1) From http://www.indymedia.ie/article/101116?&condense_comments=false#comment286818:
Hitler style "global rape" getting closer and closer for humanity as a whole?
by W. Finnerty Tue Jan 03, 2012 09:37
"Former CIA officer and historian Phil Giraldi warns in a Dec. 29 (2011) column for antiwar.com that Obama goes further than Bush and Cheney, and like Bush-Cheney, Obama has destroyed the U.S. Constitution in a way that parallels what Hitler and Carl Schmitt did against the Weimar Constitution."
"But for Giraldi, the parallel is Weimar. Like Weimar after the Reichstag Fire, the U.S. has destroyed the Constitution and replaced it with a 'lawless Fuehrer state,' like that provided for Hitler by Carl Schmitt and other leading jurists. Giving a brief summary of some of the crisis powers given to Hitler after the Reichstag Fire, which 'was almost certainly carried out by the Nazis themselves,' Giraldi emphasizes the importance of the 'Enabling Act, which gave [Hitler] the authority to ignore parliament and pass laws by decree.'
The above excerpts are from the following location:
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/21035
==============================
2) From http://www.indymedia.ie/article/101116?&condense_comments=false#comment286823:
The Rape of Justice
by W. Finnerty Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:32
Opus,
Re: Your comment at Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:03
I would fully agree with you that verbal trickery (of a great many different kinds and forms) plays a major role in the way the bulk of the people are being "led up the garden path" (as I see things) for the past several years now, with regard to a wide range of matters which are crucially important for humanity as a whole: such as government bank-bailouts to pay off the "derivatives" gambling debts of the unbelievably arrogant bankers, and the present warmongering activities taking place in connection with the Middle East situation (for example).
That said though, I do believe that the meaning of the word "rape" (these days) can legitimately include -- and can be applied to -- serious forms of violations and abuse of more or less any kind: as in "The Rape of Justice" for example; and which is what I very strongly suspect is happening in the case of Marian Price: assuming she is still being held in jail in the manner, and for the reasons, described recently by Eamonn McCann (Journalist).
Related Link: http://www.indymedia.ie/article/101092?&condense_comments=false#comment286643
==============================
3) From http://www.indymedia.ie/article/101060?&condense_comments=false#comment286512:
Legal Profession Inconsistencies
by W. Finnerty Sun Dec 18, 2011 18:00
I am interested in this case for a number of reasons.
One of my reasons relates to the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms referred to in connection with former Police Sergeant James Gill.
I take it this must mean C-PTSD: i.e. Complex-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, of the kind which builds up over a period of time.
Although I have a "To Whom It May Concern Letter" dated October 28th 2005 from my GP (at that time), I have never -- try as I might -- been able to get any legal representation whatsoever regarding the C-PTSD issues in question.
A scanned copy of the October 28th 2005 "To Whom It May Concern Letter" letter referred to above can be viewed at the following location: http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com/DrMcCavert28October2005/Letter.htm
The many, many efforts I have made since October 28th 2005 to find the legal representation I still very badly need, include the registered letter I sent to Barrister John Glynn (Hogan & Co, Ballinasloe) on April 3rd 2007. A copy of the text of the letter in question (together with a scanned copy of Post Office receipt) can be viewed at: http://europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com/JohnGlynn3April2007/EmailLetter.htm
To date, I have not received any reply, not even an acknowledgement of receipt, from John Glynn (Barrister) to the registered letter referred to at the www address immediately above. As this case with former Sergeant James Gill very clearly shows though, the legal profession (and the medical profession) have no difficulty at all in raising Post Traumatic Stress Disorder issues in court when the victim is (or was at the time) on the Government payroll.
However, when the perpetrators of C-PTSD causing abuses are "public officials and bodies", and even when there is very clear and straightforward written medical evidence to substantiate the claim, as in my particular case, the whole situation is treated by the legal profession in an entirely different manner altogether: thanks, as I see things at least, to nothing other than pure (and totally disgusting) legal profession corruption of the kind which very vigorously supports government crime.
Related Link: http://www.humanrightsireland.com/BarristerJohnGlynn/30June2010/Meeting.htm
==============================
Human Rights Ireland: http://www.humanrightsireland.com
==============================
