Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 68 (68 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   38 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 4 of 18 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Further evidence that the calls were faked is provided by timing problems in some of them. According to the 9/11 Commission, Flight 93 crashed at 10:03 as a result of the passenger revolt, which began at 9:57. However, according to Lyzbeth Glick's account of the aforementioned cell phone call from her husband, Jeremy Glick, she told him about the collapse of the South Tower, and that did not occur until 9:59, two minutes after the alleged revolt had started. After that, she reported, their conversation continued for several more minutes before he told her that the passengers were taking a vote about whether to attack. According to Lyzbeth Glick's account, therefore, the revolt was only beginning by 10:03, when the plane (according to the official account) was crashing.45

A timing problem also occurred in the aforementioned call from flight attendant Amy Sweeney. While she was describing the hijackers, according to the FBI's account of her call, they stormed and took control of the cockpit.46 However, although the hijacking of Flight 11 "began at 8:14 or shortly thereafter," the 9/11 Commission said, Sweeney's call did not go through until 8:25.47 Her alleged call, in other words, described the hijacking as beginning over 11 minutes after it, according to the official timeline, had been successfully carried out.

Multiple lines of evidence, therefore, imply that the cell phone calls were faked. This fact has vast implications, because it implies that all the reported calls from the planes, including those from onboard phones, were faked. Why? Because if the planes had really been taken over in surprise hijackings, no one would have been ready to make fake cell phone calls.

Moreover, the FBI, besides implying, most clearly in the case of Deena Burnett, that the phone calls reporting the hijackings had been faked, comes right out and says, in its report about calls from Flight 77, that no calls from Barbara Olson occurred. It does mention her. But besides attributing only one call to her, not two, the FBI report refers to it as an "unconnected call," which (of course) lasted "0 seconds."48 In 2006, in other words, the FBI, which is part of the Department of Justice, implied that the story told by the DOJ's former solicitor general was untrue. Although not mentioned by the press, this was an astounding development.

This FBI report leaves only two possible explanations for Ted Olson's story: Either he made it up or else he, like Deena Burnett and several others, was duped. In either case, the story about Barbara Olson's calls, with their reports of hijackers taking over Flight 77, was based on deception.

The opening section of The 9/11 Commission Report is entitled "Inside the Four Flights." The information contained in this section is based almost entirely on the reported phone calls. But if the reported calls were faked, we have no idea what happened inside these planes. Insofar as the idea that the planes were taken over by hijackers who looked "Middle Eastern," even "Islamic," has been based on the reported calls, this idea is groundless.


4. Was the Presence of Hijackers Proved by a Radio Transmission "from American 11"?

It might be objected, in reply, that this is not true, because we know that American Flight 11, at least, was hijacked, thanks to a radio transmission in which the voice of one of its hijackers is heard. According to the 9/11 Commission, the air traffic controller for this flight heard a radio transmission at 8:25 AM in which someone---widely assumed to be Mohamed Atta---told the passengers: "We have some planes. Just stay quiet, and you'll be okay. We are returning to the airport." After quoting this transmission, the Commission wrote: "The controller told us that he then knew it was a hijacking."49 Was this transmission not indeed proof that Flight 11 had been hijacked?

It might provide such proof if we knew that, as the Commission claimed, the "transmission came from American 11."50 But we do not. According to the FAA's "Summary of Air Traffic Hijack Events," published September 17, 2001, the transmission was "from an unknown origin."51 Bill Peacock, the FAA's air traffic director, said: "We didn't know where the transmission came from."52 The Commission's claim that it came from American 11 was merely an inference. The transmission could have come from the same room from which the calls to Deena Burnett originated.

Therefore, the alleged radio transmission from Flight 11, like the alleged phone calls from the planes, provides no evidence that the planes were taken over by al-Qaeda hijackers.

5. Did Passports and a Headband Provide Evidence that al-Qaeda Operatives Were on the Flights?

However, the government's case for al-Qaeda hijackers on also rested in part on claims that passports and a headband belonging to al-Qaeda operatives were found at the crash sites. But these claims are patently absurd.

A week after the attacks, the FBI reported that a search of the streets after the destruction of the World Trade Center had discovered the passport of one of the Flight 11 hijackers, Satam al-Suqami.53 But this claim did not pass the giggle test. "[T]he idea that [this] passport had escaped from that inferno unsinged," wrote one British reporter, "would [test] the credulity of the staunchest supporter of the FBI's crackdown on terrorism."54

By 2004, when the 9/11 Commission was discussing the alleged discovery of this passport, the story had been modified to say that "a passer-by picked it up and gave it to a NYPD detective shortly before the World Trade Center towers collapsed."55 So, rather than needing to survive the collapse of the North Tower, the passport merely needed to escape from the plane's cabin, avoid being destroyed or even singed by the instantaneous jet-fuel fire, and then escape from the building so that it could fall to the ground! Equally absurd is the claim that the passport of Ziad Jarrah, the alleged pilot of Flight 93, was found at this plane's crash site in Pennsylvania.56 This passport was reportedly found on the ground even though there was virtually nothing at the site to indicate that an airliner had crashed there. The reason for this absence of wreckage, we were told, was that the plane had been headed downward at 580 miles per hour and, when it hit the spongy Pennsylvania soil, buried itself deep in the ground. New York Times journalist Jere Longman, surely repeating what he had been told by authorities, wrote: "The fuselage accordioned on itself more than thirty feet into the porous, backfilled ground. It was as if a marble had been dropped into water."57 So, we are to believe, just before the plane buried itself in the earth, Jarrah's passport escaped from the cockpit and landed on the ground. Did Jarrah, going 580 miles per hour, have the window open?58 Also found on the ground, according to the government's evidence presented to the Moussaoui trial, was a red headband.59 This was considered evidence that al-Qaeda hijackers were on Flight 93 because they were, according to some of the phone calls, wearing red headbands. But besides being absurd for the same reason as was the claim about Jarrah's passport, this claim about the headband was problematic for another reason. Former CIA agent Milt Bearden, who helped train the Mujahideen fighters in Afghanistan, has pointed out that it would have been very unlikely that members of al-Qaeda would have worn such headbands:

[The red headband] is a uniquely Shi'a Muslim adornment. It is something that dates back to the formation of the Shi'a sect. . . . [I]t represents the preparation of he who wears this red headband to sacrifice his life, to murder himself for the cause. Sunnis are by and large most of the people following Osama bin Laden [and they] do not do this.60

We learned shortly after the invasion of Iraq that some people in the US government did not know the difference between Shi'a and Sunni Muslims. Did such people decide that the hijackers would be described as wearing red headbands?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18

 

David Ray Griffin is professor emeritus at Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University, where he taught philosophy of religion and theology, with special emphases on the problem of evil and the relations between science and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
27 people are discussing this page, with 38 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Comment from Ratings:   David Ray Griffi... by N Soren on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:54:19 AM
Comment from Ratings:   Dr. Griffin has ... by Carol Cleveland on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:46:55 PM
Comment from Ratings:   Superb! Really ... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:44:09 PM
at the NIST report of the building 7 collapse, if ... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:49:17 PM
Comment from Ratings:   Griffin has real... by Tod Fletcher on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:38:34 PM
Do I believe the hijackers were muslim? Probably. ... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:58:20 PM
Comment from Ratings:   David Ray Griffi... by Kevin Barrett on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:17:18 PM
Welcome to Op Ed News!Please post more! ... by George Washington on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:59:02 PM
This complements and extends the fine work of Elia... by Keith Mothersson on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:13:33 PM
If these 19 guys didn't board the planes, wher... by Mad Jayhawk on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:42:27 PM
that you didn't actually read the article. I pres... by Oh on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:38:34 AM
Comment from Ratings:   One of the reaso... by Bob F on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:55:00 PM
On the contrary, the tower collapses only require ... by Maxwell on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:29:09 PM
...it is very good to see you posting on Op Ed New... by scott creighton on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:39:16 PM
Bob F, I think you might be interested in this sho... by gravity32 on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:35:46 AM
That is one of the best presentations I have ever ... by Maxwell on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:48:01 PM
Thank you for this well-researched and objective l... by Ron R. on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:17:57 AM
Comment from Ratings:   Incredibly detai... by Jaswant Krishnayya on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:54:48 AM
Comment from Ratings:   David Ray Griffi... by Gary Via on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:29:28 AM
Comment from Ratings:   BREAKING NEWS! 9... by Amanda Lang on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:33:56 PM
See here and here and here.... by Sheila Samples on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:54:52 PM
 The Dutch connection , Rudi Dekkers and Huff... by Nemo on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:32:20 PM
Excellent masterpiece of scientific argumentation ... by aberamsay on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:16:17 PM
for this wonderfully clear piece of truth.... by Bob Smith on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:53:39 PM
Comment from Ratings:   This is a very, ... by joel kauffman on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:37:40 PM
.... and treats 9/11 like it's a religion, because... by Alan Williams on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:15:05 AM
Joel Kaufman an Alan Williams,Where is your top gu... by aberamsay on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 3:14:47 AM
"Shame and sh*t ..."Ramsheyi, are using ... by Tom Murphy on Sunday, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:13:46 PM
The only tool available to those of us who wish to... by jeff prager on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 9:16:56 AM
Jeff Prager,Gangsters in power don't give a da... by aberamsay on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:55:14 PM
On the contrary my friend. Should I print what I r... by jeff prager on Tuesday, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:33:19 AM
Silverstein, the leassor of the WTC buildings was ... by Mel Smith on Sunday, Sep 14, 2008 at 2:06:08 AM
PNAC, modern day version of The Protocols, is a Zi... by aberamsay on Sunday, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:29:12 AM
I too believe 911 was an inside job, and will cont... by ronheri on Sunday, Sep 14, 2008 at 2:17:05 PM
By what possible logic do you conclude that the 9/... by Alan Williams on Sunday, Sep 14, 2008 at 9:04:43 PM
Alan Williams,We don't need a whistleblower to... by aberamsay on Monday, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:06:25 AM
Translation:  I have no meaningful evidence, ... by Alan Williams on Tuesday, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:36:41 AM
Comment from Ratings:   There are millio... by ronheri on Sunday, Sep 14, 2008 at 2:20:01 PM