Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The 60-12 solution

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

The House Democratic leadership recently proposed tying funding of operation to a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.

As is well known, this effort failed.

Apparently, in devising this measure the members of the Democratic caucus expected support from a number of their GOP colleagues.

The number of GOP supporters they expected has been quoted as sixty.

In his stump speeches in Iowa and New Hampshire, Democratic Presidential Candidate Barak Obama has frequently said that the support of 12 GOP Senators is required to pass the antiwar measures that Congressional Democrats advocate.

These two numbers 60 in the House and 12 in the Senate are the basis of the title of this article, the 60-12 solution and are a matter of importance to all anti-war activists.

The events of the spring and the maneuvering around the timetable issue have demonstrated that a Democrat only approach to ending the war is inadequate.

Therefore a bipartisan strategy must be developed.

How can the anti-war movement generate the pressure to motivate 60 GOP representatives and 12 GOP Senators to resist their leaders and support anti-war measures introduced by the Democrats?

First: Focus on ending the war and drop the divisive partisan issues. There are a great many Republicans who view the Occupation and Invasion of Iraq as a massive mistake. A large number of these people are willing to be active in ending the war. Listen to them, seek common ground, and if necessary focus on war resistance only. Two war opponents giving a simple, unified message are far more powerful than two war opponents publicly engaged in an absorbing argument about impeachment or something.

Two: Use the web. Find out who your representatives and senators are and send them frequent messages denouncing the war. Remind them that you will not forget or be dissuaded and that on Election Day their position on the war will determine your vote. Send similar messages to the President and to the GOP party sites. Remind them over and over and over that they are the minority, that they are wrong on the war and that we the people are demanding change.

Three: Support anti-war groups and candidates. Send them money if you can afford to. Otherwise encourage them and strengthen them by signing petitions writing letters and otherwise keeping their voices loud and potent.

Four: Use the press; whether or not your letter to the editor is published it makes an impact. A local newspaper editor told me that he once got over 400 e-mails originating from conservatives nation wide when our local congressman publicly criticized Karl Rove. The Right is sending cards and letters; we need to send them, too. Send a lot.

Five: Be generous with your friends. You may know and respect people who support the war. They have their reasons and they have a right to their opinions, show respect for their views, perhaps they will show the same respect for ours. This will help to convince waverers and will defang some of the opposition.

Six: Be active in your locality’s political and community activities. You will develop a reputation as a serious person and this will add weight and strength to your opinions as you state them.

Seven: Find and support GOP anti-war candidates. I am not advocating that active Democrats sabotage the GOP; after all we have our hands full with our own party. Instead, I am asking Republicans opposed to the war to organize and challenge their leaders and for conservative minded anti-war independents to enroll and to help nominate anti-war Republicans in the upcoming primaries.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Robert Chapman is greatly interested in developing political awareness among as many people as possible.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

State of the Union 07

The GWOT is a failure; demand change now

Come on all you big strong men

Abstinence only instruction

America's spiritual needs

Clinton the strongest candidate on Iraq

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 33 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
You will probably receive comments calling your st... by Todd Huffman, M.D. on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 12:19:53 PM
Dr. Todd Thank you for support and encouragem... by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 12:47:48 PM
Let me repeat after all the philosophical disputat... by Robert Chapman on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 2:00:09 PM
Great article Robert. I want to see it stop too.I ... by goldenequity on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 1:39:16 PM
Peppercorn;thanks for your remarks, looks like I h... by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 1:52:29 PM
developed," you say?You write, "Apparent... by Richard Mynick on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 2:52:25 PM
Greetings and thank you for your remarks.You find ... by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 3:06:14 PM
certain exceedingly debatable assumption... by Richard Mynick on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 8:56:09 PM
Rich,You have made a lot of good points.There are ... by Robert Chapman on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 7:12:12 AM
quite good.Like you, I am also very concerned abou... by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 1:32:17 PM
Rich, thanks for the correction, that's what I... by Robert Chapman on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 1:54:55 PM
You may be "at a loss for words" but I&#... by Charlie L on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 6:22:16 PM
You  can play with your balls and wait for th... by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 8:09:08 PM
is criminal. It's a war crime and a crime agai... by Blue Pilgrim on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 8:00:50 PM
The Iraq invasion and occupation are immoral, brut... by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 8:22:53 PM
"We won't have an election until 08, so i... by Blue Pilgrim on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:13:17 PM
Blue Pilgrim may well be correct in what he says a... by Robert Chapman on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 7:17:47 AM
I'd shut my mouth and be cordial to a neocon d... by Kathlyn Stone on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 9:09:59 PM
The reason I wrote this article is to stimulate di... by Robert Chapman on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 7:30:13 AM
You say "But while you are waiting you m... by Blue Pilgrim on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:36:39 PM
The suffering of the Iraqi people and of the whole... by Robert Chapman on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 7:54:21 AM
"Apparently a long time ago, probably in the ... by Blue Pilgrim on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 2:22:30 PM
The coup against Mossadegh is well known, although... by Robert Chapman on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 9:02:15 PM
(I agree 97% with BluePilgrim.)Invading Iraq was a... by Max Ward on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 5:06:32 PM
Uncle Max, I used your quote in my subject line be... by Robert Chapman on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 9:21:32 PM
"Under your scenario of retreat, why would th... by Blue Pilgrim on Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:12:40 PM
The Arabs have other ways to hurt us than by milit... by Robert Chapman on Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 7:23:04 AM
Your inference -- that I "favor immediate dea... by Max Ward on Thursday, Jun 28, 2007 at 1:29:04 AM
One cannot conduct a conversation with an American... by Robert Chapman on Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 7:46:32 AM
If it were not for the "radicals" (54% t... by Sheila Jackson on Wednesday, Jul 18, 2007 at 9:23:47 PM
Ms. Jackson;with all respect to your anger and sen... by Robert Chapman on Saturday, Jul 21, 2007 at 2:07:51 PM
Mr. Chapman,    I fail to see how m... by Sheila Jackson on Sunday, Jul 29, 2007 at 1:40:52 PM
Dear Ms. Jackson,In this instance, I  you per... by Robert Chapman on Monday, Jul 30, 2007 at 3:54:40 PM