Back   OpEd News
Font
PageWidth
Original Content at
https://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_daniel_g_061213_hold_your_hat_21__here.htm
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

December 13, 2006

Hold your hat! Here we go again... two morons, one sore loser lead the way.

By Daniel Geery

::::::::

A recent Common Dreams article, from The Plain Dealer, regarding Dennis Kucinich's announcement that he is going to run again for president, reads in part as follows: [Start passage] Stephen Hess, a George Washington University public affairs professor who has written several books on the presidency, said Kucinich's second bid will give his ideas wider exposure but will do little to improve his chances of winning. Hess says Kucinich lacks the charisma of Obama, the political connections of Clinton or the résumé of other candidates considering a run. "What he has got is a name that's hard to pronounce and an ideology that's pretty far to the margins of his party," Hess said. Washington, D.C., political handicapper Stuart Rothenberg agrees, adding that Kucinich won't be able to raise as much money as other contenders and that "he has painted himself into representing a tiny corner of the Democratic Party." "After a while, Congressman Kucinich's Don Quixote-like struggle starts to appear kind of goofy," Rothenberg said. "Everyone deserves a shot to run for president, but I am not sure everyone deserves two shots," he said. In an interview with Plain Dealer editors and reporters a month before the election, Kucinich said he had "no plans" for a second bid, though he refused to rule it out completely. Republican Mike Dovilla, who was crushed by Kucinich in the Nov. 7 election, complained bitterly Monday that Kucinich misled voters. "It's too bad that during this year's congressional campaign, Dennis Kucinich did not have the decency to be honest with the people of Ohio's 10th District," he said in a statement. "For two more years, we will have an absentee congressman as Dennis runs around the nation to indulge his insatiable ego and advance his personal, extremist agenda in another futile run for the White House." [End passage] It is easy enough to forgive the sore loser in this instance, Mike Dovilla, for his peevish attitude. Many children never receive the help they need to get past this stage of development. About all we can do for Mike is wish him luck if he decides to run again. But I found myself asking, who is this Stuart Rothenberg guy? Why is he holding himself up as a prophet? Why would anyone give a fart in the wind what Stuart Rothenberg has to say about Dennis Kucinich, particularly when there is not one iota of fact to support his unpleasant opinion? And for that matter, just what is a "political handicapper"? Dictionary.com says there are no entries for the phrase "political handicapper." However, a few clicks of the mouse did bring me to "The Rothenberg Political Report," published by none other than Stuart Rothenberg-that same Mr. Rothenberg, who proclaims: 1) Kucinich has painted himself into representing a tiny corner of the Democratic Party; 2) Kucinich's Don Quixote-like struggle appears kind of goofy; and 3) everyone deserves a shot to run for president, but he is not sure everyone deserves two shots. Check Stuart's website for yourself, and you'll learn that he offers "free political news and analysis," which, if you so desire, you can have delivered to your inbox. Reading further, you will learn that, "The Rothenberg Political Report is an independent newsletter that reports on U.S. House and Senate contests... It neither endorses candidates nor advocates positions on matters of public policy." Thus we learn that reporters for the The Plains Dealer, and who knows how many other hodunk papers, turn to this "political handicapper" for his opinion, two years in advance regarding presidential candidates-in this case, a "political handicapper" who puts out a paper that does not endorse candidates. Evidently, it just slaps them around a few times, if Stuart doesn't like them. Then I wonder, "Ok, why does this particular handicapper not like Dennis Kucinich?" A few more mouse clicks and I learn that Stuart has done on-the-air analysis for Voice of America, the "official international radio and television broadcasting service of the United States federal government," according to Wikipedia. The Center for Media and Democracy gives us a little more information about the Voice of America: "What's happened at the VOA -- which the longtime Karl Rove ally Tomlinson oversees as chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) -- has done considerable damage to the value and credibility of international broadcasting.... VOA administrators have pressed the agency's journalists to report pro-White House spin and too often directed them to downplay hard-hitting news in favor of puffery." Like Sean Hannity, Stuart went to a Catholic college, the Catholic University of America. He has done op-eds for The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post, among other newspapers that are good for insulation and for wiping your ass in a pinch. But need I say more? Moving along, I wonder about this Stephen Hess fellow, who The Plain Dealer tells us is "a George Washington University public affairs professor who has written several books on the presidency," and who is evidently another prophet, since he proclaims, "Kucinich's second bid will give his ideas wider exposure but will do little to improve his chances of winning," because, says Hess, "Kucinich lacks the charisma of Obama, the political connections of Clinton or the résumé of other candidates considering a run." Furthermore, "What he has got is a name that's hard to pronounce and an ideology that's pretty far to the margins of his party." Well, thank you Stephen! And just who the hell are you? According to the Brookings Institution website, Stephen was the "Editor-in-Chief of Republican Party Platform (1976)." He is a Brookings Institute Scholar, a Senior Fellow Emeritus of Governance Studies. Of course, I'd heard of the Brookings Institute before, and somehow associated it with alleged conservative viewpoints, but I never actually looked into it. Till just now. According to SourceWatch: "Initially centrist, the Institution took its first step rightwards during the depression, in response to the New Deal. In the 1960s, it was linked to the conservative wing of the Democratic party, backing Keynsian economics. From the mid-70s it cemented a close relationship with the Republican party. Since the 1990s it has taken steps further towards the right in parallel with the increasing influence of right-wing think tanks such as the Heritage Foundation." So there you have it. Our lively source of information, The Plain Dealer, has gone out of its way to bring us two conservative right wingding viewpoints, with no opposing opinion, and not so much as a mention of their own Congressman's highly informative website. I thus present an opposing opinion, that of Cindy Sheehan, who recently had breakfast with Dennis and traveled around with him a bit: [N]ot too many people know that Dennis is an inspired orator, and each time I hear him speak, I feel like searching for the nearest baptismal font or river to be baptized for something, anything." (And I guess I'll add my own opinion, namely that that's about how I felt when I heard Dennis speak at the Salt Lake City Airport, and also when I read his book, "A Prayer for America.") As noted earlier, the article quoting Hess and Rothenberg in the Plains Dealer appeared on the Common Dreams website, the same website that gave short shrift to Dennis two years ago, and the same website that gave free rein to Molly Ivins and Arianna Huffington, when they made prophecies for Dennis not unlike those of Hess and Rothenberg. As a general rule, I'm not one for prophecies, but I don't mind self-fulfilling prophecies when they are of a positive sort. For example, when a child tells me, "I am going to work really hard today," or, when my doctor says, "Looks like you're doing very well. Keep up those good habits and you'll have good health for a long, long time." Or when I tell myself while working on an invention, "I can see that this concept is correct; I just need to work out the details to make it happen." But when a child tells me, "I can't do this. I'll never get it," then quits for good, or when someone tells me, "This candidate will never win"-BECAUSE they and a few others say so, and therefore give up before they START TO CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY, it is clear to me that their attitude is not PART of the problem; it IS the problem. In this sense, many so-called progressives are no different from the evangelicals who are doing their damndest to bring about "the final days." In fact, they are worse because they ought to know better and have enough backbone to stand up for their beliefs and at least TRY to make them become reality. "I'd rather vote for the candidate I like and lose, than vote for the candidate I don't like and win," said Eugene Debs.* And indeed, if WE can't create our own social conditions, just who on this little planet is going to do the job for us? My background in education compels me to extend my sermon one bit further, even though I hate sermons. I would point out, for George Washington University Professors and any others who have trouble with phonics, that if you'll just think of what Popeye eats, then say it with a "Ku" instead of an "sp," you'll sound considerably more intelligent when speaking of this particular presidential candidate, and have no trouble pronouncing his name. Last but not least, it is my prophecy that both these items will be very good for you, and the rest of the world as well. *I think that's who said it, but I can't find the quote for certain.

Authors Website: http://www.hyperblimp.com

Authors Bio:

In my run for U.S. Senate against Utah's Orrin Hatch, I posted many progressive ideas and principles that I internalized over the years. I'm leaving that site up indefinitely, since it describes what I believe most members of our species truly want: www.voteutah.us. I thank those who sent such wonderful comments, even though it forced me to go buy a few larger hats, which were among my top campaign expenses (just kidding).

My forever-to-write novel (now my favorite book for some unfathomable reason), A Summer with Freeman, finally got out the door, via Kindle and CreateSpace. Readers of this site, and anyone else with two or more brain cells who want some "serious humorous relief" may want to check it out: http://www.opednews.com/articles/A-Summer-with-Freeman-nov-by-Daniel-Geery-130528-385.html

My family and I lived off the grid in an earth-sheltered, solar powered underground house for 15 years, starting in the early '80s, proving, at least to myself, the feasibility of solar power. Such a feat would be much infinitely easier with off-the-shelf materials available now, though the bureaucracy holding us back is probably worse. http://www.opednews.com/articles/Living-on-Sunshine-Underg-by-Daniel-Geery-110318-547.html

I wrote a book on earth-sheltered solar greenhouses that has many good ideas, but should be condensed from 400 down to 50 pages, with new info from living off the grid. It's on my "to do" list, but you can find used copies kicking around online. Just don't get the one I see for $250, being hawked by some capitalist... well, some capitalist.

I'm 68 with what is now a 26 year old heart--literally, as it was transplanted in 2005 (a virus, they think). This is why I strongly encourage you and everyone else to be an organ donor--and get a heart transplant if you're over 50, unless your name is Dick Cheney.

I may be the only tenured teacher you'll meet who got fired with a perfect teaching record. I spent seven years in court fighting that, only to find out that little guys always lose (http://www.opednews.com/articles/Letter-to-NEA-Leadership--by-Daniel-Geery-101027-833.html; recommended reading if you happen to be a parent, teacher, or concerned citizen).

I managed to get another teaching job, working in a multi-cultural elementary school for ten years (we had well over 20 native tongues when I left, proving to me that we don't need war to get along--no one even got killed there!). http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_daniel_g_060716_alternatives_to_exti.htm

I spent a few thousand hours working on upward-gliding airships, after reading The Deltoid Pumpkin Seed by John McPhee. But I did my modelling in the water, so it took only two years and 5,000 models to get a shape that worked. You can Google "aquaglider" to learn more about these. As far as I know, this invention represents the first alteration of Archimedes'principle, spelled out 2,500 years ago.

"Airside," the water toys evolved into more of a cigar shape, as this was easier to engineer. Also, solar panels now come as thin as half a manila folder, making it possible for airships to be solar powered. You can see one of the four I made in action by Googling "hyperblimp"(along with many related, advanced versions).

Along with others, I was honored to receive a Charles Lindbergh Foundation Award, to use my airships to study right whales off Argentina. Now we just have to make it happen and are long overdue, for reasons that would probably not fit on the internet.

In 2010 I married a beautiful woman who is an excellent writer and editor, in addition to being a gourmet cook, gardener, kind, gentle, warm, funny, spiritual, and extremely loving. We met via "Plenty-of-Fish" and a number of seemingly cosmic connections. Christine wrote Heart Full of Hope, which many readers have raved about, as you may note on Amazon.

I get blitzed reading the news damn near every day, and wonder why I do it, especially when it's the same old shit recycled, just more of it. In spite of Barbara Ehrenreich and reality, I'm a sucker for positive thinking and have read many books on it. I find many many of them insane and the source of much negativity on my part. My favorites these days are by Alan Cohen, who seems to speak my language, and likewise thinks a bit like Albert Einstein did (as do I on this note). Albert: "Try and penetrate with our limited means the secrets of nature and you will find that, behind all the discernible laws and connections, there remains something subtle, intangible and inexplicable. Veneration for this force beyond anything that we can comprehend is my religion. To that extent, in fact, I am religious."

Though I rapidly note that I've kept alive my deceased and "devout atheist" friend's book, http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Foundation-of-Religion-by-Daniel-Geery-110510-382.html

Lastly, kudos to Rob Kall and those who make OEN the site that it is: one of the last bastions of free speech.


Back