Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

How I Came To Distrust the Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

 From 2001 through most of 2007, I didn't think much about this subject. I had casually wondered if the fires could actually be responsible for bringing the towers down, thinking about the heat and thermodynamics necessary to weaken the steel columns. I have an undergraduate degree in chemistry, and find thermodynamics very interesting. The idea that fires fueled by office materials and jet fuel (enhanced kerosene) could weaken steel beams, resulting in total failure of the entire structure seemed vaguely unlikely. After all, there have been other large steel-structured office building fires that had not resulted in complete, catastrophic collapse, but I didn’t dwell on my vague doubts.

I have since learned there have been no complete, catastrophic collapses of steel-framed buildings due to fire recorded, ever, like these. There have been partial collapses, involving a few floors, and considerable damage due to fire, but no complete collapses ever of steel-framed buildings. On 9/11, we are given to believe there were three.

            In September of last year I read an article on "conspiracy theories" about 9/11, and I learned of the website I wrote about this past October, www.patriotsquestion911.com. This site is nothing more than a compilation of names of people who have publicly questioned the official account, and their statements. It is not an organization, or membership association; the people on the list are not necessarily associated with one another in any way, except for having doubts about 9/11 and having made public statements to that effect. Names on the list include Louis Freeh, former FBI director, Wesley Clark, Ron Paul, Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Sec. Of the Treasury, Curt Weldon, Mary Shiavo, former Inspector General US Dept of Transportation, Col. Robert Bowman, Dennis Kucinich, Morgan Reynolds, former Chief Economist in the Bush Labor Department, with about one thousand other people who have doubts about the official explanation of the 9/11 attacks. A quick look at this list will give you a sense of the caliber and qualifications of those who have spoken out in one way or another about these events.

            Two other names on this list are men I have read extensively in the past four months: Dr. David Ray Griffin, and Dr. Steven E. Jones. Dr. Griffin is a PhD professor emeritus of religion and philosophy at Claremont College in Calif. Dr. Steven Jones is a PhD physicist formerly with Brigham Young. Both have long established academic careers, have published numerous books or articles, and are respected intellectuals in their fields.

            Dr. Jones has well established academic and research credentials for his work with metal-catalyzed fusion. His work has been reproduced and confirmed by independent labs in a couple of countries. Overcoming initial controversy to his findings, his fusion results are now considered the basis for further work. Examining evidence taken from the World Trade Center site he employs the accepted forensic techniques of analysis arson investigators use. He has confirmed a “eutectic” of sulfur in once-molten steel, which a FEMA analysis also found but did not explain, and confirmed the presence of once-molten iron spheres the USGS discovered in dust samples. These samples contain evidence suggestive of explosives: sulfur, aluminum, barium, manganese, with other compounds, in unusually high concentrations.

            Dr. Griffin has exhaustively examined the 9/11 Commission report. Comparing known reports gathered from the news media, from authors, academics, government documents, Dr. Griffin has written extensively on the evidence the Commission focused on in great detail, and the evidence it inexplicably omits. And the devil really is in those details. Many people hold the Commission report in high regard as the most complete investigation of the events of 9/11. Dr. Griffin’s books convincingly show that the evidence in support of the official conspiracy theory received special treatment, while witnesses who brought contrary testimony, along with those who came forward but were ignored, are inexcusably rejected or marginalized, their evidence unreported.

Scant mention is made in the Commission report of the documented meetings of the chief of Pakistani intelligence at the time, General Mahmoud Ahmad, with CIA director Tenet, officials from the Pentagon, the State Department, and National Security Agency from Sept 4 through Sept. 13, 2001. The report completely denies what the Times of India discovered, and which the Wall Street Journal editorialized, “…US authorities sought [Ahmad’s] removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh at the instance of Gen. Mahmoud…” Instead the Commission report states, “…we have seen no evidence that any foreign government – or foreign government official – supplied any funding.”

The back-stories of halted FBI investigations, credible whistleblowers silenced by federal gag orders, FBI field agents’ reports of suspicious behavior ignored, or requests for warrants altered or denied, all make compelling arguments for foreknowledge and complicity by some in the administration. But all these are difficult to prove to the satisfaction of a court of law.

The science, though, is compelling. Pools of flowing molten iron were found under the rubble of the three World Trade Center buildings. They persisted for 100 days. Office material fires simply cannot produce heat to melt steel or iron. Both the National Institute of Standards and Technology and FEMA studies clearly state that fact in their reports, and neither study so much as attempted to answer the question of what caused those pools of molten metal. And then there is Building 7. Not hit by a plane, not substantially damaged by the other collapses, Building 7 fell straight down in the exact same manner as if by controlled demolition. To this day, no official explanation has been issued explaining how this happened.

I no longer have vague doubts. I have important questions. Nearly 3000 people were murdered on September 11, 2001, and even the accused perpetrators have not been brought to justice. I am one of many calling for a new, independent investigation into 9/11. The elaborate cover up we have now is an utter disgrace to this country, and the basis for what many scholars consider near tyranny.

 

Freelance photographer and writer living in Maine.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Science Behind the Theory: An Inside Job

Extreme Temperatures Involved in WTC Collapse

How I Came To Distrust the Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

An Open Letter to The Economist Magazine

Congress Denied Access to Continuity of Government Planning

A Call to the Peace and Justice Movement

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 51 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I think it deserves a better title to attract more... by Jeanette Doney on Saturday, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:51:41 PM
The 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 ... by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Jan 27, 2008 at 3:49:12 AM
It was a bunch off pissed-off Muslims! LOL&nb... by Shallel on Sunday, Jan 27, 2008 at 1:10:46 PM
How did it happen? I am a retired military and kno... by Robert N Smith on Sunday, Jan 27, 2008 at 1:38:50 PM
The Plan:    From deep in the bowel... by Ramon Puga on Sunday, Jan 27, 2008 at 2:47:38 PM
better late than never i guess... welcome to the r... by lev kabalkin on Sunday, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:27:05 PM
True, and I also am trying to write this in such a... by Stephen Demetriou on Monday, Jan 28, 2008 at 8:31:17 AM
I worked on jets too long as a Naval Aviation Elec... by Dave Kisor on Monday, Jan 28, 2008 at 1:34:50 AM
I though that they were titanium.   :)- ... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:04:42 PM
Legally the Mossad is not supposed to be operating... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:09:33 PM
President George W Bush is probably carrying out t... by Anton Grambihler on Monday, Jan 28, 2008 at 2:49:45 PM
After studying the Oklahoma City bombing and its c... by Ingrid on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:59:07 AM
Your claim that building 7 was Not hit by a plane,... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:07:50 PM
Stephan:The idea that fires fueled by office mater... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:12:19 PM
Dr. Jones has well established academic and resear... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:14:24 PM
Dr. Griffin has exhaustively examined the 9/11 Com... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:17:49 PM
I have since learned there have been no complete, ... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:57:25 PM
 Building 7 was not hit by a plane... 3 of 2... by Stephen Demetriou on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 6:06:08 PM
3 of 24 core columns were damaged by the North Tow... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:50:31 AM
Yes, in fact.... by Stephen Demetriou on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:53:26 AM
Gage's list of pretend engineers doesn't c... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:05:51 PM
In other words, the number of firemen who made a d... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:58:38 AM
A clue to the efficacy of the fireproofing comes f... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:05:25 AM
and you have yet to address anything I have said. ... by Stephen Demetriou on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:43:06 AM
Address the issues at hand, if you can. Shooting t... by Stephen Demetriou on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:50:32 AM
We know that the steel components were certified t... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 6:19:21 PM
http://fire-research.group.shef.ac.uk/Downloads/SC... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:03:49 PM
Please answer this question for me, how many steel... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:10:53 AM
And not only that, they showed quite convincingly ... by Stephen Demetriou on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:39:06 AM
Designed for strikes of that very natureThe above ... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:49:21 PM
The question I would like you to answer is: How ma... by Stephen Demetriou on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 1:37:25 PM
How many steel-framed buildings have completely co... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 6:09:42 PM
Sorry, but you still haven't answered even the... by Stephen Demetriou on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 8:03:49 AM
Live load v static load... Seems you are trying to... by Roark Howard on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 1:18:31 PM
Thanks. Actually if you read through the entire th... by Stephen Demetriou on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 1:36:04 PM
This is the most increadibly stupid thing you have... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 6:28:17 PM
was not struck by an airplane. Answer the question... by Stephen Demetriou on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:58:39 AM
It was struck by pieces of WTC q when that buildin... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:02:17 PM
Oh well, you really proved your point, didn't ... by Stephen Demetriou on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:16:29 PM
You are the skeptic here.  May I remind you o... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:53:20 PM
Debunking the idiot:Ross smakdown # 1Ross Smackdow... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 6:24:31 PM
Interesting paper, but not convincing to me. I thi... by Stephen Demetriou on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 8:22:39 AM
Dr. Jones has . . .confirmed the presence of once-... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:43:14 PM
Except there is the problem of where did the energ... by Stephen Demetriou on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 8:35:17 AM
The problem is, there were no "pools' or ... by Roark Howard on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:31:43 AM
except there was. That is the crux of your argumen... by Stephen Demetriou on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:07:30 PM
The molten metal evidence was fabricated to lead p... by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 10:24:22 PM
Doctored photos because of "intensity" a... by Stephen Demetriou on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 7:00:25 AM
Is is inconsistent to remove a photo if a legitima... by Stephen Demetriou on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 7:47:57 AM
Pitting one independent investigator of the cover ... by Stephen Demetriou on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 7:50:38 AM
Always good to hear what the young turks at Randi.... by Stephen Demetriou on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 7:37:53 AM