Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 403 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Best Web OpEds   

Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine: to Remedy the Cancer that Enabled the Cancer of Trumpism

Quicklink Submitted By   2 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 39565
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Hugh Campbell
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

In 1969, The SCOTUS "ruled unanimously that the Fairness Doctrine was not only constitutional but essential to democracy. The public airwaves should not just express the opinions of those who can pay for airtime; they must allow the electorate to be informed about all sides of controversial issues."

Congress attempted to codify the Fairness Doctrine, with a House Yea-Nay Vote of 302 – 102 and a Senate Yea-Nay Vote of 59-31, but the legislation was vetoed by President Reagan.

The doctrine did not require equal time for opposing views but required that contrasting viewpoints be presented. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows, or editorials.

Reagan veto of Fairness in Broadcasting Act of 1987 counters a unanimous SCOTUS Ruling and the overwhelming will of the Congress.
The Father of Fake News
The Father of Fake News
(Image by The Christian Left)
  Details   DMCA
Read the rest of the story HERE:

At washingtonmonthly.com

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Hugh Campbell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

A seasoned financial professional, currently providing subject matter expertise on a variety of regulatory topics, including the Dodd-Frank Act, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and overall compliance monitoring. He has previously held (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: