Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 13 (13 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

100 Anniversaries for 2013

By       Message Ellen Kadransky     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/15/12

- Advertisement -

   100 YEAR   ANNIVERSARIES   FOR   2013

We have three important anniversaries coming up that were of vital importance in the governing of this country.   They were laws that took years of work by politicians over all of the 48 states.   People are generally resistant to change, but through the past 100 years   a large portion of our population has been grateful   for the passing of these laws.  

Many may recall learning about the two Constitutional Amendments and the Act mentioned in this piece, but probably not much discussion about them in their years in schools.   Usually there is not enough time to explain what they do and why they were needed.

First I will talk about the 16 th Amendment to the Constitution which was the Income Tax.   The Socialist Workers had advocated a graduated Income tax in 1887.   The Populist Party demanded "graduated income tax" on its platform in 1892.   The Democratic Party led by William Jennings Bryan advocated   an income tax in 1894.

- Advertisement -

36 states finished ratifying the Income Tax Amendment on February 3, 1913.   Six more ratified after that and two never considered it.   After passing Congress it was signed into law by President Wilson.   In 1913 about one percent   of the population had to pay and that was on only one percent of their income.   There were generous exemptions and deductions.   Persons thinking they would like to do away with the income tax should think how they would like much more tax on everything they buy or on transactions and services.

The 17 th Amendment transferred Senatorial Elections from State Legislatures to popular election by people of the state.   The Senate fiercely resisted the change to the direct elections in 1913.   Recently Justice Scalia said that the decline of states' rights can be traced to the Amendment.   However, no fewer than 14 seats remained vacant between 1890 and 1900.   In 1912 the leading historian, George Haynes, wrote that legislative election of senators "led to assaults, fist fights and threats of   organized attack and resistance."

For some thirty years a grass-roots campaign worked to get approval for the direct elections.   The Senate refused to approve it in 1910.   However, the next Congress (1912) ratified the 17 th Amendment taking less than 11 months (one of the fastest in history).   The date was May 31, 1913

- Advertisement -

As for right-wing objections still around today, some people believe there would be less progressivism if the legislature still appointed the senators to Congress.    However,   most believe that the state governments   do not have a right to control Congress.  

The Federal Reserve Act was also passed on December the 23 rd , 1913.    It served to stabilize our banking system because all of the banks were absorbed into a national system.   Greater flexibility in use of credit and a new type of currency was authorized.   This was supposed to serve as a safeguard against speculation.  

My suggestions to commemorate   the two amendments   and   the Act passed in 1913.   In memory of all those who worked so hard on the 16 th Amendment, I think we should work to get a better and more usable tax code and dedicate it to those who were a part of that action.   As for the 17 th Amendment, we should work to honor our previous senators by eliminating all possibility of filibusters in the U.S. Senate.

There was a panic in 1907 which made it necessary to get the Federal Reserve Act together and put it to use.   Work on improving the federal money system should be continued by the applicable committees of our governing bodies.

A century ago we were in a period of progressive activism.   The churches, schools, newspapers   all worked   for government reforms and the lessening of corruption in local and national life.   Perhaps the recognition of what happened in that era could be looked at by the progressive sides of both political parties.   Moving   backwards as so many in the Republican   party seem to want to do is not an acceptable choice.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Free Lance Writer. OpEds published in Daily News and other Philadelphia area newspapers. Graduate of Temple University School of Communications with a major in journalism. Also an activist for many progressive causes in Philadelphia area.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

100 Anniversaries for 2013

Only Government Should Operate Prisons

Social Security-A Good Form of Social Insurance

AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Proportional represenation allows minority views to be heard

Inequality Apparently Increasing