Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 14 (19 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
General News

Secret Government in Vermont is Bi-partisan

By       Message William Boardman       (Page 2 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)  Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 6/18/13

Author 14586
Become a Fan
  (32 fans)
- Advertisement -

Burlington City Attorney Eileen Blackwood argues, according to Seven Days, that her office's legal analysis is protected by attorney-client privilege, in a construct where both the attorney and the "client" work for the City of Burlington.   Protected by privilege, she has asserted, the legal analysis "must thus be treated as confidential." 

 

Since the law went onto effect in March, Progressive Party members of the city council began to have misgivings about its constitutionality.  They requested -- and received -- permission from the City Attorney to show the secret legal analysis to an outside counsel, John Franco, who served as a Burlington Assistant City Attorney from 1982 to 1989, when the Mayor was Bernie Sanders, now Vermont's junior U.S. Senator. 

 

- Advertisement -

Attorney Franco produced a five-page, single-spaced analysis dated June 4, in which he concluded that "this ordinance is neither lawful nor constitutional."  He has reinforced this conclusion with a three-page supplemental analysis

 

"Children love secret club houses. They love secrecy even when there's no need for secrecy. "  -- Donna Tartt  

- Advertisement -

 

Based on Franco's analysis of the ordinance, the five Progressive Party members introduced a resolution at the June 10 council meeting seeking to make the secret city attorney's office memo public. 

 

Democrats fought the motion fiercely.  Democrat Norm Blais, an attorney, made it personal, speculating irrelevantly that the resolution derived from "politicians' remorse."  Blais went on to argue that "this is not a question of transparency,"  [there are] sound reasons for having privileged communications with an attorney." 

 

While attorney-client privilege is widely recognized in law, Blais made no effort to explain how it applied to this governmental situation, where Democratic Mayer Miro Weinberger had made a campaign promise of greater governmental transparency. 

- Advertisement -

 

Council member Chip Mason, also a Democrat and a lawyer, chaired the committee that held three non-controversial public hearing on the ordinance.  At the council meeting he defended the "sanctity" of attorney-client privilege, calling it "not something we should be waiving." 

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?