Subject: Clinton, though a Democrat, IS a neocon. She is a 110% zion

Comment:

See Original Content on OpEdNews in article titled "The problem's that Clinton IS qualified for president: Is Bernie's 'Political Revolution' the Real Thing or a Sad Joke?"

Clinton, though a Democrat, IS a neocon. She is a 110% zionist, supporting the worst policies of the Netanyahu government without question. She advocates threatening Russia with destabilization of its government and US offensive weapons on its western borders, and continued support of the fascist regime in Ukraine which was established after a coup plotted and supported by her State Department. She advocates US war in Syria, even if it means confronting the Russians who are legally backing the existing government of Bashar al assad. She advocates a "muscular" US military with bases around the globe, and a position of global dominance as advocated in the Neocon bible, the Project for a New American Century. Where have you been?


In terms of global survival, there is little or no difference between Hillary and Cruz, and in fact, Trump, who at least recognizes that Russia is a country the US should not get into a war with, and in fact should be a country that is America's friend, could be the safer and saner choice, at least on international affairs.

But I disagree about your estimation of Bernie Sanders' prospects in independent race. Especially if Trump decides on running as an independent, Bernie, as the most popular candidate of the whole lot, including Clinton, would have a great chance of winning at least a plurality, especially if he was given a Green Party nomination so he would be on the ballot in most states.

It's time to take a deep breath and make a move to blow up the corrupt, fossilized two-party Duopoly of Replicrats. And Bernie can do it.

Dave Lindorff
founding editor of ThisCantBeHappening.net

Close Window