Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Immoral Inanity of Intelligent Design Creationism

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -

So according to ChristoID it was the Holy Trinity that had to have designed humans with a reproductive system that is outrageously defective that most conceptions fail to make it through the 9 months. Up to half of conceptions are so genetically messed up that they fail to even implant -- that is a primary reason why most unprotected sex between viable couples fails to result in an observed pregnancy when the female is fertile. After implantation genetic defects and developmental problems cause a large fraction to spontaneously abort. Other assorted errors in the reproductive machinery that Christian intelligent designers believe the God sloppily crafted cause assorted pregnancy failures up to stillbirths. Even some who are successfully born are afflicted by birth defects -- a fact that atheoastronomer Neil DeGrasse Tyson cites as evidence against the creator theory.  

After birth matters get even worse. Most preborn that die do so so early that they were not even aware of their existence, so at least no suffering has been involved in their cases. After birth the great kid killer is disease. The reason that children die like flies from an array of microkillers is because they lack effective immune systems. So, according to ChristoID, lethal microbes had to be deliberately cleverly crafted to kill humans by the perfect creator that has such limitless love for the innocent children that the designer did not equip with the robust protective complexes the tykes need to defend themselves against the deadly germs that their creator created. And microbes do not kill gently. Billions and billions of little ones have been brutally tortured to death by God -- according to the monotheist wing of ID.

The biggest kid killer has been malaria that on its own may have liquidated maybe 20+ billion children. Behe concurs that ID theory demands dropping responsibility for disease right into the lap of the creator -- "Here's something to ponder long and hard. Malaria was intentionally designed. The molecular machinery with which the parasite invades red blood cells is an exquisitely purposeful arrangement of parts. [A mother's] children died in her arms partly because an intelligent agent deliberately made malaria" (The Edge of Evolution).

It is to Behe's credit that -- pretty much alone -- he has openly admitted the perverse conclusion that ID theory forces concerning the deliberate creation of all dangerous diseases by the Christian God he and most IDers believe in. His attempts to rationalize it away in moral terms are not so admirable or logical. Behe demurs that he is not a theologian, and then acts as one as he casually implies that designer diseases are part of a loving creator's grand project to produce a complex, sometimes dangerous life stage similar to those of Shakespeare, The Narnia Tales, or the Truman Show where humans can do interesting things and be moral agents. In doing so Behe comes across as unable to fully comprehend the moral difference between fictional and factual situations, while making light of the deep horror of the actual world. His comparison of Jesus to the lion Aslan serves to emphasizes how fiercely predatory creation is to its most defenseless citizens, the Truman Show was a fictional comedy in which no child dies, Shakespeare was not in the habit of murdering his performers, and no decent modern society would allow a stage manager to intentionally build lethal devices into a theater set that kill off half the child actors.

Behe at least tries to sound concerned about the killer creator. Dembski, not so much. To him the big plan makes it worthwhile. Dembski opines that even if certain aspect of God's creation are "cruel. What of it? Philosophical theology has abundant resources for dealing with the problem of evil" ( click here) -- aside from being callous, the latter part of the statement is incorrect as will be noted below.

You know better. At least you should. Assuming you earlier agreed that the mass murder of children is never moral, then to remain ethically consistent you have to agree that a creator that has killed billions of kids in a intentional manner is grievously morally defective. Really, there is no excuse for this.   There is no theodist argument than can morally justify the designing of diseases to kill kids that are designed to be vulnerable to the microbes. It is beyond the pale and common decency. To claim that some great plan of the creator justifies the greatest disaster of humanity is the ultimate in moral relativism, the apex of the end justifies the means arguments. If the supernatural producer went to he trouble to craft not just one but an array of diseases it could have chosen not to while leaving youngsters with grossly inadequate defenses, then in practical terms the creator has plotted to wage war on humanity, in legal terms qualifies as a premeditated mass murderer unless the creator is insane, in objective moral terms is maximally vicious and ruthless, and in ethical terms must sensibly be viewed as evil. In is abjectly impossible for the creator deity to have "fine-tuned" our life hostile universe and deadly planet to be a safe habitat for immature humans. And there is no way that the homicidal God is prolife, whether it be opposition to abortion (which is not mentioned in any way in the entire Bible), or even rejecting mass murder (which is endorsed by the Biblical God in certain cases). Nor does the creator particularly care about whether humans have free will, the designer having set up the situation so that the habitat he constructed for humans kills half or more of them off before they are mature enough to decide their eternal fate. Free will theodicy is a dead, dead, dead as are the countless billions of deceased immature H. sapiens.

So if the monotheist intelligent design promoted by Behe, Dembski, Coulter and the Discovery Institute actually is true, then the creator deity has committed premeditated homicide on a mass scale against immature humans. Objectively, the ID God is not merely not moral, it is outright malevolent. It should be put on trial for the greatest crime against humanity. One that dwarfs anything mere mortals have committed.

While Coulter condemns godless progressives for killing millions with their DDT ban, she proudly proclaims her belief in, admiration for, and worship of the designer God that constructed the mosquito borne microbe that has killed billions in the first place. Does Coulter have any clue as to the depth of her hypocrisy? On Bill Maher's Real Time Ann sat erect in her seat and proudly proclaimed that SHE believed in God in an effort to state her moral superiority. Too bad no one on the panel knew enough to expose how her support for Behe's ID theory means she worships a kid killing creator.

- Advertisement -

Of course Coulter is a propagandist. As are IDers in general. In particular, ID is misnamed, and for a reason. Intelligent designers have been trying to pull a fast one. The means of doing so? Intellectual and moral compartmentalization. They try to show that science proves the existence of a super intelligence that had to have designed every single species, but they rarely mention that must mean that God is a disease designer. That would be awkward. Usually when challenged about their religious beliefs IDers almost always wave that away as irrelevant to the science they claim they are doing. That too is convenient because it detaches any thorny moral issues from the supposed scientific proof of a creator. That is an evasive slight of hand because most folks are not all that interested in the existence of just any old creator -- they want a really, really good and just creator of infinite wisdom that will provide aid and comfort during our lives on the planet, followed by endless life in a perfect paradise. After all, how many want the creator to be merely some alien, or an inept or evil creator?

The IDers know that, so they carefully crafted the term intelligent design to mislead. It is a clever propaganda idiom intended to give the impression that the creator that knew enough to meticulously make the universe and all living things has to be profoundly smart and savvy. But the word intelligence has multiple meanings. An ant is more intelligent than a rock, but neither are particularly smart much less moral entities. Stalin was an intelligent bloke, but he was also incredibly stupid to the point of being an evil mass murderer. Ford was brilliant at mass producing automobiles, but he was a stupidly virulent anti-Semite who made the fraudulent and obscure Protocols of the Elders of Zion popular (Ford would later accept a swastika adorned award from Hitler's Reich). Being really, truly intelligent means not only being bright enough to craft sophisticated habitats and biology, but being truly brilliant enough to set up the systems so that they maximize the benefits to the sentient inhabitants, including preserving their lives and comfort while maximizing their freedom of choice. If there is a deliberate designer of the universe and life, then its intelligence is so scandalously marginal that it produced a maximally defective habitat that goes as far as it can to deny humans their comfort, safety and mature free will. Because such a being is inept, sloppy, evil and correspondingly stupid, ID should be accurately relabeled what it truly is, FD (Foolish Design). And the intelligent designer should be known as the foolish designer.  

Most proponents of FD theory hope that its scientific verification of the existence of a creator will revive popular belief in the savior Jesus Christ. But that depends upon perpetually compartmentalizing the issues. As it becomes known that FD requires that the Christian God has gone to lengths to cleverly devise diseases, they will undermine the premise of divine benevolence that the popularity of the faith rests upon.

It is just too good to be true.

Behe as well as Dembski have claimed that theologians have already dealt with the problem of prematurely deceased humans. Not even close. As I document in the P&T study, theodists have bent over backwards to consistently avoid dealing the issue -- and have continued to do so since the paper was published. That's to be expected if not condoned. What is odd is how even the proevolution community has failed to take full advantage of the dark side of the "intelligent" designer that was so foolish that it went to the effort to fashion the astonishingly defective human reproductive tract, the deficient juvenile immune defenses, and murderous microbes behind malaria, smallpox, typhus, cholera, dysentery, plague, measles, influenza, polio, diphtheria, tetanus, rabies, encephalitis, yellow fever, scarlet fever, syphilis, HIV, meningitis, whooping cough, pneumonia".

- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2


Gregory Paul is an independent researcher interested in informing the public about little known yet important aspects of the complex interactions between religion, secularism, culture, economics, politics and societal conditions. His scholarly work (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Can We Please Stop Pretending that Christianity is Anti-Socialism? Please? Pt 2

Libertarian America: What the Ayn-Rand-Paulian Wing of the Tea Party Really Wants the USA to Become

The Understold Story: The Vatican, the Mob, Super Ponzi Schemes and MORE

At Long Last the Catholic Church Must Be Destroyed

Why Clint's Speech Tells Us That the GOP Chastity/Anti-abortion Platform Is a Great Big Scam

Can We Please Stop Pretending that Christianity is Anti-Socialism? Please? Pt 1


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Let us assume that everything you contend is true,... by John Reed on Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:00:23 AM
You are born again and again into this world. Tak... by Mary Wilson on Saturday, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:00:18 AM
Not to forget that this designer God created a mul... by revzef on Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:07:56 PM
Gregory Paul wrote,"You know better. At least you ... by Derryl Hermanutz on Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:44:28 PM