Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

8 House Members View Draft Bill on Independent Science/Tech Probe of WTC 1, 2, 7 Collapses

By       (Page 15 of 25 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   11 comments
Author 3854
Message Barbara Ellis

 (4) That the phenomenon of Martensitic Transformation (phase change) was present whereby steel heated above 1,335ºF recrystalizes as austenite and softens and/or melts as temperatures increase. Thus, jet fuel from the aircraft was said to have caused fires hot enough to reach those temperatures simultaneously and throughout the Towers 110 floors of steel columns and beams.

In the case of the 47-story Building No. 7, minimal fires said to be from Tower debris never reached temperatures sufficient to blow out the windows, and FEMA could not single out a definitive cause for the collapse.

(5) That steel floor trusses were of a lighter weight than the columns and beams and therefore subject to a more rapid Martensitic Transformation from the jet-fueled fires. The theory provided suggests that when heat rapidly expanded the trusses, it caused “thermal bowing.” That, in turn, exerted “pull-in forces” on the exterior columns thus compressing the trusses. Compounded by shear forces within the trusses, the “diagonal struts” buckled, setting off cracking and buckling of an exterior column wall. The “explosive” sounds were attributed to the snapping of columns and beams.

That supposedly set off a chain-reaction, forcing tilting  of the Towers, which then spread buckling to all walls and into the structures’ core. The combination of tilting top sections and their overwhelming weight then were to have led to the buildings’ rapid vertical collapses  nearly into their own footprints. This phenomenon is called “progressive failure” (pancaking).

The phenomenon of dust instead of concrete rubble was explained as an ongoing energy transfer sufficient enough “to have crushed more than 90% of the floor concrete to particles well within the observed particle size range.” Too, doubts about the concrete quality were raised about the possibilities of “freezing during curing or too much air or water being added during construction.”

The volcano-like plumes of smoke were attributed to compression of air in elevator and air-conditioning shafts as floors collapsed. The “squibs” (ejections of materials) seen in photographs and videography were said to be light reflected from broken bits of  aluminum cladding from the buildings’ exterior. 

Further, the broken windows and detached marble panels in the lobby and witness accounts of explosions first occurring in the basements were attributed to “torque forces” from aircraft strikes above the 92nd floor in No. 1 and the 78th floor in No. 2.

As to molten metal that reportedly burned for weeks under the sites of No. 1 and 7, the cause was said to be the WTC’s still-operational continuous battery systems. 

(6) That NIST panelists admitted in their 10,000-page WTC report (October 2007) the free-fall vertical collapses of the Towers——by symmetrical progression——in less than 11 seconds just outside their footprints, was “inexplicable.”

Their most important conclusion was that though the Tower fires were fed by building furnishings, these oxygen-starved, jet-fueled fires never exceeded 500ºF.  Steel only begins to  soften at 1,000ºF and melts at 1,500ºF, they noted.

They also ruled out “pancaking” because resistance met by floors below would have added considerable time to actual collapse durations: 110 seconds minimum. 

(7) That


the collapses were attributable either to  missiles or bomb-laden military aircraft, not commercial airliners. This theory challenges the evidence of on-site witnesses, passenger lists and the victims’ family and friends. Yet Air Force and Air Force Academy sources have speculated that the planes could have been E-10s. 

Aircraft designers, pilots and civil aviation examiners also are aware that any jet aircraft could be taken over remotely. For example, the Global Hawk remote-control system is frequently cited in the literature concerning the Department of Defense’s weaponry.

But after the air attack on the North Tower, some spectators said a plane struck the South Tower. Minute examination of the photographic and videographic evidence has suggested the possibility of a pod in the undercarriage of a plane that could have contained high-yield explosives. 

(8) That when steel (not concrete) buildings are impacted by aircraft, destroying several columns and beams——as demonstrated in 1945 when a B-25D struck the Empire State Building——the stress is “redistributed.” Remaining columns become a “truss network to bridge over the missing columns.” The Towers’ head structural engineer, John Skillings, noted that they were designed to withstand the same kinetic energy whether expended by a Boeing 707 or a 767.

 As to heat dissolving steel beams and columns, even fires involving 10,000 gallons of jet fuel——combined with office materials——none exceeded 500ºF, far too low to have any impact on those structures. If they had had impact, structural experts have posited that the collapses would have been gradual, in less than 10 seconds, because the beams and columns would not have gradually relinquished their structural strength.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22  |  23  |  24  |  25

 

Valuable 4   Must Read 3   Interesting 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Barbara Ellis Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Dr. Ellis is the principal of Ellis & Associates, LLC, a writers group in Portland OR, a nominee for a Pulitzer Prize in history in 2004 (The Moving Appeal), and a former journalism professor at Louisiana's McNeese State University and Oregon State (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

8 House Members View Draft Bill on Independent Science/Tech Probe of WTC 1, 2, 7 Collapses

Solar Desalination: Surviving Water's Coming Armageddon

Shakespeare Didn't Need College Algebra

Hit Those Democratic Betrayers on HR 2206 Where They Live