50 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 10/1/13

Netanyahu and Obama Seek "The Truth"

By       (Page 2 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   8 comments
Message James Wall
Become a Fan
  (19 fans)

In this one sentence, Netanyahu lays out his full-fledged paranoia, a belief that Iran would commit national suicide because it hates Jews. He also fails to support his allegation that Iran is "nuclear-armed." It is not. Pray for the Israeli people who have re-elected a man with these views.

The fact that Netanyahu continues as prime minister of a major industrial power is frightening. Paranoia on a scale this large, with at least 80 nuclear bombs awaiting use, is a major, major argument for eradicating all nuclear arms worldwide.

The New York Times asked veteran diplomat Gary Sick for a comment on Netanyahu's speech. Sick was polite but obviously surprised:

"Gary G. Sick, a former National Security Council staff member who specializes in Iran and who is now a research scholar at Columbia University, said he saw in Mr. Netanyahu's speech a somewhat ineffective attempt to abort the momentum that Mr. Rouhani had sought to build.

"'He was so anxious to make everything look as negative as possible he actually pushed the limits of credibility,' he said, noting that it seemed incongruous after Mr. Rouhani's diplomatic overtures and President Obama's cautious responses. 'It really is jarring to see that, the extreme element, and how far he was willing to push it. He did himself harm by his exaggerations.'"

The nuclear arms race is the most destructive, immoral, impractical, suicidal components of the world's military obsessions. All nuclear arms should all be banned. Unfortunately, in the realpolitik of the 21st century, the chances of a nuclear arms ban are slim to none.

Barack Obama has to be aware of the irrational views of Netanyahu. So it is that when Obama enters the world political boxing ring, he enters with an 800-pound gorilla on his back, a potent political force that keeps whispering in his ear, "is this good for Israel"?

A gorilla? Yes, a gorilla, which is one way to describe a particular reality whose name must not be spoken, even though it influences whatever is going on in the room of world politics, corporate strategy meetings or a marriage counseling session. The gorilla is always there, but as in the Harry Potter books, his name "must not be spoken."

The leader of the world's sole remaining super power functions in politics, domestic and foreign, with no reference to Israel's political prisoners, its checkpoints, its home demolitions, or its repressive occupation. Because our President does not speak "the name" except in the lofty phrase, "our ally," Obama focuses on Iran's nuclear program as something that concerns him.

Of course, the nation it really concerns is Obama's 800-pound gorilla which succeeded in getting Iraq neutered as a troublesome neighbor and is eager to do the same now with Iran and Syria.

Sykes-Picot agreementr

Israel seems to be redrafting the  Sykes-Picot agreement  originally written at the close of World War I. It was a plan  (shown above)  which two Western diplomats, Sir Mark Sykes, of Great Britain, and Georges Picot, of France, designed to create new Middle East national borders for the benefit of Western colonial victorious powers.

Israel, one of the world's leading nuclear powers, wants to make the Middle East nuclear free, with the exception of Israel, of course.

The best way to accomplish this, from Israel's perspective, is to break up many states into smaller, weaker "tribal states" which would pose no military threat to the reigning Middle East power, Israel.

Obama's speech did not  deal with new borders. Rather he revealed a distressing willingness to provide preferential treatment to Israel in the region:

"Since I took office, I've made it clear in letters to the supreme leader in Iran and more recently to President Rouhani that America prefers to resolve our concerns over Iran's nuclear program peacefully -- although we are determined to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. ... So these statements made by our respective governments should offer the basis for a meaningful agreement. We should be able to achieve a resolution that respects the rights of the Iranian people while giving the world confidence that the Iranian program is peaceful.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

James Wall Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

James Wall served as a Contributing Editor of The Christian Century magazine, based in Chicago, Illinois, from 1999 through 2017. From 1972 through 1999, he was editor and publisher of the Christian Century magazine. Many sources have influenced (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Does Israel Interfere in US Elections?

New York Times Flacks for Jewish Groups Against 15 Major Christian Leaders

How Iran Could Be The Next Neocon Target

Ten Swing States Could Decide the 2012 Election; Obama Leads in Nine of Them

White Evangelicals Stifle Values For Trump

What Protestants Could Learn from Ron Paul

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend