50 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

God Bless the Child

By       (Page 2 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments
Message Richard Hirschhorn

 Today’s bigots do not make that argument. Like every group that cannot control themselves; that needs to publicly proclaim that they are superior to another group, they raise up among us their excuses to explain this un-American behavior. In the case of sexism, we are given a pedestal In the case of white racism we are given the transparent and despicable device called “separate but equal”.

 

 This is the position of our president-elect, Barack Obama. Too clever to assert incompetence, and too learned to argue that gays do not want to marry, he politics the “civil union” card. “Civil union” is nothing but the puerile re-assertion of “separate but equal”.

 

 Mr. Obama, if civil union is “good enough”, “just the same” or “serves the same purpose”, why didn’t you and Michelle chose that path?

 

   We are all told that you acquired fine legal training, and that, in fact, you have a particular expertise in Constitutional Law. How then do you explain your support for the doctrine of separate but equal? How do you explain using the same reasoning, the same tired old arguments, that oppressed Americans for so long?

 

 Perhaps you were out of the class campaigning for head of the “Harvard Review” the day they explained why Thurgood Marshall argued that “separate but equal” “caused substantial psychological damage”? Was the ivy in your eyes when it was explained how the Warren court decided that “separate but equal” “created a sense of inferiority”?

 

 The rap, tap, tat of the drums, the clop, clop, clop of the rider-less stallion chorused with weeping as the box bearing Franklin Delano Roosevelt, like an empty chair, rolled past.

 

 After twelve years, a grieving nation buried an apostle of change. Because this remained a southern city, a segregated capitol of “separate but equal”, some of those tears were for the hope that died, the change that had not occurred. For some crying, FDR had turned out to be only a man after all. A politician, he had to make a deal with racism to get his “New Deal” passed. The “negro question” would have to wait.

 

 Words are funny. One day they mean one thing, and then, presto, like politicians, they mean something else. Words like “liberal” and “separate but equal” and “civil union” and “change” and “freedom” and “equality” and “civil rights”.

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Hirschhorn Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

shopkeeper 1976-2001
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

God, and the death of Atheism

Global Warming

Owls, Apple Pie and Socialism

Janet Napolitano- of size and security matters

Reagan Was Right, Stalin Was Wrong

Barack Obama and Michelle-separate no more

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend