. Meanwhile, many commercial hand sanitizers contain triclosan and other ingredients that are not only ineffective, but toxic.
So, why isolate the population from the inevitable? Why employ sanitation strategies that do more harm than good? Why not instead let everyone get exposed and develop immunity, except for the highly vulnerable?
It has long been predicted by political and health activists, that various governments & businesses would use a pandemic to force the entire global population to be vaccinated. The U.S. federal health agencies, WHO, select business leaders, and others have been promoting a globalist/Big Pharma agenda for decades, most notably, vaccination and population control. Bill Gates, who is heavily invested in vaccine development, has a skin implant ready-to-go that would track individuals, show who has the disease, and who has received a vaccine. It's Big Brother on steroids.
In fact, the federal government already has a National Vaccine Plan. "It is a Plan designed to make sure you, your child and everyone in America gets every dose of every vaccine that government officials recommend now and in the future," says Barbara Loe Fisher, President of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC).
The U.S. Constitution & the Bill of Rights does not say that we have rights unless there's a pandemic" in which case we can be put under house arrest and forced to take prescribed medications. Our Founding Fathers had rampant diseases at the time and understood their consequences. Keeping any part of this nation in lockdown over a virus no worse than the flu is medical and political tyranny. We should be ashamed that so many American leaders are participating in this travesty, and that so many Americans are letting it happen. We need a ton more Daryl Metcalfes to get this ship of state back on course.
Louise Francis is a co-author of this article, which can also be found at http://www.healthalertphilly.org/CoronavirusDebacle.htm
(Article changed on April 7, 2020 at 14:30)
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
5
4
2
