Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Continued Lack of Testing Partnerships in East Asia as decades roll on

By       Message Kevin Anthony Stoda     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 5798
Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

My rationale for focusing on the criteria (a) to (i) above in scoring my junior high students practice speeches stemmed from the fact that non-native speakers of English, especially in Taiwan, are weak in these areas of communication.

By evaluating these areas of a short 2 to 2 1/2 minute speech, as an English language instructor, I have selected criteria which will have great beneficial backwash on how English is studied, learned, practiced, and taught.

SIMPLE?

While the local audience of students and teachers was still trying to guess which criteria the Board of Education members had chosen this 2011 to evaluate the different speaker's efforts that afternoon, one of the judges stood up and began to explain. (I personally had originally thought that the three judges had intentionally avoided giving the top four awards to those competing-speakers who had already won awards earlier that same day in the local English spelling and vocabulary contest.)

After congratulating all fourteen students for their efforts, the judge immediately began to outline to the audience what it actually took, in her opinion, to give a good speech. Here were the overt criteria she outlined first and foremost. This judge stated that the speakers were called on to emphasize and demonstrate the skills explained in the acronym SIMPLE.   This judge explained that SIMPLE stood for:

S - smile at the audience

I - intonation - use it properly when speaking

M - consider the manner in which you move, stand and gesture

P - pronunciation - always pronounce words clearly

L - love your audience and show you love what you are doing or talking about

E - use eye contact with the audience at all times

The judge, who spoke English fairly well, admitted that, back in her day, when she was in junior high, she would never have had the confidence or training to give a good or great speech.

I immediately recognized that (1) only some of the criteria overlapped with my own criteria, which I've explained above, the (a) through (i) criteria intended to have beneficial backwash for students, teachers and English language education as a whole.

I also noted that (2) the weighting of SIMPLE over-emphasized form to the exclusion of content. Moreover, even though this judge admitted that the organization of a speech was important, (3) form and style were being weighted over organization, too. Finally, even though the judge also noted that global vocabulary errors, i.e., those vocabulary errors which extremely confuse the listening audience, could lose the competition for someone, (4) grammar and vocabulary were otherwise not emphasized generally in this particular speech contest.

Later, on my way riding the ferry back to my home island that afternoon, I laughed and explained to my colleagues that what we had thus observed had neither been a speaking contest nor a speech contest based upon the emphasized criteria of SIMPLE. Rather, through the judges' emphasis on form-over-content, it was a look-like-you-are-giving-a-great-speech contest. In short, one needed neither great content nor great organization nor a firm grasp of verb tenses and vocabulary to succeed in doing well in speech. One just had to smile, love the audience and act like one was speaking with the less-said-the better (because the speaker who says least has less chance of making a pronunciation error).

On TESTing and on ConTESTS

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://eslkevin.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/3-big-paradigms-hol

KEVIN STODA-has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.--He sees himself as a peace educator and have been-- a promoter of good economic and social development--making-him an enemy of my homelands humongous DEFENSE SPENDING and its focus on using weapons to try and solve global (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

BED-INs and Other Protests Needed Now

GULF CIVIL SOCIETY FORUM calls for Gulf Monarchies to abandon absolutism and to adopt European-style Parliaments

TRIBE, TRIBALISM AND CULTURAL CHANGE-KUWAIT 2008

PHILIPP ROESLER, of Vietnamese Descent. to Head the Health Ministry in Germany, as his own Party Plans to Push for more

Mitigation of Tsunami's and Earthquakes--Has JAPAN DONE ENOUGH?

A WORLD OF PRETENDERS: Partial Review of the Filipino Novel, THE PRETENDERS by F. Sionil Jose