Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Diary (Diaries are not moderated)

George Galloway's Refusal to Debate Israelis Is Not Racist

By       Message      Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

Must Read 1   Funny 1   View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Being anti-Zionist does not mean being anti-Semitic.

::::::::

George Galloway is being called a racist for walking out of a debate at Oxford University when he discovered that his opponent was Israeli.

This is a dishonest, easy way of ignoring what Galloway is actually saying. After walking out, he made this statement:

"I refused this evening at Oxford University to debate with an Israeli, a supporter of the apartheid state of Israel. The reason is simple: no recognition, no normalisation. Just boycott, divestment and sanctions, until the apartheid state is defeated. I never debate with Israelis nor speak to their media. If they want to speak about Palestine -- the address is the PLO."

I have been called an anti-Semite for criticizing Israel. Like Galloway's, my objection is not to Jewish people - it is to murder and land-grabbing.

I would not debate anyone who identified with Israel if doing so could be construed as my recognizing Israel as a nation rather than the terrorist state I consider it to be. I would not travel to Israel. That is not racism - it is objection to policy. I am anti-Zionist, anti-racist, not anti-Semitic.

 

- Advertisement -
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags