Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 24 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 10/11/17

10 Reasons the US Should Stick With the Iran Nuclear Deal

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Message Medea Benjamin
Become a Fan
  (36 fans)

From Smirking Chimp

Image created from image crediting
Image created from image crediting
(Image by Medea Benjamin)
  Details   DMCA

President Trump is expected to announce this week that he will not recertify that Iran is complying with the 2015 nuclear deal. He will argue, falsely, that the agreement is no longer in the national interest of the United States.

The president's announcement will not end the deal but will pass the buck to Congress. In the next 60 days, Congress could impose new sanctions that would scuttle the deal or it could pass new legislation addressing issues that were never part of the original mandate, which would also effectively kill the agreement. Enough public pressure could keep the agreement intact.

Here are 10 good reasons why the US should uphold the deal.

1. President Trump's claim that Iran is not complying with the conditions of the deal is false. Iran is complying, as certified in eight reports over the past two years by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the entity charged of monitoring the deal. The Trump administration has not produced any evidence that Iran is not holding up its part of the bargain. Trump's concern about Iran's missile tests and its ties to militia groups are different issues; they're not part of this narrow, clearly defined nuclear deal.

2. The deal is actually a good one for the United States and the region because it does what it set out to do: keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons. It eliminates two-thirds of Iran's centrifuges and 98 percent of its enriched-uranium stockpile, and it is verified by the most intrusive verification and inspection regime ever negotiated. That's why even AIPAC, the powerful pro-Israel lobby group that sunk millions of dollars into trying to defeat the deal, is not calling on Trump to "decertify" Iran's compliance or withdraw from the agreement.

3. Scuttling the agreement would isolate the United States, not Iran. Of the six nations that signed the deal, only the United States is complaining. The other signatories are the four permanent members of the UN Security Council -- Britain, France, Russia and China -- plus Germany and the European Union. All are happy with the deal and intend to uphold it. A US pullout would leave the US out in the cold and collapse the consensus hashed out among our allies.

4. Nixing the Iran deal would send a disastrous signal to North Korea at this moment of crisis. If the US refuses to uphold a deal with Iran that it spent 20 months negotiating, why should North Korea even consider talks? A US exit from the Iran deal would signal to the North Korean leadership that there is only one path forward: speed up its nuclear and missile tests and its preparations for war. It would also alienate the Chinese, who not only want to preserve the Iran deal but are also essential to resolving the North Korean stand-off.

5. The US needs to work with Iran on ending the violence in the region, from Yemen to Syria. Trump's concerns about Iranian support for the "three Hs," Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis, will be exacerbated if the deal is undone, as Iran will have an even greater incentive to oppose US policies. If the deal holds, it will be pave the way for talks with Iran about all these other issues.

6. Without this deal, Iran would be free to rapidly reconstitute its nuclear program, installing more centrifuges and accumulating a larger stockpile of bomb-usable material. It would free Iran to produce as much enriched uranium or plutonium as it wants. If US officials are troubled by Iran's foreign policy now, imagine how much more powerful a nuclear-armed Iran would be. That is why Secretary of State Tillerson and National Security Adviser HR McMaster have argued against withdrawal.

7. De-certification would weaken global confidence in the United States and multilateralism. The deal was not only made between six nations, but the entire UN system. The UN Security Council approved the deal by a 15-0 vote. Putting the deal in jeopardy would compromise the entire international framework for non-violent conflict resolution and sink international respect for US leadership to a new low.

8. If the US pulls out and imposes more sanctions restricting business with Iran, those most affected would be US businesses. US firms are anxious to jump into this massive market of 80 million people. While Trump is busy whining about the "worst deal ever," the Chinese have just signed cooperation agreements with Iran on energy, transport, science, technology and national defense -- agreements worth up to $600 billion in the next 10 years. Europeans companies from Total to Citroen to Airbus have signed agreements as well. Meanwhile, US businesses will be left empty-handed.

9. Trump's bombastic talk about a "military option," with strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, could lead to a catastrophic war. Iran could immediately retaliate by attacking Israel and US troops stationed in Iraq, Afghanistan and on military bases throughout the Middle East. That's why Republican Senator and chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Bob Corker has warned that Trump's actions risk setting the nation "on the path to World War Three."

10. Upending the agreement will be a boon to Iran's conservative clerics, the very ones we DON'T want to embolden. President Rouhani will lose power to the hardliners, who were against negotiating with the West from the get-go. Their hand will be strengthened on the nuclear issue and other issues pertaining to Iran's foreign affairs, which would spell more chaos in the region. It could also lead to a backlash internally against the more secular, liberal forces in Iran.

Toying with a serious nuclear agreement to influence Iran in other areas is simply irresponsible and dangerous. That is precisely what defines President Trump: irrational and dangerous. Before he destroys the best global foreign policy achievement in the last decade, the world community -- from the UN to the US Congress to the public -- has to stop him.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Medea Benjamin Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Medea Benjamin is the cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK: Women for Peace and author of Kingdom of the Unjust: Behind the US-Saudi Connection. 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ten Reasons to Move Cheney's Book to the Crime Section

Tom Cotton is the Worst Bully in the Senate ---- Here Are 10 Reasons Why

Hillary Clinton and Saudi Arabia

The Egyptian General and the Gladiola

Dear Jon Stewart, Sane People Protest Crazy Wars

Julian Assange: Wikileaks Has the Goods on the Deaths of Innocent Iraqis Killed by the US

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend