Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
31 comments

  Society-Culture

Should secular people actively oppose religious superstition and extremism?

By Don Smith ()     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags    Add to My Group

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 9/24/11
Become a Fan
  (19 fans)

opednews.com

Poll

Should secular people actively oppose religious superstition and extremism?

     Freedom of religion and tolerance for diversity are fundamental principles of American democracy. Believers have the Constitutionally-guaranteed rights to follow and proselytize their religious convictions.  

On the other hand, non-believers have the similar rights to follow and promote their secular beliefs, don't they?  Freedom of religion and tolerance should not be used as justification for stifling honest, open discussion. 

Religious extremism and superstition distort our politics and harm society.   On issues such as militarism, women's rights, gay rights, gun control, taxation, climate change, and the dismantling of the social safety net, fundamentalist Christians have allied themselves with the Republican Party.  Fundamentalists have promoted anti-scientific theories such as Creationism and have spread the idea that America was founded as a "Christian nation" -- a view at odds with the historical record.

But is religious belief specially protected?  Even if, constitutionally, secular people are allowed to oppose religious beliefs, it may be the case that doing so is immoral or divisive or strategically unwise.  And we need to be careful not to lump extremist views with harmless or beneficial moderate views.



Prayer by Don Smith from Art Explosion Clipart


Should secular people work actively to refute and, where appropriate, condemn religious beliefs? 

Yes, fundamentalists believe ridiculous things and promote regressive policies.
No, religious speech is specially protected.
No, the effort would likely backfire and would be politically and morally unwise.
Not sure, or other. (Please explain in comments.)

        90 votes    View Results and Comments



            Invite Your Friend(s) to Vote: Tell A Friend         View All Polls

 

Share This Poll

You can publish this poll on your blog or website. To embed a poll, just copy the code from this "Embed" box. Once you've copied the code, just paste it into your website or blog to embed it.

Embed: Customize
<script language="JavaScript" src="http://www.opednews.com/populum/poll_api.php?pid=578&layout=default"></script>
DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (more...)
 
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles