44 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 10/25/10

Capitalism and Freedom: a Critical Review

By       (Page 11 of 13 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments

Friedman: The income limitations quite properly imposed for the occupancy of public housing at subsidized rentals have led to a very high density of "broken" families " P. 180

Note: I actually agree with Friedman (don't faint) on the point that dispersing low income families through neighborhoods containing higher income families is desirable. But how often do higher income families welcome lower income families as neighbors? If, for example, families received a subsidy to live in a specific house or apartment, then the "income limitations quite properly imposed" could be altered. Instead of forcing a family to move when their income improves, just remove them from the subsidy program. (I must give credit for this idea to Jane Jacobs, author of The Death and Life of Great American Cities.) Also, Friedman falls into the "matriarchy" trap described in "The Moynihan Report" which assumed that females raising families in a matriarchal society are automatically at a disadvantage and therefore less successful. My own master's paper explored this thesis exhaustively in a national sample of the black population, and found no differences by sex of parent or other adult caregiver when other factors were held equal. Pro-regulation

I enjoyed this category, because I found a surprising number of statements that either implicitly or even explicitly acknowledged that there is a legitimate role for government to establish the rules of the game and to regulate monetary and economic matters.

Friedman: The existence of a free market does not of course eliminate the need for government. On the contrary, government is essential both as a forum for determining the "rules of the game" and as an umpire to interpret and enforce the rules decided on. P. 15

Note: Friedman is PRO government regulation!

Friedman: In summary " economic activity ... presumes that we have provided, through government, for the maintenance of law and order to prevent coercion of one individual by another, the enforcement of contracts voluntarily entered into, the definition of the meaning of property rights, the interpretation and enforcement of such rights, and the provision of a monetary framework. P. 27

Note: Role of government:
1) law and order
2) prevent coercion
3) enforce contracts
4) define property rights
5) interpret/enforce property rights
6) provide a monetary framework

Friedman: " the Federal Reserve System " was given the power to create more cash if a widespread demand should arise " and " monetary crises could be completely avoided. P. 48

Note: Friedman argues the Fed should have done more of this in the 1930's. By implication, he would favor a strong governmental role in the financial crises that reached epic proportion in late 2008.

Friedman: " how " can we establish a monetary system that is stable "? The only way " that offers promise is to try to achieve a government of law instead of men by legislating rules for the conduct of monetary policy " P. 51

Note: Friedman is in favor of at least some forms of governmental regulation of the financial sector! We need rules!

Friedman: " a legislated rule instructing the monetary authority to achieve a specified rate of growth in the stock of money. P. 52

Note: Again, government should regulate with strict monetary policy.

Friedman: Is it tolerable that these public functions of taxation, expenditure, and control be exercised by the people who happen at the moment to be in charge of particular enterprises " P. 134

Note: Sounds to me like he is arguing for social responsibility to be lodged in government regulation.

Friedman: " what determines the average level of prices and wages is the amount of money in the economy " P. 135

Note: This sounds very Keynesian to me. Since it is an acknowledged function of our national government to define our financial system, including to create money, then if wages and prices have fallen and we want them to rise, we should "print money."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

David Klassen Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Born in Newton KS in 1943. Educated at U of Kansas and U of Chicago, PhD in sociology. Developed and wrote computer programs for statistical research, for dental clinics, medical clinics, hospitals. Retired in 2003. Lives in Hannibal MO (my wife's (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Capitalism and Freedom: a Critical Review

Flanagan South Pipeline, the new Keystone XL?

My Letter to Senator Claire McCaskill About the Budget Battle

Obama's Covert Contracts and the Party of "No"

Incomprehensible!

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend