Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Meaningful Supreme Court Nominee Questions

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 41090
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ken Scott
11) Can the Supreme Court err? If so, what are the various methods to affect a remedy for such error?

12) What is the principle of Federalism and how does that principle manifest itself today? Is that manifestation consistent with the views of the Founders?

13) Many feel the Federal government should be limited and believe this is reflected in the "enumerated" powers of the Constitution. What is the meaning of the phrase 'enumerated powers' and what has been the trajectory of its meaning over time? What does this phrase mean to you and how would it enter into your judicial reasoning?

14) In general what is the constitutional authority for an earmark spending item where the federal budget funds a small local project that neither affects Interstate Commerce nor promotes the "general welfare" of the country at large?

15) If the percentage of citizens who essentially pay no income tax becomes a majority of the country's voters, what might be the likely impacts of that circumstance on the republic, its governance, and its longevity?

16) What is the definition of the "rule of law" that you intend to use as a judge?

Questions like these, regardless of Ms. Kagan's answers, can serve many purposes. Her hearings can be the vehicle for these issues to be placed and discussed in the public square, before and by the media, and more importantly between and among elected representatives in a public manner; in addition to revealing much about the nominee. Those discussions are necessary regardless of whether or not Ms. Kagan is confirmed.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Ken Scott Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ken Scott is a self-employed engineer (nuclear and computer) and patriot living in North Carolina. I also publish and comment at
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Health Care: Indefensible From Any Angle

Meaningful Supreme Court Nominee Questions

Cure Congressional Corruption Act of 2009

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: