576 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 68 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 5/2/13

Indeed, "Why are we doing this?"

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   4 comments

Dave Lefcourt
Message Dave Lefcourt
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

The AMA supports the 1975 World Medical Association's Tokyo Declaration that forbids doctors to use their medical knowledge to facilitate torture. If a prisoner makes an unimpaired and rational judgment to refuse nourishment he should not be fed artificially."

While in fact the U.S. military policy states "It can and should preserve the life of the detainee by forcing him to eat if necessary." President Obama supports this military policy, (even the British wouldn't dare stop Mahatma Gandhi from conducting his hunger strikes against British colonialism prior to their granting India its independence in 1947).

But let's get to the bitter nitty gritty of Guantanamo, the detainees held indefinitely without charges and due process and their hunger strike that is forcing the president to confront the horror that is Guantanamo.

The Bush mob believed since Guantanamo was not on U.S. soil along with their contrived "war on terror" gave them the authority to hold suspects indefinitely "until the end of hostilities, it could keep these men in stir, out of site and out of mind, similar to the Soviet gulags that kept political prisoners locked away without charges or a trial.

But Guantanamo flew in the face of the American justice system where indefinite detention of suspects was clearly illegal and the subterfuge of the "war on terror" (which is and never was a war) could never legally justify Guantanamo's existence.

Now the hunger strike is clearly embarrassing Obama. It makes hollow his declaration in 2009 to close the facility within a year.

Obama's hand wringing and anguish over Guantanamo and the plight of the detainees is commensurate with his rhetorical ability.

  But action on his part is what is needed. He could issue an executive order to close Guantanamo, charge and try the detainees in civilian courts or release them.

  Some in Congress would bemoan their being bypassed in the decision process but in this instance it would be the right thing for the president to do.      

 

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lefcourt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend