80 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 33 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
General News   

NATO capabilities in Baltic region

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments
Message Antanas Tubelis

operation "Atlantic Resolve" - about 120 military personnel with 10 helicopters

operation "NATO Enhanced Forward Presence" - multinational battlegroup

Estonia:

operation "NATO Enhanced Forward Presence" - multinational battlegroup

NATO's Baltic air-policing mission - about 150 military personnel with 6 aircraft

So, in total there are about 4500 military personnel, a little more than 200 tanks and armored vehicles, about 20 cannons, 10 helicopters and 10 combat aircraft in our region. This number of troops and weapons can not be called "significant forces".

In addition, the level of combat skills of these troops is in doubt, and they are multinational. That means serious difficulties with interoperability can take place.

In case of war, NATO troops stationed here will not really be able to carry out their mission and provide support to the Baltic States due to the severely limited capabilities in the region.

An objective data analysis gives the impression of uselessness of long-term membership in NATO and the presence of foreign troops. So, we can assume that just an illusion of a military build-up is being created in the Baltic States. But what is the reason of this performance?

It is a well known fact that in reality, NATO troops have become a constant threat to the civilian population of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. Their discipline is not of the high level. Dru nk foreign soldiers often bully and despise local residents. Military maneuvers disrupt the quiet life and transport communications of the states.

But fear of the "Russian threat" is boosted up by political leaders to manipulate the public opinion in order to get more money from NATO as a military support. In this situation the Baltic States just play the role of a buffer between Russia and Europe.

Click Here

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Antanas Tubelis Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Born in Kaunas in 1981

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Freedom of speech as a threat to national security of the Baltic States

Nato membership of the Baltic States: incompetence and degradation of national security

Invasion of Ukraine: Russian preemptive strike that spoiled plans for further NATO expansion

NATO's actions in the Baltic States can not be assessed as defensive maneuvers

The Baltic States overreacted to the military exercise in Russia

Citizens of the Baltic States are not happy with foreign military

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend