Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites [STATISTICS]


Sen. Dianne Feinstein's New NSA Bill Will Codify and Extend Mass Surveillance of Americans

By (about the author)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and one of the NSA's biggest defenders, released what she calls an NSA "reform" bill today.

Don't be fooled: the bill codifies some of the NSA's worst practices, would be a huge setback for everyone's privacy, and it would permanently entrench the NSA's collection of every phone record held by U.S. telecoms. We urge members of Congress to oppose it.

We learned for the first time in June that the NSA secretly twisted and re-interpreted Section 215 of the Patriot Act six years ago to allow them to vacuum up every phone record in America--continuing an unconstitutional program that began in 2001. The new leaks about this mass surveillance program four months ago have led to a sea change in how Americans view privacy, and poll after poll has shown the public wants it to stop.

But instead of listening to her constituents, Sen. Feinstein put forth a bill designed to allow the NSA to monitor their calls. Sen. Feinstein wants the NSA to continue to collect the metadata of every phone call in the United States--that's who you call, who calls you, the time and length of the conversation, and under the government's interpretation, potentially your location--and store it for five years. This is not an NSA reform bill, it's an NSA entrenchment bill.

Other parts of the bill claim to bring a modicum of transparency to small parts of the NSA, but requiring some modest reporting requirements, like how many times NSA searches this database and audit trails for who does the searching.

But its real goal seems to be to just paint a veneer of transparency over still deeply secret programs. It does nothing to stop NSA from weakening entire encryption systems, it does nothing to stop them from hacking into the communications links of Google and Yahoo's data centers, and it does nothing to reform the PRISM Internet surveillance program.

Ironically, a bill that claims to bring transparency to the NSA was debated, discussed and modified by the Intelligence Committee today in secret.

The bill does make minor improvements in other areas, by explicitly allowing the FISA court to accept amicus briefs in certain circumstances (though it has already done so with existing authority), and authorizing a report to Congress will summarize significant FISA court opinions. Summarize, but not release.

Make no mistake: this is not an NSA reform bill at all. Instead of codifies one of the NSA's most controversial surveillance programs. We urge you to call your Senator to oppose Sen. Feinstein's disingenuous bill.

Reprinted from

Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and lawyer who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He has contributed to  The (more...)


Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's New NSA Bill Will Codify and Extend Mass Surveillance of Americans

Guilty Plea In Fox News Leak Case Shows Why Espionage Act Prosecutions Are Inherently Unfair to Sources

DOJ Investigation of AP Part of Larger Pattern to Intimidate Sources and Reporters

Tell A Friend


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Have Articles V and VI of that quaint old U.S. Con... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:26:03 PM
By the way, were the Framers really so clueless th... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:37:21 PM
The alleged reason for all the beefed up military ... by Stefan Thiesen on Saturday, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:42:07 AM
Apparently OpEd News cannot show the EURO sign... ... by Stefan Thiesen on Saturday, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:44:28 AM
Feinstein is a good example of the need to get the... by Dennis Kaiser on Friday, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:55:06 PM
  Maybe if Sen. Feinstein paid a day or three... by Howard Lewis on Friday, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:39:24 PM
The setup for totalitarianism is in place. ... by Hosea McAdoo on Saturday, Nov 2, 2013 at 6:15:46 AM
That woman needs to find a new job preferably in a... by Archie on Saturday, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:08:05 PM by Teddi Curtis on Saturday, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:53:48 PM


Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum