Or, if you must whip up some crazy dreams of armed insurrection against the U.S. government -- by distorting the original intent of the Second Amendment and allowing weapons of war into the hands of unstable people -- that serves the purpose of putting everyone on edge and creating useful insecurity. [See Consortiumnews.com's "The Right's Second Amendment Lies."]
Similarly, some right-wing public officials, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry, offer loose talk about "secession" in which the states of Real America would secede from the Union of the Other America, much as the Confederate states seceded in the early 1860s to protect the institution of slavery.
And, if you must disrupt the economy of the Obama-controlled Other America by threatening to make the United States default on its debts, that has benefits, too. Certainly, before Election 2012, such disruptions helped keep unemployment high and boosted Mitt Romney's electoral chances.
But even after the election, there remains a necessity to beat down the U.S. economy, to make it "scream," whether by implementing major spending cuts as in the current "sequester" or by forcing periodic crises in the functioning of government like standoffs over government shut-downs and debt defaults.
Bad Is Good
Certainly, there is no interest in supporting public spending on infrastructure, research or education, which might only put people back to work or make the government look useful. Today's Right doesn't care that the predictable results of austerity -- as Europe has shown -- is a likely double-dip recession and more pain, indeed that appears to be the plan.
After more years of high unemployment and decaying services, the Right can then pound away at the talking point that Obama's modest policy reforms, including slight increases in tax rates on the rich, failed. The political space might be created for restoring full right-wing control of Congress in 2014 and over the entire federal government in 2016.
Then, more permanent alterations in democracy can be installed to give substantially more weight to the votes of Real Americans while ensuring that Other Americans never get their hands on real power.
Perhaps President Obama's biggest miscalculation has been his lack of appreciation for how radical the Right and its chief political vehicle, the Republican Party, have become. In 2009, he assumed that the depth of the financial crisis would force greater cooperation with his proposals for saving the auto industry, stimulating the economy and achieving some reform of health care. Instead he faced near unanimous GOP opposition.
With his "base" demoralized in 2010, Obama saw the Republican Party and its Tea Party faction make major gains in Congress, seizing control of the House and growing even more emboldened about using the filibuster to tie up the Senate. GOP governors and statehouses also moved to reshape congressional districts to enhance Republican power.
In 2011, to stop the GOP from forcing a default on the U.S. debt -- and throwing the world's economy into crisis -- Obama agreed to an unpalatable across-the-board cut in future spending, called "the sequester." By doing so, Obama at least kept the U.S. economy on a slight growth path through Election 2012.
Though Obama won reelection decisively and Democrats out-polled Republicans in congressional races, the Republicans retained control of the House largely due to the aggressive gerrymandering of districts. Combined with the Senate filibuster, the House majority has given the GOP effective veto power over Obama's agenda.
Heading into his second term, Obama is surely less starry-eyed than he was in 2009, but he continues to underestimate what is confronting him from the more extreme elements of the Republican Party -- the neo-Confederates, the Tea Partiers, the Ayn Rand acolytes and the Christian fundamentalists. These groups are not at all interested in making things work in the Other America; they want pretty much everything to fail.
These extremists -- financed by the likes of the Koch Brothers and other anti-government ideologues -- view Other America as an enemy state that must be hobbled, put back in its place and forced to let Real America reassert control. If that can be achieved in 2014 and 2016, Real America would then move with more determination to reshape the electoral system to give even greater weight to its votes and less value to the votes of Other America.
To hold back the demographic shift toward a "multicultural America," "traditional America" must impose a form of American apartheid, that is, legal arrangements to ensure future white control even though non-whites and urban youth might make up the majority. In effect, they would be given some lesser status as citizens. Their votes might count as, say, three-fifths of a person.
That is the project that the Republican Party began in earnest in 2011 with laws to restrict voting times, to impose new obstacles for casting ballots, and to reshape districts to maximize the electoral clout of rural whites (while minimizing the influence of urban non-whites and other city dwellers).