Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

Texas Charter Schools: Don't Believe the Boasting and Hype; by Diane Ravitch

Quicklink Submitted By     (# of views)   1 comment, 7 series
Author 40790
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Susan Lee Schwartz
Become a Fan
  (23 fans)

Charters boast of their “success,” but the reality is far different from their claims. They don’t enroll similar demographics, their attrition rate is staggering, and their “wait lists” are unverified. Their claims are a marketing tool.They are not better than public schools.They undermine and disrupt communities without producing better results.Yet Texas is plunging headlong into this strategy that creates a dual system but benefits few students.William J. Gumbert has prepared statistical analyses of charter performance in Texas, based on state data. 

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At dianeravitch.net

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Susan Lee Schwartz Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I began teaching in 1963,; Ba and BS in Education -Brooklyn College. I have the equivalent of 2 additional Master's, mainly in Literacy Studies and Graphic Design. I was the only seventh grade teacher of English from 1990 -1999 at East Side (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Other Series: View All 48 Articles in "FAKE NEWS"

Other Series: View All 418 Articles in "PRIVITIZATION."

Other Series: View All 874 Articles in "Public ignorance & those who use this"

Other Series: View All 439 Articles in "wrecking Ball"

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


Susan Lee Schwartz

Become a Fan
Author 40790
(Member since Oct 25, 2009), 23 fans, 17 articles, 4064 quicklinks, 7445 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

"Without the approval of taxpayers and local communities:

State approved charters:

▪ Transfer the control and governance of public schools from local communities to privately-operated charters; ▪ Divert funding from community-based school districts to privately-operated charters. The State has already provided charters with over $22.5 billion of taxpayer funding;

▪ Increase the debt burden of taxpayers as charters are free to incur long-term bond debt without taxpayer approval;

▪ Increase the segregation of students attending public schools in certain communities; and ▪ Reduce the quality of schools in many community-based school districts as 20.4% of all charter campuses are rated as "low performing" (rated equivalent of "D" or "F") by the State's 2018 Academic Accountability Ratings. "She Compromise My Principle Yeah, Yeah": Every community has a fundamental responsibility to provide a quality public education that equally serves the unique needs of every student. As public servants, community-based school districts embrace this responsibility as all students are welcome and no student is turned away.


If there is not room, community-based school districts hire more teachers and make room. In comparison, the State's deliberate intervention in local communities allows privately-operated charters to:

▪ Serve a limited number of students and NOT enroll all students;

▪ Recruit the targeted students and families they desire to serve;

▪ Deny enrollment to students with "discipline histories";

▪ Serve a lower percentage of "students with disabilities";

▪ Serve a lower percentage of students "at risk" of dropping out; and

▪ Disrupt the education of over 12,800 "economically-disadvantaged" students due to charter closures in the last 5-years.


AND THEY SELL IT AS A "CHOICE" AND USE TAXPAYER MONEY to ruin public edcuation.

Submitted on Sunday, Sep 15, 2019 at 3:15:28 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Quicklink? Post Comment