Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Diary    H2'ed 11/23/21

Homer's Favorite Hero: Or, Are Dichotomies Important?

Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.

Capture of Helen of Troy
Capture of Helen of Troy
(Image by History Maps)
  Details   DMCA

Does Homer prefer one of his chosen protagonists, Achilles or Odysseus, over the other? Or is it the Iliad's quintessential antihero Thersites, the lone commoner among the Greek troops who dares to speak his mind up against Agamemnon? His ugly features and single tear running down them are as poignantly described as the death of more prestigious fighters, with anatomical damages so graphically portrayed. The latter include tangents leading back to idyllic home scenes and beloved family who will mourn this tragic loss of youth in its prime and hopefulness. All these are replaced by heroic feats that elevate the victims, though most locally rather than featured in other famous epic narratives.

Thersites's suffering occupies just a few lines, while those of the other uncelebrated victims spread over lavish flashbacks.

Homer loves these victims, even Thersites, whose name encompasses bravery rather than his inferior caste status. What was he doing there anyway? To anticipate the more democratic age that will follow in Athens? Hard to say. But Thersites is honored with a beating by none other than Odysseus, one of the two heroes Homer favors with celebratory epics, the other being Achilles himself, of course.

As to name significance, Homer's favorites' names both imply pain: Achilles being cognate with "ache" and Odysseus's name indirectly entered our language as its opposite: "anodyne," the "odyne" meaning "pain."

Both are givers and receivers of pain, though Homer associates this with Odysseus's name, using the figura etymologica "odyssao" and others more often than "achos" suggesting Achilles' name.

A word for pain occurs close to the beginning of both epics: "algea," suffering, in the Iliad, and the same word in line 4 of the Odyssey. But Odysseus receives the pain while the wrath of Achilles inflicts it, in these opening lines anyway. Odysseus's pain refers to his twenty years of wandering after the ten-year war while, in the Iliad it refers to the tenth (and last) year of the war, when Agamemnon originates Achilles' wrath by ordering that he give up his beloved concubine/slave Briseis.

But why is it important to ask which hero Homer favors? It is to ask, perhaps, if the immortal bard preferred happy to tragic endings to life. Odysseus will reach home and ta empeda panta (everything that is his) while Achilles will celebrate his beloved Patroclos with funeral games and then grant literature a scene more poignant than Odysseus's reunion with Penelope: Achilles' compassionate reception of his arch foe's bereaved parent Priam. The Odyssey also ends with a meeting up with an old decrepid man, his father Laertes, but the old man has more reason to rejoice with his son's homecoming that Priam does with the return of Hector's corpsethat the gods kept unblemished despite Achilles' vicious attempts to defile it.

Ultimately Odysseus wins a triumph regaled in literary history while Achilles gifts it with a less renowned but tragically stunning moment in counterpoint to the hideous violence against Hector; Odysseus's reunion with Penelope also succeeds hideous violence, and so we have two juxtapositions of violence with its inverse, in counterpoint, perhaps, to the Trojan War's origins with love leading to violence, but that irony is strictly tangential to my theme, except that Agamemnon's "abduction" of Briseis catalyzes a war within a larger war also catalyzed by abduction of a love object.

Homer favors suffering over love scenes, though the latter weave in and out of his opus delightfully, celebrated in the recurrent formula "mingled in sweet love." The formulae characterizing battle scenes are far vaster in number!

Odysseus suffers more than twenty years, even with homesickness in the delightful arms of the witches Circe and Calypso, which affairs consume eight years of his travels. Circe sends him to hell while Calypso sends him to pompe (return home)-land, Phaeacia.

Achilles suffers first over Briseis, with suffering compounded exponentially by Patroclos's death, and this anticipates his own prophesied demise, so that Homer juxtaposes moribundity--to violence--with the "peaceful death out of the sea, in old age" that is prophesied for Odysseus.

Ultimately, the dichotomy I'm drawing between happy and sad endings in Homer may be beside the point if not false. Odysseus is rewarded while Achilles suffers incalculable loss. Deservingness doesn't enter in. But to argue that both fates are predetermined is beside the point. Homer could do what he wanted with the content and the tradition, in my opinion.

Both heroes inflict incalculable violence and pain on their victims but, I argue, Achilles loves better, whether it's Briseis or Patroclos, but both losses trigger their inverse and, as to who's more violent, I'd say the equation is equal. Achilles' own violence lies dormant throughout much of the Iliad, as does Odysseus's throughout much of the Odyssey, but when the wrath meets its objects, close your eyes and cringe if not vomit. Homer, as I've noted, doesn't spare us the details.

Or, to put it slightly differently, Achilles' love is more poignant. What triggers Odysseus's wrath is the violation of his empeda panta (everything that is his), not just his wife, while Achilles' wrath focuses on the loss of two love objects.

The genres within epic differ: a war account versus a nostos, a song of return. So the larger question may be, which genre does Homer prefer? If it's relevant. But more to the point, which turns out to be who loves better, why dwell on that? Is it machismo versus tenderness, boiling down to male versus female values? Which has gone on to rule our culture? "Violence is the sire of all the world's values," opines the poet Vachel Lindsay. And I maintain that he is correct.

And that may cast in irony the fact I've dredged up that Achilles is portrayed as the better lover. In Homer, violence takes up far more space than love, but his love scenes stand out eternally in literature. I have argued that the Iliad is the greatest antiwar poem ever created. It deals with violence so graphic as to induce vomiting. So it's ironic that subsequent civilization chose violence, machismo, over love. The Aphrodite versus Ares theme pervades literature and life but Ares prevails, and so our civilizations, all of them, are doomed.*

I venture to say that Aphrodite's victory might have saved us, all of us, whatever culture we partake of, even though the dichotomy implies reciprocity. We should have let Love conquer All, Virgil's immortal claim.

But alas, he was wrong.

_______________________________

**In the Odyssey, in book 8 (Phaeacia), the bard Demodocus spins a tale of both these gods being trapped in bed together, cheating on Aphrodite's husband, Hephaistus, who created the trap. Both war and love get their heads banged together in this pivotal burlesque, I believe.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Marta Steele Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Marta Steele is an author/editor/blogger who has been writing for Opednews.com since 2006. She is also author of the 2012 book "Grassroots, Geeks, Pros, and Pols: The Election Integrity Movement's Nonstop Battle to Win Back the People's Vote, (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Comments Image Post Diary Comment and Rate This Diary

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters.
Become a Premium Member Would you like to be able to enter longer comments? You can enter 10,000 characters with Leader Membership. Simply sign up for your Premium Membership and you can say much more. Plus you'll be able to do a lot more, too.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password
Show Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

No comments  Post Comment

 
Want to post your own comment on this Diary? Post Comment