Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (7 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
Life Arts

Revolution Goes Global: Elysium (2013)

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joe Giambrone     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 8/10/13

Author 43658
Become a Fan
  (28 fans)

I witnessed a similar Jihad against Avatar when it came out and then went on to top global box office records.  The natives aren't supposed to beat the white invaders, you see.  That's an "elaborate social metaphor," which isn't welcome in corporate suites.

Murdoch's NY Post gets downright frothy over the film.  Kyle Smith may have broken his keyboard banging out:

"But this isn't the first time a movie has strained so hard to issue a topical message -- the poor Latino Earthlings who keep trying to sneak onto the space station are even called 'illegals' -- that it lost track of basic storytelling imperatives."

So there's no way it could include a "topical message" about the "poor Latino Earthlings," and still deliver a story?  Too tall an order?  What those "imperatives" of Smith's are he never quite does explain, but I'm sure he should get on the phone to Hollywood post haste, since he clearly has the rule book all worked out somewhere.

So there's a sampling of the professional response to a deeply meaningful film about class inequality and extreme poverty, the inherent unfairness of today's very real global system.  Of course the film isn't perfect, and tastes really do vary -- I know that more than anyone --  but there are larger agendas at work here.  The people who hold these positions of cultural criticism really, really want to keep them.  That means they are part of the club.  That's how they are trained, and that's why they are hired.  Chomsky and Herman elaborated on this in Manufacturing Consent .

So, what are my honest, unpaid, unsponsored views on Elysium's weaknesses?  I do have a few.

I'm not sure how much pressure a man like Blomkamp is under working in the studio system with more than $100m of their money to gamble with.  The pressures to alter and to rely on old formulas are likely enormous.  That's how visual and audible cliche's end up in the film, the same types of things we've seen before.

The music swells and punches up, as is the standard operating procedure.  This was a noticeable weakness, without a lot of thought behind it.  The soundtrack could have used a rethinking, another opinion, some more variety and less beating you over the head at a bare minimum.

Jodie Foster is very good, but she may not have pulled off whatever accent she seems to have been going for.  This didn't bother me all that much, but others commented on the dubbing not being completely in sync during several scenes.

District 9 also resolved with a massive battle between the protagonist and antagonist.  There was a do-over quality here -- with Vickus, Sharlto Copley, unexpectedly flipped around to be the baddie.  Apparently he's been working out.  Blomkamp resorts to a big mano a mano bludgeoning Damon vs. Copley, to finish the film, which could have been more ingenious, something new, something worthy of the rest of the film.  The villain could have done himself in, perhaps, but we can all play armchair quarterbacks on how to climax a massive studio action picture.  Sometimes straight violence is what works.  What felt weak is that Copley may have been a tool of the real antagonist, a hired gun, but by film's climax he's no longer on the payroll.  He's not a part of the system then.  His vengeance against Damon isn't really in defense of the class system of oppression, but more of a personal vendetta.  That is a weakness that didn't quite resolve satisfactorily.  He was simply another obstacle by that point, and no longer represented the system that was the true enemy of most of humanity.  This subtle distinction weakened the story, and it should have been re-examined.

The following scene does, however, get the story back on track.  Damon's sacrifice to change the world and the entire solar system is a direct act against the status quo, a revolution, a defiance, a resetting of the rules.  One man with nothing to lose is a powerful force, the kind that sends shivers down the backs of tyrants.  What shakiness rattled the story is swiftly forgotten as the real stakes and the real meaning of Elysium are brought full circle.


Joe Giambrone publishes Political Film Blog and other nasty bits of bluster.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It
Joe Giambrone is an American author, freelance writer and filmmaker. Non-fiction works appear at International Policy Digest, WhoWhatWhy, Foreign Policy Journal, Counterpunch, Globalresearch, , OpedNews, High Times and other online outlets. His science fiction thriller Transfixion and his Hollywood satire (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is This the Man Who "Radicalized" Dzhokhar Tsarnaev?

The U.N. Would Never Lie to George Monbiot

The Future Children of Fukushima

Genocide and the Native American Experience

Nuclear Nightmare Worsens

Do I trust Christopher Nolan or his Batman?