Until quite
recently, therefore, "Videocracy" was alive and well in
This leads directly to a critical consideration on
the possible risk of over-exposure, which could, in the long run, threaten to
alienate the very people who are supposed to be attracted and fascinated,
There
are credible indications that this could
well be the case in
Other
indications are the catastrophic fall in the former Prime Minister's personal
popularity and the unpredicted growth of the unabashedly populist "anti-political"
movement led by erstwhile comedian Beppe
Grillo who now leads what could possibly be the second largest political party
in the country. It is significant that Grillo himself, who, after all, has his
roots in show business and whose political movement is on a constant upswing,
has forbidden his candidates from appearing on the numerous "talk shows" on
Italy's public and private TV channels.
A further,
and rather significant question arises from these considerations, and people are
wondering if "Videocracy's" ultimate effect will be the end of the democratic process as it has been known
until now with, perhaps, a return to a quasi-Grecian model based essentially on local politics,
and with the internet (Twitter and Social Networks) substituting the Agora.
This is not a vain or otiose question, but a consideration which deserves attention and careful reflection.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).