42 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 50 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
General News   

Pope Francis' Vision for the World

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   4 comments
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

Under the major subheading "Social Dialogue for a New Culture" (paragraphs 199-202), Pope Francis says, "Some people attempt to flee from reality, taking refuge in their own little world; others react to it [i.e., reality] with destructive violence" (paragraph 199; he further discusses reality in paragraphs 204, 212, and 213). Then Pope Francis quotes himself as saying, "'A country flourishes when dialogue occurs between its many rich cultural components: popular culture, university culture, youth culture, artistic culture, technological culture, economic culture, family culture, and media culture'" (paragraph 199; bibliographic note 196; subsequently, he envisions the possible emergence of a new culture in paragraphs 215-221; he specifically discusses indigenous peoples and indigenous popular cultures in paragraph 220).

In Pope Francis' 2020 post-synodal apostolic exhortation about the Amazon region of South America, he describes his vision not only of indigenous peoples in the Amazon region, but by extension, of indigenous peoples around the world today:

Click Here

But also see my OEN article "Pope Francis' New Apostolic Exhortation Is Visionary" (dated February 14, 2020):

Click Here

Next, Pope Francis says, "Dialogue is often confused with something quite different: the feverish exchange of opinions on social networks, frequently based on media information that is not always reliable. These exchanges are merely parallel monologues" (paragraph 200).

Next, Pope Francis says, "Indeed, the media's noisy potpourri of facts and opinions is often an obstacle to dialogue, since it lets everyone cling stubbornly to his or her own ideas, interests, and choices, with the excuse that everyone else is wrong. It becomes easier to discredit and insult opponents from the outset than to open a respectful dialogue aimed at achieving agreement on a deeper level" (paragraph 201).

Next, Pope Francis says, "Lack of dialogue means that in these individual sectors people are concerned not for the common good, but for the benefits of power or, at best, for ways to impose their own ideas" (paragraph 202; the common good is a major theme of Catholic social teaching).

Under the minor subheading "Building together" (paragraphs 203-205), Pope Francis says, "Authentic social dialogue involves the ability to respect the other's point of view and to admit that it may include legitimate convictions and concerns. Based on their identity and experience, other have a contribution to make, and it is desirable that they should articulate their positions for the sake of a more fruitful public debate" (paragraph 203).

Two points:

(1) But the pope's wording here about "the ability to respect" reminds us that not all people have developed this ability. It is fine and good for the pope to characterize such people as "attempt[ing] to flee from reality" or "react[ing] to it with destructive violence" (paragraph 199), but people who have not developed the ability to respect others loom large as problematic.

(2) The pope's wording here about "the ability to respect the other's point of view and to admit that it may include legitimate convictions and concerns" certainly extends to his doctrinally conservative point of view.

For relevant reading, see the American scholar of religion Philip Jenkins' book The New Anti-Catholicism: The Last Acceptable Prejudice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003) and the American Jesuit theologian Mark S. Massa's book Anti-Catholicism in America: The Last Acceptable Prejudice (New York: Crossroad Publishing, 2003).

Under the minor subheading "The BASIS of Consensus" (paragraphs 206-210), Pope Francis says, "The solution is not relativism. Under the guise of tolerance, relativism ultimately leaves the interpretation of moral values to those in power, to be defined as they see fit" (paragraph 206). See paragraph 202, quoted above, for his discussion of how political power may not be aligned with the common good.

Under the next minor subheading "Consensus and truth" (paragraphs 211-214), Pope Francis says, "Acknowledging the existence of certain enduring values, however demanding it may be to discern them, makes for a robust and solid social ethics" (paragraph 211).

In the next paragraph, the pope says, "The dignity of others is to be respected in all circumstances, not because that dignity is something we have invented or imagined, but because human beings possess an intrinsic worth superior to that of material objects and contingent situations. This requires that they be treated differently [but differently from what? -- from one another? - or from the way we treat material objects?]. That every human being possesses an inalienable dignity is a truth that corresponds to human nature apart from all cultural change. For this reason, human beings have the same inviolable dignity in every age and no one can consider himself or herself authorized by particular situations to deny the conviction or to act against it" (paragraph 213).

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

Celebrating Walter J. Ong's Thought (REVIEW ESSAY)

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend