Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Share on Twitter 4 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 5/5/19

Speaking of Bernie's Money

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   8 comments
Author 513220
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michele Goddard
- Advertisement -

The reason was simple. Wealth inequality is a big deal to large group of people and those who get in bed with corporations are seen as corrupt. At a speaking event Nancy Pelosi tried to discuss the issues of wealth inequality and faced heckling from a person asking her "what is your net worth Nancy?" At a town hall on Medicare for All, Dianne Feinstein was heckled about her support for profit making insurance companies and big pharma rather than being for the people. The growing requirement of progressive democrats to distinguish themselves from establishment Democrats in not taking corporate money is a distinct marker of this divide.

Progressives associate wealth to corruption. This is Bernie's mantra and is exactly why the mainstream media, establishment Dems and Republicans all joined forces to try and make Bernie into "just another rich politician". Bernie's wealth became a target for those wanting to eliminate him from the conversation. The same was true of Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and her blunt force attack on wealth inequality which made her a hero of the poor and a target of the wealthy of both parties.

All of these candidates force the examination of why some see money as the root of all evil while others don't. If we start with the premise that simply being rich makes a person somehow a bad person, then we would have to agree that all poor people are virtuous, which is a ridiculous argument to make. So what specifically is it about the rich then that we have come to despise? Is it simply wrong to have more than someone else, is it only wrong if the disparity between the richest and the poorest is huge or it is because we assume that having money gives one privilege that is unjust?

It is now self evident that there is huge wealth disparity and that this disparity expresses itself in our society in such a gross way that it impacts every aspect of our lives from how much justice a person gets in court to whether they live or die for lack of health care.

- Advertisement -

Likewise our country has a well established history of wealth disparity being the direct result of exploitation. From its very inception our country has exhibited a bipolar nature in its expresseed idealism of opportunity while in its operation strives to maintain a class system which ensures the rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer. This dichotomous quality being the result of an importation of conflicting ideologies at the very start. Our founding fathers wrote that all men were created equal while exploiting slave labor to build the nation.

These competing narratives are part of the fiber of America. The intense focus on balance of powers, check and balances and the rule of law being contrasted with the very real influence that money provides the wealthy to circumvent these checks and with glaring consistency allows them undue control over government to favor their interests at the expense of the masses.

So it would generally be accepted that it isn't the money itself that makes a person evil. The assumption is that the extremely wealthy have gotten that way through exploitation and that those having such wealth will use the position to maintain the system which allows continued exploitation and favoritism.

- Advertisement -

So back to Bernie's money. There is nothing in Bernie's history to suggest that any of his money came from the exploitation of others. He has not used his wealth to avoid or exempt himself from any checks and balances. In fact when asked in a Fox News town hall about benefiting from Trump's tax break because of his income level, Bernie was quick to say that he voted against the tax breaks for the wealthy. When the host, Martha, challenged this response with the suggestion that he could "give back" the additional taxes. Bernie reminded her that she could give back what she had gotten in excess as well adding "you probably make more money than I do." The other host's response revealed the bold truth about their different perspectives, "Well she's not advocating for a wealth tax, you are. And she's not running for president."

It was both defensive and revealing. Both hosts were advocating for the current system which promotes inequality yet were trying to cast responsibility on Bernie, as both an individual and a presidential candidate, to subject himself to penalty while exempting themselves from it as proof of his moral authority. You can't ask a person to prove their moral authority by promoting a system that subjects only certain people to a rule.

Bernie's answer was perfect. He said he wants a system where everyone is held to account. Merely giving up his extra in taxes does nothing to create a more fair system.

In respect to the comments made by many who criticized Bernie's wealth I find myself amazed that they can so easily dismiss those in the establishment on both sides who seem to have no qualms about existing within a system where wealth buys influence. I found it quite revealing that in light of Joe Biden's long awaited announcement it seemed a fairly small bump in the road that he held an event with large donors including Comcast to raise money.

He then went to get an endorsement from a firefighters union which is highly publicized making him look like a man of the people. But how many times have we seen that the cost of corporate support is to work against the people? How is it that Bernie's wealth which has not corrupted him is a problem, but the same is not true of Biden and the other establishment Democrats?

This hypocritical treatment is often due to the perception of Bernie as a "purist". So let's examine it from that perspective. There are some people who would argue that just "being" wealthy is unethical. Obviously, there is political ideology that extols an idea that private property itself is just the first step on the way to a class system. So even if Bernie's wealth is not exorbitant and it wasn't gained through any exploitation of others, as a purist, does it make him corrupt simply because he is not spreading it around? To some extent I can understand and agree with the argument when you have as much money as Jeff Bezos or the Koch brothers, one might argue that you can't possibly use all of that money and if other people's immense suffering could be alleviated by you spreading your wealth around but you don't, it becomes a character issue to that extent. If you have wealth and hoard it while other suffer, that is immoral.

- Advertisement -

For many there is a certain line at which we expect redistribution just because we feel that this vast disparity violates a fundamental sense of fairness. The problem with this concept is the subjectivity of the word fairness. To many who would complain that Bernie can't argue for fairness when he is a millionaire then I pose this question - what is "fair".

Fairness in this comparative scenario leads to problems. If you have a car worth $20,000 dollars and your neighbor can't afford a car, should you be forced to sell your car and then find two $10,000 cars and give one to your neighbor? What if you only have a $500 junker car that barely runs, but your neighbor doesn't have one, should you be forced to sell it and give your neighbor $250 and then neither of you have a car? Of course this could go on endlessly and sounds absurd. We don't live and exist in a communist society where everyone is expected to share everything and yet we do want things to be more "fair". So we have created these imaginary lines dividing people into classes ourselves so that we can decide who should be subject to having their wealth be redistributed and who is "rich enough" to be "one of those people".

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 5   Well Said 3   Supported 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michele Goddard Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I was born in 1970 in Wheeling, WV and have lived here all my life. I come from mostly Irish Catholic coal miners and railroad workers. My original academic interest was in teaching foreign languages studying both French and Spanish in High (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Rednecks with Short Memories - West Virginia, Birthplace of Democratic Socialism

The War of Words - Global Tribe and the Fall of Propaganda

Trump's Golden Parachute - Dissecting the Mueller Report

Speaking of Bernie's Money

Why We Need Bernie Sanders

Words matter: Lessons from High School Speech Class

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

5 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments


Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 2 fans, 6 articles, 48 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Wealth inequality isnat the forefront of many issues facing our country and candidates are becoming more aware of the voter perception of their moral compass on this issue. A candidates refusing PAC money is bordering on a requirement for some voters and shows the sensitivity to the disparity in income and its link to corruption. While some blindly demonize wealth others are more concerned with thw origin of the wealth and the wariness of the privilege it affords the upper class. It has become such a galvanizing issue that attacking a candidate who is seen as elitist, out of touch, greedy or corrupt.

Submitted on Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 12:53:19 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Joan Brunwasser

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Dec 18, 2005), 87 fans, 953 articles, 4813 quicklinks, 1747 comments, 4 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Michele Goddard:   New Content

Very good article, Michele! Thank you.

Submitted on Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 3:47:15 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 2 fans, 6 articles, 48 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Joan Brunwasser:   New Content

Thank you for the feed back Joan. I appreciate it. Hopefully after the next election we will all be writing commentary on how a real populist uprising led to President Bernie Sanders taking down Trump.




Submitted on Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 8:09:44 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

b. sadie bailey

Become a Fan
Author 56818

(Member since Dec 5, 2010), 14 fans, 5 articles, 24 quicklinks, 1066 comments, 4 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Good article and well thought. Questions we all need to be asking ourselves; sadly, many will not look at their own double-standards.

Typical of the hypocritical elite class, these elitist scumbags who are in it for power and nothing else, will vilify anyone who wants a more just society - and if that person happens to have EARNED wealth, they'll use that person's wealth against them. Bernie Sanders is no trust fund baby slacker who never worked a day in his life - he actually WORKED for his money, got his campaign money from small donations without corporations, lobbyists, and super pacs. He has, throughout his entire political career and before he was even a politician, fought for justice and righting economic and social disparity. So he wrote a book and made one of the best filibuster speeches in US history - without eating or taking breaks or stopping. So he made money off of book sales... so? So what?!

The two best candidates for this presidency: Tulsi Gabbard and Bernie Sanders - don't have a chance with the dumbing down going on through so called "media" and people refusing to think of complexities and paradox. I don't agree with some of what Sanders has done or his weak foreign policy, but I know he is ethical.

Yeah, he should have fought harder about what dirty things were done to him by Hilary Clinton and the DNC - but I know some of his delegates who were there at the democratic convention and who saw him come out of a private meeting with the DNC looking bent - almost broken.

The Handlers have the power - not the president - as long as you serve THEIR agenda. Sanders dared to buck the agenda and they had to destroy him. It's hard to believe that just 4 years ago he has a populist following of such huge scope - and now he has almost zero support.

What the hell happened? Do the US working class, working poor and abject poor have Stockholm Syndrome, and can only love and support their abusers?

Submitted on Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 4:34:47 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help
 
Indent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 2 fans, 6 articles, 48 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to b. sadie bailey:   New Content

Thank you for the feedback. I think Bernie has able even bigger following now than he had before and that is why the MSM is working overtime to convince us he is an outlier. We have to believe. We have to fight. Write the DNC and tell them that they screwed up big time putting their thumb on tthe scale for Hillary and you hope they learned from their mistake. I know its probably a futile effort because I honestly think the woulld take 4 more years of Trump than to have Bernie win. Now that tells you how sad it is.


Take care,


Mic

Submitted on Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 6:33:20 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

John Lawrence Ré

Become a Fan
Author 78374

(Member since Apr 17, 2012), 20 fans, 2 articles, 1204 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to b. sadie bailey:   New Content

It only proves two things: that the working poor would rather be screwed more by someone who publicly acknowledges them than be screwed a little less by someone who regards than as de classe and won't even visit their rust belt sacrifice zones. And that establishment intellecutals are too stupid to understand this.

There's an old saying that at the gates of heaven St. Peter will ask you two questions: how did you make your money, and how did you spend it? Not how much? Bernie only needs to worry about how he spent the money WE gave him...and that is why he is still in purgatory.

Submitted on Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 7:55:53 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Lee Stanfield

Become a Fan
Author 512995

(Member since Feb 3, 2019), 3 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

An excellent, insightful article, which goes much farther than just a discussion of Bernie Sanders. It logically and carefully explains the major reasons that the Trump base votes against their own interests, and the inconsistencies and divides within the Democratic Party.

Submitted on Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 6:53:47 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 2 fans, 6 articles, 48 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Lee Stanfield:   New Content

Thank you for your kind words. I hope that progressives will take a different approach to Trump voters than what I see in the DNC sulloting Dems. I agree there are Trump voters we don't want under our umbrella, but. I feel like Hillary made a political calculation that "deplorable" (uneducated poor people) lived in areas that didn't mattee because mathmaetically states like WV weren't going to give HER a win. Not only did she decide those people weren't worth the effort but she then used them as punching bag, mocking them, insulting them, to gain favor with elitist Dems in more urban/densely populated areas that would give her more electoral votes. She literally threw those voters to Trump. I know people who didn't want to vote for Trump but were so dejected bt Hillary's insulting behaviour they thought they would give Trump a chance. Many many people who made that choice won't go do far as to say they would change their vote to Hillary if they could but they have serious regrets about having voted for Trump. This very population opens the door for Bernie to win. On CSPAN a week or so ago they took calls from Republicans only asking if another Republican should challenge Trump in the primary. There were a lot who said they wanted another alternative and two out of 29 callers said they will vote for Bernie Sanders. A third saying she is changing parties and voting Democrat this time. I mean that is earth shattering in terms of opportunity. Donald Trump ans Bernie Sanders political ideologies are night and day away from each other so it wasn't ideology that was driving them as much as they wanted an authentic candidate. The DNC believed once they destroyed Bernie that all of his voters would flock to Hillary because in their mind there is no way someone as far to the left as Bernie would ever vote for Trump. But that was the fatal miscalculation they were to arrogant and out of touch to see. Running up to the election I hope all progressives do outreach to those Trump voters who now realize Trump was a liar. Bring them into the fold for a Bernie victory. Thanks again for the feedback.

Submitted on Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 8:48:33 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment