Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments

Jim Lehrer Debate Moderating Performance Savaged

Quicklink submitted By       Message Amanda Lang     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 5
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
Replace Insecure //a0.twimg.com/profile_images/2678549545/0d408fd9c4dc55fd1ec200b07a282a90_normal.jpeg "I'm not going to say I've done a poor job..." That was Jim Lehrer's assessment of his performance as the moderator of the first presidential debate of the 2012 election. Sadly for him, many disagreed. It was Lehrer's 12th time moderating, but he was largely unsuccessful in his attempts to corral the candidates. Both President Obama and Mitt Romney rolled right over him as, with increasing plaintiveness, he tried to get them to stop talking. "No, no, no," he said to Romney at one point. Romney didn't listen. By the end of the debate, Obama and Romney had taken so much free time that Lehrer had to inform them that they would not get to one of the 15-minute segments he had intended to moderate. The reviews on Twitter were scathing. Conservative columnist John Podhoretz called Lehrer possibly "the worst moderator in the history of moderation." Even the normally mild-mannered Al Roker...

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At www.huffingtonpost.com

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -