Orlando Wrap-up

We even have the owner of the World Trade Center stating on TV that the decision was made to pull WTC Building 7. That means the building was wired for controlled demolition.

None of this talk had any impact. Media ignored it or explained it away. My favorite example is the media explanation of Silverstein's statement on TV that the decision was made to pull the building. Media said that what Silverstein said or meant to say was that "the decision was made to pull the firemen out of the building." There was no fire of any significance in the building, and there were no firemen in the building to be called out. Watching the building come down in a controlled demolition you do not see a building in flames.

Foreknowledge was also associated with WTC Building 7's destruction. BBC TV reported the destruction of Building 7 about 20 minutes prior to its actual destruction, with the BBC announcer shown standing in front of the still-standing Building 7. There are so many anomalies associated with Building 7 that the building's destruction is not even mentioned in official reports.

Congress, the legal community, the President, and the American people did not demand an investigation based on the intriguing admissions and testimony from people intimately connected with the event.

The "dancing Israelis" also talked. These were the suspected Mossad agents who were observed filming and celebrating the airplane strikes on the towers. They were apprehended and arrested, but their obvious foreknowledge of the event did not fit the official story. They were quietly sent back to Israel where they appeared on Israeli TV and said that they were sent to New York to film the event. You can witness this at about the 6 minute mark on this video.

Of course, the translation could be deceptive, but the subscripts are there in Hebrew, so anyone who knows Hebrew can see if they correspond.

There is another interesting element in this film at about the 5:45 mark, one that the film-maker does not notice. The film shows the film we have all seen of an airliner hitting one of the towers. Notice that the airplane enters the building without any damage to the airliner or the building and explodes only after it is inside the building. Notice that the airliner hits the tower at an angle that has been calculated to have resulted in impact with eight floors, each reported to contain an acre of concrete, plus all the steel girders and supports, and the airliner does not break apart. The film shows that the airliner just effortlessly enters the building. How is this possible? Wouldn't the impact have resulted in the airliner breaking up and falling to the ground below? Why would the airliner explode only after it miraculously passed fully into the building and not upon impact with the building?

Consider how many years passed before anomalies such as this were even noticed.

In this video, Jim Fetzer overviews recent events ascribed to terrorists. Whether or not he convinces you, it is worth watching just as a lesson in learning how to notice anomalies in official accounts.

Unless Americans become more observant and act upon what they observe, American liberty is doomed.

An excellent Russian English language website that will add to your perspective is here.