Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

Rationale and Consequence of GOP's No-Fly List Gun Debate Position

Quicklink Submitted By   1 comment
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 39565
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Hugh Campbell
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

There are the reasons people, especially partisan politicians, give and the real reasons.

Watchlist has imperfections and possible violation Second Amendment rights were the reasons used by the Senate GOP. What list is perfect and shouldn’t the SCOTUS determine constitutionality rather than the Senate? A Real reason omitted is fighting terrorist is a top priority of the 1%, in order to protect their assets around the world, while gun violence is not a threat to their assets.  Pandering to the NRA, firearm company investors and dividing Americans politically, add to the undeclared reasons.

Copyrighted Image? DMCA

A consequence of the GOP’s No-fly List Gun Debate position is to enable the terrorist’s stated goal of dividing Americans, politically. Perhaps a top 2016 election issue should be, which of our two political parties is our terrorist enemies’ Most Valuable Party (MVP)!

Read the rest of the story HERE:



Rate It | View Ratings

Hugh Campbell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

A seasoned financial professional, currently providing subject matter expertise on a variety of regulatory topics, including the Dodd-Frank Act, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and overall compliance monitoring. He has previously held (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: