reprinted from dailykos.com
UPDATE:This is mentioned in one of the linked articles, but PZ Myers has put out a call to action on Pharyngula. I'll bring it here:Unleash the Kraken on Peter G. Palumbo!The post contains a link to the podcast of the radio show where Palumbo made the remark in question. (h/t: WayBeyondSoccerMom)
January 15, 2012 at 6:43 pm PZ Myers
Palumbo is a Rhode Island representative; he just called one of his constituents, Jessica Ahlquist, an "evil little thing" who was "being coerced by evil people". I think he needs to apologize. No, scratch that; he needs to lose his next election. Contact him! Palumbo's email address is email@example.com. His office phone number is (401) 785-2882.
(Nota bene: There ain't gonna be a title change. I stand by it.)
The issue has been controversial. The School Committee held a number of public hearings, during which tempers flared and people both for and against the banner filled the auditorium at Western Hills Middle School to voice their opinions. Based on those discussions, it appears a majority supports leaving the banner intact. But Ahlquist and the ACLU remain critical of it, citing the obvious religious nature of the phrase "Our Heavenly Father" and "Amen" within a school setting.
"A Christian Catholic prayer may bring comfort to the majority of students in my school," said a confident and composed Ahlquist, who sat surrounded by her father, two lawyers, the ACLU Executive Director Steve Brown, a reverend and a rabbi. "But it sends a different message to the large population of students of other faith or in my case, none. I firmly believe that it should not be on display in a public school."
I find it disheartening that the issue would even be controversial in the first place.
The Court's decision in this case established the "Lemon test", which details the requirements for legislation concerning religion. It consists of three prongs:
The government's action must have a secular legislative purpose;
The government's action must not have the primary effect of either advancing or inhibiting religion;
The government's action must not result in an "excessive government entanglement" with religion.
If any of these 3 prongs are violated, the government's action is deemed unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Well, there you go. It is difficult to imagine a banner with an inscription, beginning, "Heavenly Father" and ending with, "Amen" in a public school auditorium having any secular purpose, or not being considered to advance one religion while inhibiting others (or the lack thereof, in the instant case) but the attempt was made.
"Roger Williams, the founder of the Rhode Island Colony, opposed government sanctioned or mandated expressions of religious significance and [the school district] attempted to reject and trivialize the message to preserve it," Labinger said, noting thatschool officials aruged there was no religious significance to the mural and emphasized its historic value.
Emphasis mine: see, "tea, weak."
And a federal judge didn't buy that one either, ordering that the banner be removed.
Get this: The auditorium has been locked while the district considers whether to appeal the ruling.
That said, the followers of the Prince of Peace have responded to the judge's ruling by issuing various levels of fatwa on this young girl.
From the JesusFetusFajitaFishsticks blog come various screenshots of the threats of violence made against Jessica Ahlquist.
Including such messages of unconditional love as:
"shes not human shes garbage"
"I think everyone should just fight this girl"