Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Best Web OpEds

Kavanaugh Lied Repeatedly Under Oath in 2004, 2006 and 2018

Quicklink Submitted By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message David William Pear     Permalink    (# of views)   7 comments

Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/2/18

Author 500873
Become a Fan
  (46 fans)

During his confirmation hearings in 2004, 2006, and 2018 Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was repeatedly asked about stolen documents and repeatedly denied knowing about them, despite evidence to the contrary, according to investigative reporter Lisa Graves.

From flickr.com: Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire! {MID-316690}
Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!
(Image by Ninian Reid)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At therealnews.com

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

David William Pear is a progressive columnist writing on U.S. foreign policy, economic and political issues, human rights and social issues. David is a Senior Contributing Editor of The Greanville Post (TGP) and a prior Senior Editor for (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

5 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments


David William Pear

Become a Fan
Author 500873

(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 45 fans, 67 articles, 292 quicklinks, 3106 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Sanders just today mentioned these purloined documents on MSNBC. This is hard evidence that Kavanaugh is a liar and a perjurer. Lying to Congress is a felony and an impeachable offence. This is not a small matter.

Submitted on Wednesday, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:26:53 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (5+)
Help
 
Indent

Em Sos

Become a Fan
Author 509442

(Member since Jul 23, 2017), 2 fans, 21 articles, 1 quicklinks, 197 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to David William Pear:   New Content

I had posted the comment below, about 3 hours ago, before you put this piece up. I'm hoping you'll see it as an affirmation of your piece; nothing more.

On my part it was a spur of the moment thing. I felt I had to post it and the article I posted it to was the most relevant at the time.

IMH'OEN'O

Switzerland demonstrated its partiality to neutrality during WW II and officially stayed out; not suffering the total devastation inflicted by warfare as on the rest of Europe.

For an individual human being to be impartial, the person has to be aware of the self, enough to recognize his/her own biases in order to make the conscious choices necessary, in contentious situations; to remain neutral - abstaining from inappropriate actions, or in decision making processes.

This ability is a prerequisite for anyone wishing to serve on the highest court in the land. For children and adolescents, sometimes there are mitigating ego circumstances for their assertions of infallibility.

Kavanaugh, the adult, has demonstrated numerous times, going back, looking only at his record as far back as the day he spoke to the press at the White House; during his public nomination, by Trump, to fill the vacant slot on the Supreme Court, that no matter the cost to the country as a whole, he is all about serving a minority of the powerful, as well as his own interests.

A brazen perjurer definitely does not have this capability to differentiate, if he does, his lying is premeditated and therefore, even more egregious.

On the other hand, as is patently apparent with the narcissistic personality disordered current sitting President, he lies incessantly, totally oblivious to the fact of his lying; being that he is afflicted with the symptoms of the aforementioned disorder, as described in the DSM V. If this diagnosis is not valid, then it is obvious that his con artist skills are second to none.

Trump too is showing his partiality, but in a negative trajectory, by bringing in all those intent on dismantling (privatizing) the country.

So, more of the same, in his selection of a character flawed individual, at this point in 'his' dismantlement administration, is no surprise!

Submitted on Wednesday, Oct 3, 2018 at 1:01:52 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (5+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

David William Pear

Become a Fan
Author 500873

(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 45 fans, 67 articles, 292 quicklinks, 3106 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Em Sos:   New Content

This story is not as titillating as the "she said, he said", and as important as that alleged attempted rape, battery and drunken behavior is, we have here concrete irrefutable evidence that Kavanaugh is a pathological liar and cheat.

To break it down simply, what Kavanaugh did was to receive the stolen 'exam questions' before the final exam. When caught he repeatedly denied that what he did was wrong, he minimizes and repeatedly lied as if to say "who are you going to believe, me or your 'lying eyes'?"

He lied about it at his confirmation hearings in 2004, 2006 and 2018. I agree with your analysis of his arrogance, immaturity and lack of character. In any position of power he is a danger to society. If he is confirmed, then impeachment, conviction, revoking of his license to practice law and he should face justice.

This should not be allowed to go away.

Submitted on Wednesday, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:06:59 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (5+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

shad williams

Become a Fan
Author 63282

(Member since Apr 13, 2011), 23 fans, 44 articles, 1 quicklinks, 2028 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Em Sos:   New Content

The presidency has evolved into an extremely perverted entity. The holder of that office can only walk about the oval office. The commander in chief is missing in action so the military has stepped in to keep the Great Hegemony alive.

I hold out hope that the project is not universally supported among the military.

In summary, it's not the unitary american president running the united states government, nor is it the feckless congress or corrupt court. In my opinion we must begin to look behind the curtain instead of gathering meaning from which way the curtain moves.

Submitted on Friday, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:30:43 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

David William Pear

Become a Fan
Author 500873

(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 45 fans, 67 articles, 292 quicklinks, 3106 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Also see quicklink from Slate: I Wrote Some of the Stolen Memos That Brett Kavanaugh Lied to the Senate About

Submitted on Wednesday, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:34:09 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 

Leslie Johnson

Become a Fan
Author 500983
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Dec 9, 2014), 17 fans, 12 articles, 1 quicklinks, 917 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

As a member of SCOTUS, he will have the opportunity to pass a lot more conservative issues and not overturning Citizens United. With Citizens United, corporations are flooding the coffers of legislators that will pass laws in their favor and we, the little people will continue to be asked to donate to the Democratic candidates. Our donations can in no way compete with that kind of money. It's a travesty regarding so-called (now practically defunct) Democracy. I want no more conservatives in the court..it would confirm the corporatocrisy and end the "for, of and by the people" government we are supposed to have.

Submitted on Wednesday, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:07:53 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 
Indent

kappie

Become a Fan
Author 48333

(Member since May 6, 2010), 2 fans, 533 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Leslie Johnson:   New Content

Unfortunately our moderate democrats depend heavily on corporate bribes also,its just the corporations trust the republicans more to do their bidding and give 10 times as much to republicans as democrats except in years where it is apparent that the people are once again fed up with Republicans.true Democrats are a little less outward in their support of corporations but like the republicans they supported global free trade,tax cuts for the rich,raising the social security age and obama even appointed a social scurity committee made up mostly of haters who wanted to cut social security.Democrats refused to prosecute the big banks when they tried to bankrupct the country after Republicans and moderate Democrats had rules passed to gut the Glass segall bank regulation act.Democrats also went along with Republcians to give control of the media to Republicans by letting rich billionaires consolidate ownership under them.unfortunately both parties believe in the corportarisy.the only real difference is on many social issues.I to miss our former Democracy which we haven't had since the 70's

Submitted on Thursday, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:08:52 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Quicklink? Post Comment