Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
5 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

We All Need Protection from Hate Crimes

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


opednews.com

We All Need Protection from Hate Crimes
Patricia Goldsmith

A group called Faith 2 Action is rallying the troops to shoot down the hate crime extension bill coming before the Senate, possibly as early as June 15. It's sending packets to senators urging them to defeat the bill on the grounds of free speech. The mailing contains a mugshot, fingerprints, a picture of cuffed hands, and the headline "Don't Make Me A Criminal."

Jane Folger of the ministry Faith 2 Action says the hate crimes bill passed by the House is aimed at pastors or anyone else who has the "audacity" to disagree with the homosexual agenda. "Mike is standing at a football bar, or he's standing at a restaurant, watching a game," she posits; "Bruce comes out of the restroom, and he's touching up his makeup. He's a cross-dresser with red nails and a five o'clock shadow. He comes out and hits on Mike. Maybe he puts his arm around him or maybe he brushes or puts his hand through his hair.

The average man would "maybe want to push off such unwelcome advances," Folger observes. However, she warns, "That, if you touch him, is a hate crime."


If you ever wondered why they call it homophobia, now you have an idea. What's next, a congressional mailing of coloring books illustrating the horrors of marriage equality?

It's beyond galling for those of us who actually believe in the First Amendment-even for hate speech-to hear it eulogized by those who gave up even their lip-service to it after 9/11, at about the same time that Ari Fleischer warned "watch what you do, watch what you say."


Those in Congress who warn ominously of thought crimes had no trouble retroactively legalizing the administration's illegal wholesale spying on Americans' telephone conversations and emails-activities which are not exactly conducive to the free and open expression of thoughts. "If you haven't done anything wrong," Bush apologists blandly assert, "you have nothing to fear." Free speech and privacy, as rights and goods in and of themselves, count as nothing.

How many Republicans who are now making impassioned arguments defending free speech came to the defense of the Dixie Chicks when their CDs were being pitched into bonfires and Clear Channel put them on a no-play list? How many work tirelessly to get "inappropriate" books off library shelves?

How many seconds pass before Bill O'Reilly tells an opponent to shut up and/or cuts her mic?

More importantly, how many movement conservatives protesting the new hate crime bill on free speech grounds heckled, harassed, and shouted down anyone who had the temerity to point out the administration's transparent lies as we marched into Iraq? Free speech doesn't mean much when you can't be heard. Or seen-how many objected to the creation of "free speech zones" that pen peaceful demonstrators far from the person or place they're protesting?

Far from believing in an equal, open exchange of ideas, the religious and political right believe very strongly that they have a lock on absolute truth; they disparage intellectual humility, tolerance, and evidence-based decision-making as "moral relativism." These attitudes have eroded public support for all human rights, not just the right to free speech.

Most notable in that regard is the Bush administration's notion of the unitary executive, which gives the president unprecedented power to declare citizens "enemy combatants" and strip them of all rights, including the right to physical safety-the ultimate penalty enhancement. During a recent debate among Republican presidential candidates, every one of them, with the honorable exception of Representative Ron Paul, eagerly endorsed the Guantanamo detention center and the torturing of suspects.

The audience's thunderous applause was chilling. Cruelty has become anonymous, sanitized: respectable.

The other argument conservatives make against penalty enhancements is that they undermine the concept of equal protection under the law. According to this thinking, it would be un-American to add an additional terrorist penalty to the sentences of abortion clinic bombers, for example-and as far as I know, no pro-life murderers have had such a penalty added to their sentences.

Yet when Judge James Cohn handed down a five-year sentence for Stephen Jordi for attempted fire-bombing of a reproductive health clinic, he added, "I have grave concerns regarding the future dangerousness of Mr. Jordi." The prosecution argued that the remorseless Jordi should be sentenced as a terrorist, which would have doubled his sentence, but Cohn argued that under the law domestic acts could not be considered terrorism.

Unfortunately, Cohn's legal scruples have not prevented an Oregon judge from sentencing two eco-activists as terrorists recently. This is the natural outcome of an FBI decision to designate environmental and animal rights activists as the leading domestic terrorist threats, in spite of the fact that there has never been a life lost in any action taken by those groups. Unlike abortion clinic bombers, environmental and animal activists have made the preservation of human life a priority.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Patricia Goldsmith is a member of Long Island Media Watch, a grassroots free media and democracy watchdog group. She can be reached at plgoldsmith@optonline.net.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Patriarchy: The Next Generation

Greenwave

False Frames

Who Is the Enemy?

Scandalology 101

Hate By Any Other Name

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I oppose federal hate crimes laws because they vio... by Josh Purinton on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 12:43:10 AM
If someone kills a family member of mine, It shoul... by USPatriot36 on Saturday, Jun 9, 2007 at 8:23:55 AM
The Hate Crime bill covers people with disabilitie... by Alison Hymes on Saturday, Jun 9, 2007 at 9:54:28 AM
Unmentioned was the 14th amendment: equal protecti... by johndoraemi on Saturday, Jun 9, 2007 at 10:05:23 PM
What can be a greater hate-crime than declaring wa... by Geraldo on Sunday, Jun 10, 2007 at 1:56:28 PM