Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Diary    H2'ed 7/13/19

All About The Political Capital and Favor of the President

Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Lance Ciepiela
Become a Fan
  (52 fans)

It seems to be all about the 'political capital and favor' of the president
It seems to be all about the 'political capital and favor' of the president
(Image by breibart.com)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Obviously, Pelosi prefers "investigating" rather than "impeaching" Trump - for W Bush, however, she did not even bother to "investigate" him. For Pelosi, it seems to be all about the "political capital and favor" of the president.

Apparently, an endearing "compliment" coming her way from the president "will go a long way" to please Pelosi - a friendly "smile" at her from the president, a warm, tender, genuine, "handshake" coming to her from the president and Pelosi seems to become nearly "oblivious" (e.g., to thirty-five Bush Articles of Impeachment - 'IraqWar "Fraudulent Justification" - Article II', completely "ignored" by Pelosi, potentially forever more endangering the American people and the nation's justice system from the "whims" and "deeds" of a president gone "amok") to "the rule of law" (that "no one is above the law" - e.g., #NurembergCrimes) when it comes to "impeaching the president" ("Well, she could stop me" - admits House Judiciary Chairman Rep John Conyers to Rob Kall) - #TemperTantrum #SenseOfDuty.

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Lance Ciepiela Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Lance Ciepiela is a retired senior who had an interesting career in government service - a United States Marine Corps (USMC) Vietnam-Era veteran, who became interested in restoring the Constitution after I realized that W Bush had attacked (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Comments Image Post Diary Comment and Rate This Diary

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   



You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.
Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

3 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments  Post Comment


Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 4, 2008), 52 fans, 58 articles, 97 quicklinks, 4292 comments, 214 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

#FedRateHikes - "eight interest rate hikes" so far" for Trump from the fed - "a delayed reaction" of up to six months or more for a negative impact (a fed caused "boom or bust") on the economy (whenever the fed's fund rate hits 2.75 or more) which could cause "a recession" or "stock market crash" for Trump in 2019/2020, in effect, "impeaching the president" for Trump's 2020 reelection bid.

Submitted on Saturday, Jul 13, 2019 at 5:03:35 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Glers

Become a Fan
Author 506681

(Member since Sep 12, 2016), 16 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

in 06' after a blue tidal wave hit Congress Nancy Pelosi declared " Impeachment is off the table" and that was the last day I was a Democrat! All smoke and no fire is all you get from her!

Submitted on Sunday, Jul 14, 2019 at 8:35:08 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 
Indent

Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 4, 2008), 52 fans, 58 articles, 97 quicklinks, 4292 comments, 214 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Glers:   New Content

Yes, usually, Pelosi quickly qualifies her statements "not" to impeach Republican presidents (your "Impeachment is off the table") by adding something like "but, if anyone knows of a crime", when asked by the media about impeaching W Bush shortly after Rep Dennis Kucinich had filed his Articles of Impeachment, and for Trump, she already qualified "he's just not worth it". Yes, she does give "lip service" only to the "rule of law" (i.e., "no one is above the law") but, so true, there is "no fire" (on "her second time around" as House Speaker, with super Democrat Majorities on her both times around to "impeach the president" requires "a simple majority vote" in the House - Trump's Ten Impeachable Offenses) as you say, for the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to be sure.

Submitted on Sunday, Jul 14, 2019 at 11:06:58 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jan 22, 2008), 37 fans, 70 articles, 420 quicklinks, 5523 comments, 48 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Pelosi has her position of Speaker of the House because she has raised the most money from the likes of MIC, Big PhRMA, the oil industry, the insurance industry, Wall Street, et. al., and that is why the people, average taxpayer, receives absolutely no positive actions from Pelosi.

Bush needed to be impeached for all of the war crimes his administration committed, but the MIC gave Pelosi orders to keep hands off, so she did as her boss ordered.

That is the reason there will be no Medicare for all as she has already told the insurance industry CEOs not to worry.

She strongly opposes the Progressives in the party because her sugar daddies who are unable to bribe them pose a threat to them.

This is not to say Pelosi is the only politician selling themselves to these pimps, but she is in the position to safe guard others do not upset the gravy train.

Submitted on Sunday, Jul 14, 2019 at 9:08:08 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 4, 2008), 52 fans, 58 articles, 97 quicklinks, 4292 comments, 214 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Dennis Kaiser:   New Content

Probably, if asked, most Americans would say the House of Representatives belongs "to the people" of the United States - surely, when Articles of Impeachment "are on file", or "ready to file", in the "Peoples' House", the House Speaker should be "speaking up" of course. By not "speaking up" (giving her OK for "impeachment hearings"), Pelosi seems to be "thoroughly befuddled" as to who actually "owns the House" that she's been "visiting" for nearly her entire lifetime in congress.

Submitted on Monday, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:08:08 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jan 22, 2008), 37 fans, 70 articles, 420 quicklinks, 5523 comments, 48 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Lance Ciepiela:   New Content

To Pelosi those padding her pockets not those voting her in control the House.


Being she does not value the votes people of San Francisco should not waste their vote in 2020.

Submitted on Monday, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:50:31 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndent

Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 4, 2008), 52 fans, 58 articles, 97 quicklinks, 4292 comments, 214 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Dennis Kaiser:   New Content

For Pelosi, it seems like it's not about her campaign coffers ("Victory Fund") - she's loaded with cash and her constituents back in San Francisco dearly love her and "rubber stamp" her back to congress every chance they get.

'As I've always said impeachment is off the table' Mr President even all thirty-five Articles that I have pending for follow up and action
'As I've always said impeachment is off the table' Mr President even all thirty-five Articles that I have pending for follow up and action
(Image by simbio.com)
Details DMCA

Pelosi does seem "to glow" when the president gazes at her and gently reaches out to her as if she "has his back" and he "knows it".

Submitted on Monday, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:13:12 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 4, 2008), 52 fans, 58 articles, 97 quicklinks, 4292 comments, 214 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

#NeverAgain - it's already "on the books" in the 21st Century.

Iraq was not any 'imminent threat' to the United States but W Bush falsely
Iraq was not any 'imminent threat' to the United States but W Bush falsely 'made it so' destroying the sovereign nation having nothing to do with the 9/11 'explosive' demolitions at the World Trade Center
(Image by Common Dreams)
Details DMCA

W Bush attacks Iraq on 'false pretenses' - a nation that never attacked the United States, nor was "planning to attack", nor was "an imminent threat"to the United States - the "Crime of Aggression" repeats (Hitler attacks Poland - WWII /W Bush attacks Iraq - #EndlessWars).

Submitted on Monday, Jul 15, 2019 at 6:52:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Diary? Post Comment