OpEdNews Op Eds

Presidential Directives and Executive Orders

By Marti Oakley  Posted by Barbara Peterson (about the submitter)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Presidential signing statements have never been as abused as they have under the current administration. Signing statements are instructions to all officials of the Executive Branch not to enforce particular provisions of the bill being signed. 

In the case of this president, these provisions are generally those which do not give him unfettered power, or that do not facilitate the Security & Prosperity Partnership or any of the other egregious agreements he has entered into, or those that attempt to hinder the progress of the new fascist state being created.

I would like to know what gives the president the right to declare that he has the power to decide that he does not have to abide by the law. 

More damaging than the signing statements are Executive orders and Presidential directives. These two instruments have become the means by which the executive writes his own laws and avoids congress altogether. 

Here are a few Executive orders you might find amusing:  

• 11000: Allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.  

• 11004: Allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations. 

• 11921: Allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and flow of money in the U.S.A. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. 

Now what could Bush possibly have had in mind when he issued these orders?   

Even far more frightening are Presidential Directives and of particular interest are National Security Presidential Directive NSPD51 and, Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20.   

Reading from the White House spin page you could come to the conclusion that these directives showed some forethought and that contingency plans were in place to protect our sovereign nation in a time of crisis. You could think that; right up to the very last line of the page, which says that the actual annexes of the directives have been classified, so you can’t know what they really say.  

I fully understand the need to keep many things under cover for security reasons. But, when I combine these directives with executive orders listed in the Federal Register [see chart] and the defiance of signing statements, I can see a pattern emerging that has less to do with national security and continuity of government than it does with laying the groundwork for dissolving our Constitutional government and implementing a dictatorship. All for our own good of course.

I have come to the conclusion that when GW Bush crowed about being tough on security he wasn’t actually talking about us or our country as a whole. We just assumed he was. I believe he was actually speaking to his neo-con base, attempting to reassure them that there was no law he would not break or disregard, and no action he would not take to secure the coming North American Union even if it meant openly turning on the common citizens of the United States.  

In all of this, I have to wonder yet again where our Supreme Court is. They had no problem interfering in a national election when they had no constitutional right to do so, but have remained quiet and compliant, as this president they selected has written his own laws and broken or ignored many others.  

And where is our congress? This branch of government has ceded so much of its authority to this president in violation of the delegation of powers in the Constitution and has not acted once to repeal any of these power-grabbing provisions penned by Bush. 

To add insult to injury, VP Dick Cheney has now declared himself not to be part of the Executive branch. Well, if he isn’t….why is he called the Vice President and why is he allowed to conduct business in the name of that office?  

Looking at each of these issues as isolated items makes each seem, not too important. It’s when you start comparing them and adding up the overall effect that the alarms start going off.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Call to Boycott Monsanto - Seminis Seeds

Monsanto's Global Pollution Legacy

America's Silent Killing Fields - 2009 Update

GMO and Morgellon's Disease

HCR 6 - New Hampshire Affirms States Rights

Death by Multiple Poisoning, Glyphosate and Roundup

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I have studied this also and concur that we no lon... by tom storey on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:34:09 PM
You wrote:"These orders and directives were d... by Barbara Peterson on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2008 at 4:29:00 PM