34 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 7/7/15

God or gods, a Train of Thought That Ends Up Illuminating What We Need Illuminated

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   27 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Andrew Schmookler
Become a Fan
  (31 fans)
The Hebrews/Jews were sandwiched in between mighty empires -- the Egyptian (from whom, the Bible says, they suffered four centuries of slavery), the Bablyonian (the generations of captivity), the Assyrian (the defilement of the Temple).

Not for them were there many opportunities to satisfy the "We're # 1" kind of lust for domination.

As a result of their experience ("the weak suffer what they must"), these Hebrews had reasons to crave a world better ordered, and ruled by a power of an emphatically moral character. Those reasons grew out of their traumatic experience of the lack of a moral order and of power being wielded against them in evil ways.

If this is where the explanation of the contrast lies, then the question arises: Which culture's choice comes out strengthened, and which weakened, by this picture? Or, to put it another way, which side should we be listening to, if either?

I make no pretense to know about what kind of divine beings there might be, or if there is anything like that in the cosmos or not. But here is how I might see a relevant case being made in either direction.

On the one hand, one could say this picture discredits the Hebrew's approach. One might say that their choice was so clearly motivated by their need -- that this idea of a moral power and order at the center of the universe was, for a victim society, a kind of opiate, alleviating some real pain -- that it seems less likely that they were coming to the truth.

"At least things make sense, in some ultimate sense," people in their painful position might be eager to conclude. "At least in some invisible world of God's justice, the wrongs will be righted."

That would be comforting for a much-victimized people to believe.

But on the other hand, one might reasonably argue that their experience could lead them to see more deeply into the way things are and into the profoundly moral challenge at the heart of the human condition.

The people who have experienced victimhood -- having been conquered, killed, hauled into slavery -- are driven by their suffering to see deeply into the big picture. And what they see is the reality of the battle between good and evil, and the moral obligation to serve the good and defend the sacred.

They know that injustice is bad, because they experience its badness in their bodies and their souls.

In this way, their experience compels that people think about the deep problems at the heart of human civilization, where the problem of uncontrolled power has subjected the human world to an ongoing force of brokenness that stretches through the millennia. (And, indeed, has erupted in all its ugliness in our times here in America.)

Anyway, those are the places my wondering lately took me, when I somehow stumbled into the question of God or gods, and the mystery of how worldviews of these two cultures came to be so different on so fundamental a question about the structure of reality.

Not just any two cultures, either. These two --Athens and Jerusalem-- together, constitute the two basic building blocks -- the two main cultural streams out of the ancient world -- that have shaped the civilization of which we are in America are part.

I say there are important truths from both of them.

Hurrah for the Greeks, for example, for providing some of the important tools for clear thinking as a way of understanding things, and for giving our civilization some foundation for pursuing truth through the use of reason and evidence.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Andrew Schmookler Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia's 6th District. His new book -- written to have an impact on the central political battle of our time -- is (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Like Colbert? Article Plus Critique

Mel Gibson's Rant as Profound Clue

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

How Important is the Loss of Friendship?

# 8 Beliefs that Make Liberal America Weak: Barriers to the Source of Moral and Spiritual Passions

Power and Corruption: Just What Is Their Relationship?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend