Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 4 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 6/27/15

Marriage Equality, The SCOTUS And Reality

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page. (View How Many People Read This)   2 comments
Author 7008
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Roberts
Become a Fan
  (18 fans)

Polygamy preferred

Today, at least in the Western world, monogamy may seem central to marriage. However, polygamy was and still is common throughout history. From Jacob, to Kings David and Solomon, Biblical men often had anywhere from two to thousands of wives.

Monogamy established

Over time religions, in particular the Roman Catholic Church became bitterly embroiled over marriage protocols as kings and the nobility wanted to have "dalliances" with many women and felt that the church was a fetter and humbug. Monogamy became the guiding principle for Western marriages sometime between the sixth and the ninth centuries. The Church eventually prevailed with monogamy becoming central to the notion of marriage by the ninth century.

State or church

Religious-based marriages in the West were originally contracts between the families of two partners, with the Catholic Church and the state staying out of it. However, in 1215, the church decreed that partners had to publicly post notices (on the town bulletin board and then in local newspapers) of an impending marriage in a local parish, or village to cut down on the frequency of invalid marriages (the Church eliminated that requirement in the 1980s). Still, until the 1500s, the Church accepted a couple's word that they had exchanged marriage vows, with no witnesses or corroborating evidence needed.

Love matches

About 250 years ago, the notion of love matches became an integral part of the marriage construct for the first time - meaning marriage was based on love and possibly sexual desire. But mutual attraction in marriage wasn't important until about a century ago.

Against this historical backdrop, gay marriage and sexuality threatened the ideal image of the modern family. Firstly, it challenges the family's rationale as a unit in the reproduction of labor power, and secondly, the very ideology of traditional marriage and the family. The very idea of same sex partners existing and living besides "traditional" man-wife families, an essential construct for the nuclear family, is difficult for many, especially those in the religious community, to accept.

The fact is that you cannot, no pun intended, divorce marriage from class based politics and economics. I posit the fact that "traditional" working class families and their promotion by big capitalist interests was a way to ultimately ensure a cheap supply of necessary labor. Thus, this nuclear family built on the fabled and idealistic foundation of "legal marriage" -- sanctioned and "blessed" by the church -- became the accepted and only way of living.

In those days, homosexuality was frowned on in the American society and gay and lesbians had to remain "in the closet" -- they could not "come out." Further, with organized religion's blessings and complicity, the United States Courts, aided and abetted by the government, passed laws that criminalized homosexuality and homosexuals. These laws were overturned over many years in a bloody and brutal struggle rife with ignorance, discrimination, bigotry and intolerance.

Today, all that has changed is the capitalist system no longer embraces or respects the nuclear family. Socio-economic pressures and what Karl Marx called "money being the nexus of all marriages" in capitalist society has resulted in increased divorce rates and the rise of single parents with fewer children being born in wedlock.

So as long as the traditional family is an economic unit, for rearing children and satisfying the consumption needs of the adults and the capitalist system, homosexuals are bound to be considered deviant: the homosexual male is not seen to fit the man's role as the provider for wife and children, and the homosexual female is not seen to act the role of mother and wife. The contemporary family is not only a prison for those in it, but also enslaves those who do not fit into the sex-role stereotypes connected with it.

Marriage Equality may be the law of the land today but its raised many more questions and deepened the acute class divisions in United States society that will influence ALL marriage issues - for many years to come. This is not over by a long shot.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Roberts Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

MICHAEL DERK ROBERTS Small Business Consultant, Editor, and Social Media & Communications Expert, New York Over the past 20 years I've been a top SMALL BUSINESS CONSULTANT and POLITICAL CAMPAIGN STRATEGIST in Brooklyn, New York, running (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

October 19, 1983 and The Murder Of Maurice Bishop

Why Black History Is important

Wordsmiths And The Delusional

Blacks Killing Blacks

Black On Black Crime: A Critique

2014 FIFA World Cup: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: