Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
3 comments, In Series: Rob Kall Interview Transcripts

General News

Transcript: Glen Ford on Groundhogs Day, Susan Rice, Gaza, Obama, and the Silence of the Progressives

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 8 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 12/2/12
Become a Fan
  (281 fans)

opednews.com

Rob : (laughs) You know it doesn't go down easy, and Romney didn't go down easy, but Obama goes down smooth when you're taking in all that Republican policy, war, and bank caretaking, and what have you.

Glen : You know, beyond war and austerity, we just came across an item from Free Press that says that Obama's FCC (you know the Federal Communications Commission, is dominated by whatever president gets to put the majority on there), that the Obama FCC is now going to resurrect the same consolidating measures that George Bush's FCC tried to push through in 2003, allowing cross ownership of newspapers and broadcast media in the top twenty markets; the whole shebang that sparked a kind of movement against consolidation that swayed the US Senate.  If you remember, back in 2003, when it was the evil Bush and his evil FCC that was pushing for further consolidation of media.  Well, according to Free Press, those same measures are now on the agenda for Barack Obama's FCC, and they're being just as stealthy about it as the Bush FCC was.  And, I have a prediction:  We won't have that kind of groundswell of resistance, because it's Obama's FCC.

Rob : And that's the big problem.  We need to get that resistance going.  I did a poll on OpEd News, which is left of Democrat, asking what people expected from a Lame Duck Obama if he was elected to a second term, and something like 85% of them thought he would move further to the right.  What do you think?

Glen :  They're absolutely correct, and it's not that Obama is just some kind of weather vane that moves whichever [way] the wind blows.  Obama really is philosophically a center-right corporate politician, and we've been saying that ever since before he was elected.  And you know, in the first couple of months of his regime, even the New York Times described him as center-right, and this at a time when Democrats controlled both houses of Congress, when the punditry were reading obituaries over the corpse of the Republican Party, just as some of them are doing now, when there were virtually no effective pressures coming from the Right, when Social Security was still untouchable -- George Bush in his second term having tried his assault on Social Security and having suffered his worst domestic defeat of his two terms.  So Obama could have done just about whatever in the hell he wanted to do, and we saw what he did.  He introduced austerity as the dominant and current subject of conversation when the Republicans were in no shape to push for it.  He was calling for so-called entitlement reform in two meetings with the editorial boards of the Washington Post and the New York Times in the weeks before he even took the Oath of Office. And he immediately proceeds toward establishing his hand-picked deficit reduction commission, thereby mandating that austerity would be the reigning conversation.  He did all that by himself [with] no Republican pressure betraying his own core philosophy.  Remember that in early 2008, as the subprime mortgage crisis started being felt outside of the black and brown ghettos and barrios, it was Barack Obama who opposed even a voluntary moratorium, much less a mandatory moratorium on foreclosures, when Hilary Clinton was backing a voluntary moratorium, whatever the hell that is, and Edwards was calling for a mandatory moratorium.  So, he revealed himself as the banker's friend, as one who would block any efforts to reign in the power and privileges of the banks, back in that time, before he was even elected.

Rob :  Alright, so let me take a step back, because the question I asked you two questions ago was in terms of activism and things that you're doing, or that you're working on, or seeing even, that will bring about change. 

Glen :  Well, despite the bad prognosis (and it is poor) for any rejuvenation of a broad Progressive movement in the United States any time soon, that does not lessen the fact that Capitalism is in deep, profound, and I believe terminal, crisis.  That deterioration of the system, and you know I'm sixty three now, I never hoped -- even back in the day when I was in the Panther Party -- I really never believed that I would live to see -- actually, when I was in the Panther Party, I didn't think I would live to many years at all (laughs)-- but I never believed that I would live to see the actual fall of US imperialism as the dominant power in the world, but I think that it just may happen in my lifetime.  So deep are the contradictions, so frequent are the crises, so short the time between crises in this system.

Rob : Now you're talking about Imperialism and Capitalism exchanging the words.  Are they the same?

Glen : No, I'm not.  I said US Imperialism. (laughs)

Rob :  At first you said Capitalism is in deep crisis.

Glen :  Well Capitalism is in deep crisis, but I'm not predicting the end of Capitalism in my life.  But US Imperialism, as the military structure that exists today, guarding the powers that be, the Lords of Capital who are in charge today, that is on its last legs, although it's going to be a very bloody end, and there is no guarantee that all of us will survive that demise either.

Rob : And what is the threat to US Imperialism?  What is eroding it, or conquering it, or causing it to be in crisis?

Glen : Because with the triumph of finance capital, as with many things in history, it's very difficult to set a date, even a year, when that was accomplished, but I think it was pretty definitive by the 1970s, we now have the rule of a class that creates nothing, that only survives by manipulating markets, a class that actually inhibits the productive growth of the world, so they can't compete.  And we see these rising regional powers, specifically the Brick Nations.  You know, Brazil's International Development Agency is bigger than the IMF, and that's just Brazil.  And so we see these basically Capitalist powers, but not headquartered in London and New York and Paris, we see them overtaking and certainly out-competing the United States and Western Europe.  And increasingly, the only weapon that they have is the weapon -- all they have is their guns- in Africa, for example.  The United States doesn't even pretend that it's in a trade war with China and Brazil and India.  It's basically abdicated that, after all, Wall Street -- finance capital - is not engaged in trade.  It's engaged in manipulation of currencies, and directing US militaries to use other means to block the peaceful growth of trade among nations.  So in Africa, we see the US basically abandoning much of the economic sphere to these rising regional powers that I've just mentioned, but at the same time strengthening AFRICOMs penetration of African militaries as well as the actual US presence of militaries in Africa.  And I think that that's the way we're going to see this play out in general in the world over the coming years.  I'm not even going to project in times of decades, because the decline is so rapid.  And this means that we're going constantly to have military kinds of crises that scare the hell out of us, but the general picture of US shrinking Soft Power will increase in pace.

Rob :  "The shrinking of American Soft Power."  Now, you know, last year I interviewed Joseph Nye who wrote the book on Soft Power.  He's now editor of the Trilateral Commission.  I don't think I'd have gotten him as a guest once he was Trilateral Commission editor.  So, you see US Soft Power shrinking eh?  Because it seems to me that it is.  And that is why?

Glen :  Yeah, yeah.  Well, because it's economic power is shrinking, and that ultimately is the Soft Power.  Even in terms of what the United States is trying to project as its moral authority, and that is its military intervention cloak on Imperialism - even though it's not a member of the International Criminal Court, the ICC actually is its creature - even that kind of what they would purport as Soft Power, is actually just a front for US military power.  So we see that, ultimately, all this moralizing and humanitarian talk that masquerades as Soft Power and persuasion has to be backed up by the power of NATO, as with the murderous assault on Libya.

Rob :  Let's get back to Capitalism.  Now you say "Capitalism is in crisis."  Let's talk about that.  How is Capitalism in crisis?

Glen :  Well, we can see that the lords of capital, Wall Street, the alternative economy that they have created, actually has an existence disconnected from the real economy.  And we can see that most starkly in the very existence of derivatives, whose notional value -- and it's difficult to measure, because they come into being, and then they go out of existence, and pop up elsewhere -- but the notional value of derivatives is usually set around six hundred trillion dollars.  The world gross planetary product is only ninety trillion dollars.  So we have this alternative economy that only the biggest finance Capitalists can play in, which is seven, eight, nine times as large as the actual economy of the world.  It hangs over us like a "Sword of Damocles."  It certainly cannot be leveraging six hundred trillion dollars of notional values on a world economy that is only a very small fraction of that.  And it inevitably is going to collapse.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and website architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), and publisher of Storycon.org, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Listen to over 200 of Rob's Podcast interviews here.

Rob is, with Opednews.com the first media winner of the Pillar Award for supporting Whistleblowers and the first amendment.


With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom-up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey and Positive Psychology. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. Watch me speaking on Bottom up economics at the Occupy G8 Economic Summit, here.

See more Rob Kall articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about Rob and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article. For Rob's work in non-political realms mostly before 2000, see his C.V..

And here's a one hour radio interview where I was a guest- on Envision This, on 10/23/13. And here is the transcript. 

And Rob's quotes are here.

To watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, former Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video.

Rob's radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also hosted a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table


Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Libertarian Legacy? Ron Paul's Campaign Manager, 49, Dies Uninsured, Of Pneumonia, Leaving family $400,000 Debt

Interview: McCain Fellow Hanoi Hilton POW & Naval Academy Dorm-mate; Why He Won't Vote For McCain

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Kudos to you and to Glen Ford !Henri... by mhenriday on Sunday, Dec 2, 2012 at 2:29:21 PM
I agreed with most of it.  I'm not as anti-Ob... by Sheila Samples on Sunday, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:25:17 PM
The notational value shouldn't be compared to m... by Jerry Scott on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:12:58 PM