OpEdNews
Post a Comment
Original Content at
http://www.opednews.com/articles/A-Modest-Proposal-to-Creat-by-Rob-Kall-Corporate-Welfare_Exploitation_Pollution_Wall-Street-Parasites-140531-713.html
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Associate Member, or higher).

May 31, 2014

A Modest Proposal to Create a Business for Corporate Parasite Bounty Hunters and Whistle Blowers

By Rob Kall

We know that corporations often make profits because they parasitize the commons-- stealing assets, like clear water, clear air, uncompensated or treated worker injuries, use of educated workers or use of roads that far exceeds the average human's use. If those corporations paid for those abuses-- paid to the commons-- then we might not have the budget problems we have and we might have less problems with the environment

::::::::

From flickr.com/photos/21733269@N06/13735406113/: Polluters' Gain, Citizens' Pain

We know that corporations often make profits because they parasitize the commons-- stealing assets, like clear water, clear air, uncompensated or treated worker injuries, use of educated workers or use of roads that far exceeds the average human's use.

If those corporations paid for those abuses-- paid to the commons-- then we might not have the budget problems we have and we might have a lot less problems with the environment or workers or other ways that corporate parasitization exploits our commons.

Corporations might even find that some of their business was no longer profitable, or they'd come up with ways that did not expose them to the costs of compensating the commons.

So here's my proposal. Make it a viable business to find and report cases of corporate parasitization of the commons. Set a law that makes it illegal to parasitize the commons. Don't provide specifics, like adding X amount of toxic sludge to a creek. Simply make it a law that there is zero tolerance for any exploitation of the commons. And then, offer bounty hunters rewards for exposing parasitization abuses. Of course this will include whistleblowers-- people who are inside the corporations who have an opportunity to see wrong. The rewards for exposing corporate parasites should be large enough so a person can blow the whistle without worrying about losing his or her job.

Of course, corporations will fight every charge at first, with an army of lawyers. But, if the laws are well written, without gaping loopholes, it should be possible to make legitimate accusations hold.

I envision a business where environmentalists, using the law, can not only stop companies from polluting, but also fund their organizations' activities for years to come. Whistleblowers will be able to stop execs from exploiting the commons. Ideally, the law will make it a crime to knowingly continue to exploit the commons once it has been made clear, by various means, that the action or policy is indeed commons exploitation.

My guess is that companies and individuals in the US exploit the commons to the tune of at least a trillion dollars a year, probably more. Some will be wealthy and some will simply be lazy or just not care that they are dumping poison into the environment, or poaching electricity, or simply littering.

If bounty hunters and whistleblowers report just ten percent of the abuses each year, the government will get $100 billion or more, and I propose that the bounty hunters get 10% of the fine.

Of course, once the abuse is identified, the corporations will have to pay fines annually until they come up with alternative approaches. That will bring in additional revenues to local, state and federal governments. I'd love to see this applied to fracking. And I'd like to see extra fines and jail terms for companies and executives that lie about what they are doing.

I can imagine some of the more red, conservative states refusing to participate. But the law should include federal penalties as well, with states and localities sharing in the benefits if they share in the policing and prosecution of corporate parasites in their areas.

I imagine that companies and the US Chamber of Commerce will howl bloody murder, saying that this will cost jobs. On the contrary, it will create jobs for bounty hunters, lawyers, inspectors, people who follow up to see if compliance orders are being met. And if some companies go out of business, so be it. We have too many corporate parasites and the world will be better off either curing them of their parasitic behaviors or ending them by putting them out of business.

As with most legislation, this would probably be set to apply at first, and with tougher rules, for bigger corporations, say with more than 50 or 100 employees. But ultimately, even company and individual should be accountable for what they take from the commons.



Submitters Bio:

Rob Kall is editor-in-chief, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor. He hosts the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, aired in the Metro Philly area on AM 1360, WNJC. Over 200 podcasts are archived for downloading here, or can be accessed from iTunes. Rob is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Rob Kall Wikipedia Page

Rob is, with Opednews.com the first media winner of the Pillar Award for supporting Whistleblowers and the first amendment.

See more Rob Kall articles here and, older ones, here. To learn more about Rob and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article. For Rob's work in non-political realms mostly before 2000, see his C.V..  and here's an article on the Storycon Summit Meeting he founded and organized for eight years. Press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

Here is a one hour radio interview where Rob was a guest- on Envision This, and here is the transcript. 

To watch Rob having a lively conversation with John Conyers, then Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click hereWatch Rob speaking on Bottom up economics at the Occupy G8 Economic Summit, here.

Follow Rob on Twitter & Facebook. His quotes are here

My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Back