by Ellen Theisen, Dave Klein and John Washburn
Sequoia has agreed to turn over source code and design documents for its electronic voting machine system to the District of Columbia Board of Elections for examination. The Board hopes to discover what caused the software to add 1500 write-in votes to the totals in last year's September primary. One of Sequoia's original suggestions was that it was static discharge or human error. But the DC Board of Elections didn't buy it. They pursued, investigated, and finally decided to go to court. Sequoia immediately caved. Could it be because Sequoia doesn't own the intellectual property rights)?...
National: Paper Presentation: Biomtric [sic] Voting system LINK AZ: Is Internet Voting Safe? Vote Here LINK CA: Elections Commission Looks at Instant Runoffs LINK DC: Firm to Give D.C. Information About Its Voting Devices LINK GA: Handel in hot water over voter screening LINK MS: Miss. voter ID supporter calls ruling victory LINK NJ: Mock election aims to fix voting machine flaws LINK OH: Trolling for chicks in Voter Vault LINK PA: 4 former ACORN workers will face trial in Pa. LINK SD: Election Night Results Rapid City City/School Election held on June 2, 2009 LINK India: Some technological issues with elections. LINK Netherlands: changing the ROMs of a Nedap e-voting computer in 60 seconds LINK Philippines: With Due Respect Neither fraud-proof nor error-free LINK
- Advertisement -
Published by VotersUnite.Org
Ellen Theisen, Director and Managing Editor
Dave Klein, Editor
John Washburn, Editor
Daily Voting News was founded on February 6, 2004 by John Gideon (1947-2009). To assist with Daily Voting News, please send links to news articles to dvn-tips. To donate, click here
"To encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy." The Creekside Declaration. March 22, 2008
**Articles and commentary included in "Daily Voting News" do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors of Daily Voting News, VotersUnite.Org, or OpEdNews.Com. Articles are selected for inclusion to inform subscribers' ability to draw their own conclusions based on noteworthy and credible news, research, legislation, and debate bearing on the integrity of elections.**
|The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.