Haiti is one of the most shameful episodes in US foreign policy.When it became the first independent black republic in this hemisphere, Jefferson(ironically,author of our Declaration of Independence)refused to recognize it.& for some time now,strangling Haiti economically,& ruining its rice crop for the benefit of US exporters.If we weren't spending on stupid wars,we could have made them less vulnerable to natural disasters.
Howard Zinn is a historian, author, social activist, and American icon. His book A People's History of the United States
has sold over two million copies. Welcome back to OpEdNews, Howard. The
dust has had a chance to settle a bit since last month's airing of your
documentary "The People Speak." What kind of feedback have you gotten
We've received lots of nice messages on "The People Speak." The
History Channel tells us that eight million people have seen part or
all of the film, and two million on the first night it was shown
(apparently they have no way of telling if a viewer cuts out on the
program). It will be on the History Channel again February 22nd and
That's impressive and must be gratifying for all of you involved
in the project. There's still another half hour of new material in the
DVD that is being released next month, correct? What haven't we seen
Yes, Joan, the History Channel program is 90 minutes, the DVD two
hours. A bunch of readings we had no room for in the TV version: Marisa
Tomei reading a Lowell mill girl of the 1830s, Benjamin Bratt reading
an ex-slave responding to his master who wants him back, Danny Glover
reading a black state legislator in Georgia responding to his
expulsion from the legislature, Kerry Washington reading Fannie Lou
Hamer, Marisa reading Cindy Sheehan, Sean Penn reading Kevin Tillman
(brother of football star Pat Tillman killed in Afghanistan). And
more, including the singer Pink with her song, "Dear Mr. President."
I read that there was a huge amount, something like 97 hours, of
raw footage. So much wonderful material ended up on the cutting room
floor. How ever did you decide what went in?
A big question. We wanted the most dramatic readings, and the ones most relevant to what is happening today.
I'm sure that generated some lively discussions. In the film,
you touched on the difference between the Declaration of Independence
and the Constitution, penned only a few years later. I'd like to know
more. Why was there a shift in the attitude of the framers of the
No change of attitude. One was a manifesto, rhetoric to rally people. The other a legal document, expressing their real desires.
This small but important difference seemed to signify something
larger. The Declaration's original phrasing "life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness" was tweaked, becoming "life, liberty and
property" in the Constitution, neatly encapsulating the tension between
democratic and aristocratic principles. That tension continues to this
day. We may not have landed gentry and inherited titles on these shores
but we do have Big Business, which consistently rides roughshod over
the interests of the rest of society. On that note, would you
like to comment on the Supreme Court's decision last week to strike
down corporate campaign finance limits?
Liberals get excited about things like that as if they signal a
dramatic change. No, the corporations ran our elections before the
decision and will do so now -- just with a fig leaf of "legality." The
designation of corporations as "persons" which started in 1886 is just
proof of how our legal system, the Constitution, the courts have always
been tools of the wealthy classes.
The more things change, the more they stay the same. You lived
through WWII. Although you were fighting overseas, your family and
everyone else were part of the American war effort. They had ration
cards, did metal drives, planted Victory Gardens. There was a real
feeling that we were all in this together. What we have now is
something else entirely. It started when Pres. Bush told everyone to
help the fight against terrorism by going shopping. Something vital has
been lost. Can you comment on that?
Of course, both soldiers and civilians at that time had either a
strong (mine) or a vague (my fellow crew members) sense of a just war.
Yes, it was much different from now. But as you probably know, in
retrospect, our view was simplistic - (you know my talk THREE HOLY WARS and my view of WWII expressed in my writings?)
[Note: I wasn't familiar with "Three Holy Wars" so I just went and read it. I recommend it to our readers, who can also watch the video of this 2009 speech. In it, Zinn says that we can't even give what we consider "just wars" (the Revolutionary War, Civil War, and WWII) a
pass. That there is a distinction between just causes and just wars. We
need to be willing to ask hard questions like: was there another way,
other than war, to achieve that goal? What was actually achieved? And, at what cost? As time passes, it becomes harder and harder to do that. Trust Howard to give us a fresh way to look at old, accepted ideas. Now, back to the interview...]
On the international front, Haiti recently suffered a devastating
earthquake. At this point, we still don't know how many people died as
rescue and medical efforts continue. Americans have a notoriously short
attention span and aren't generally interested in other nations'
history. If we were to look beyond the corruption of Duvalier father
and son, we would see that America had a hand in making Haiti what it
is today, wouldn't we?
Haiti is one of the most shameful episodes in U.S. foreign
policy because Haiti is a neighbor (as is Cuba, where a similar
relationship has persisted) and we have treated Haiti with cruelty all
through our history. When it became the first independent black
Republic in this hemisphere, defeating the Napoleonic army, the
administration of Thomas Jefferson (ironically, author of our
Declaration of Independence) refused to recognize it.
And in the early 20th century, repeated Marine excursions to put
down rebellions, and in 1916, the supposed "idealist" and proclaimer of
"self-determination" Woodrow Wilson sent an occupation army, killing
several thousand Haitians who would not accept our rule. The occupation
lasted eighteen years.
And since then, as you note, support of the
Duvalier dictatorship. And hostility to Aristide the first
democratically elected president. And for some time now, strangling
Haiti economically, and ruining its rice crop for the benefit of U.S.
exporters. If we weren't spending hundreds of billions on stupid wars,
we could have made much of Port-Au-Prince less vulnerable to natural
Interesting last point, Howard. I guess the question to ponder
is, even if there were no wars, would Haiti be a priority for the US?
Sadly, I see no evidence pointing in that direction. Thank you for
talking with me again, Howard. It's been a pleasure.
Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of transparency and the ability to accurately check and authenticate the vote cast, these systems can alter election results and therefore are simply antithetical to democratic principles and functioning.
Since the pivotal 2004 Presidential election, Joan has come to see the connection between a broken election system, a dysfunctional, corporate media and a total lack of campaign finance reform. This has led her to enlarge the parameters of her writing to include interviews with whistle-blowers and articulate others who give a view quite different from that presented by the mainstream media. She also turns the spotlight on activists and ordinary folks who are striving to make a difference, to clean up and improve their corner of the world. By focusing on these intrepid individuals, she gives hope and inspiration to those who might otherwise be turned off and alienated. She also interviews people in the arts in all their variations - authors, journalists, filmmakers, actors, playwrights, and artists. Why? The bottom line: without art and inspiration, we lose one of the best parts of ourselves. And we're all in this together. If Joan can keep even one of her fellow citizens going another day, she considers her job well done.
When Joan hit one million page views, OEN Managing Editor, Meryl Ann Butler interviewed her, turning interviewer briefly into interviewee. Read the interview here.
While the news is often quite depressing, Joan nevertheless strives to maintain her mantra: "Grab life now in an exuberant embrace!"
Joan has been Election Integrity Editor for OpEdNews since December, 2005. Her articles also appear at Huffington Post, RepublicMedia.TV and Scoop.co.nz.