Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment, 2 series

OpEdNews Op Eds

Putin's Proposal: A Deal Too Good to Pass Up

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

opednews.com

This comment originally appeared in the Russia Profile Weekly Experts Panel (June 15, 2007)

A Deal Too Good to Pass Up.

President Putin's proposal to jointly run the early warning radar site at Gabala in Azerbaijan has several advantages for the United States. Indeed, it is a deal too good to pass up.

Its 6,000 kilometer range will allow the United States to monitor the Middle East, China, South Asia, India, and much of Africa – all the places from which rogue missile attacks are likely to originate. It is a currently functioning station, with a ten year renewable lease, which means that the US can entirely side step the local hostility and legal issues that inevitably ensue with the creation of new bases in Europe.

Azerbaijan and Iran have already said that they do not see American participation in such a joint endeavor as a threat, so that collaborating with Russia will enhance American security without provoking any further anger in the region (a rare feat indeed!). Finally, even the site's closeness to the Iran, a cause of concern to some analysts, has its silver lining. Although less precise than the newest American radars, the fact that Gabala is so much closer to potential launch sites allows it to detect missiles and plot their trajectory within seconds. According to former defense minister Sergei Ivanov, it can even detect the launch of cruise missiles.

These unique advantages permit the issue of tracking to be separated from the issue of interception (as it should be), and allow for a mutually advantageous compromise: by using a Russian radar to track missiles that can then be shot down by interceptors located elsewhere, Russia is ensured that the radar is not undermining its defenses, by tracking missiles deep inside Russia, while the United States maintains complete independence in its response capability.


There are some long term benefits to consider as well. The first is that it would give the Pentagon a foothold in the region's most oil-rich state, one whose favor US officials have long curried. Another is that it would encourage much needed Confidence Building Measures in the area of missile defense. More than anything else it is lack of trust that has thwarted real cooperation on this issue, which both sides agree is of vital importance to them. A joint defense mission will, obviously, force such cooperation.

The problem: the Russians thought of it first. That suffices for Russia-haters to nix the idea, but serious analysts should ask themselves whether they really want to dismiss a proposal so advantageous to the United States just because Putin proposed it? Putin's offer to link American and Russian missile defense systems could be a win-win scenario: allowing the United States to obtain a functional system almost perfectly suited to its needs now, while at the same time making Russia a stakeholder in European security. If properly nurtured by future Russian, American, and European administrations, this proposal could become a model for future arms control initiatives that move beyond linking defense systems, to the linkage of defense strategies.

Putin's innovative proposal forces us to look at security issues anew, in a decidedly post-Cold War light, by asking: "How much is Russia's goodwill worth to us?" If, as President Bush has repeatedly said, Russia is truly welcome to participate in ABM defense, then the superiority of the Gabala option makes the choice obvious. If, however, the United States goes ahead unilaterally, despite the fact that its alternative will not be immediately effective and will raise considerable hackles, both in the Middle East and in NATO, then those who argue that those words were merely rhetoric, will see their analysis confirmed.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Give US and Russia a Chance to Work Together on Missile Defense

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Nicolai N. Petro is professor of political science at the University of Rhode Island. He has served as special assistant for policy in the U.S. State Department (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Russia Can't Be Manipulated Through External Pressure

Ukraine: Why Culture Matters

What the Tagliavini Report Fails to Consider

Russia's New Cyberwarriors

Europe needs Russia and Ukraine together

Conflict Unfrozen: One Year After the Russo-Georgian War

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
We do not even discuss if the US has a right to &#... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 9:11:20 AM