Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 8/9/11

Nullifying the Future -- Tyranny of the Minority

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page. (View How Many People Read This)   2 comments
Author 50212
Become a Fan
  (35 fans)

Majority rule, and open voting (now under siege), are the only insurance against more top-down despotic control, whether military, financial, class, or oligarchic.  The supremacy of majority rule precedes America and the Constitution, adjudicating what any one generation elevates to do-or-die status.  Issues change, complexions change, personalities change, law and the Constitution change -- but what republic survives this mortal blow?  Even when the majority is wrong or mislead, or callously slow about human rights -- today for gays -- some absolute instrument must end debate, make decisions, and start action.  Rule by majority, exactly like Churchill's view of democracy, may well be the most dreadful form of government, except for all the others.


What Tea Party insurgencies evoke for me, if sustained and widespread, are divisions we haven't seen in 150 years ago when the South seceded.  What else, other than sharing history and this key value, better ties together our six very disparate regions?  Today, radical Tea Party ideology disputes our core assumption -- that the president and the majority (not white enough, nor religiously right) can and should rule wisely.  That defines the ultimate Tea Party sabotage, way beyond the debt ceiling nonsense.  Either we have majority rule or some self-appointed, minority by "faith alone" gang rules.  That's why Teavangelists are so dangerous, so inflexible they declare any who disagree are condemned as treasonous, wicked, and/or foreign subversives.


Tea Party -- Modern Confederacy?


Guess the percentage of defiant, white, southern, Confederates in 1861 -- only 20% of all Americans.  Not every one of the 5.5 million white southerners favored violent resistance, nor did all of the 22 million non-southerners adore Lincoln.  What about the 3.5 million slaves? Whatever the complex causes of the Civil War, its start was anything but democratic or done by popular vote.  No, an elite, plantation-slave owning gentry declared war via secessionist state houses.   Lincoln wasn't about to end slavery, inflame the South, or use force to impose federal law -- unless coerced.  


Now guess the percentage of Tea Partiers in 2011.  As polls range from 13% to 25%, let's call it no more than 20%, too.  52 House members define the Tea Party caucus and another 35 join their fun.  Now guess what percentage of the total 435 members that 87 represent.  Bingo, 20%.


Not to overplay the comparison, but today's batch of older, white, racially-insensitive conservatives also assert less government is automatically good, federal taxation suspect, the U. S. president's a crass, oppressive dictator -- and decentralization would solve all problems. Curiously, today's insurgents want to "take back their country" (just like southern Rebels), forever waxing nostalgic about fantasy golden ages (under Reagan).  Not so different from earlier delusions of the pre-abolition, ante-bellum golden age where happy slaves prospered because milk and honey flowed freely.  


There is, so far, one great difference: millions were killed and maimed because the Confederacy took arms against legitimate government.  The two-year old Tea Party can't yet match those casualties in its war against the majority -- and against reality.  But it's still young. Check out the Michael Lind linkage of "The Tea Party, the debt ceiling, and white Southern extremism," arguing "the goal, methods and passions of the Tea Party in the House are all characteristic of the radical Southern right."  Good rejoinder by Democratic strategist Ed Kilgore.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Must Read 3   Well Said 3   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Robert S. Becker Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

For a decade, Robert S. Becker's rebel-rousing essays on politics and culture analyze overall trends, messaging and frameworks, now featured author at OpEdNews, Nation of Change and RSN. He appears regularly at Dissident Voice, with credits (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Summer in the GOP Asylum: "Who are these guys?"

Deadline Looms To Fund Critical Ocean Plastic-Trash Film

Trickle-down Gulf Wreck-onomics

"Apocalypse Now' Vogue Engulfs Chicken Littles

Moses Kaput -- Rightwing Ten Commandments To Serve Looming Theocracy

"God Particle' Refudiates the Religious Right

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: