Why is he speaking as we face global financial collapse?
Did you EVER, in your lifetime expect to see the following headline? Did you think people could be THIS deluded and INSANE??
Pre-emptive nuclear strike a key option, Nato told
Ian Traynor in Brussels
Tuesday January 22, 2008
The west must be ready to resort to a pre-emptive nuclear attack to try to halt the "imminent" spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto for a new Nato by five of the west's most senior military officers and strategists.
it says in paragraph one of the article - can someone tell me how this is "RADICAL" This is INSANE THINKING and ought to have been reported as such.
"We must use nuclear weapons to prevent their use." is their western military's BATTLE CRY in a world weary of war.
What happens, as with Iraq or Iran, we have crazies making wild accusations but no evidence: Is "first use" against an illusion defendable?
No, it's a war crime.
These people are retarded: They - the Bush-crazed global war on terror people- would have us believe they can't figure out how to save e-mails that they cannot obey federal laws to hang onto important evidence to avoid the torture of American/western troops and the troops of American allies; but they want to use nuclear weapons to save peace.
War is peace.
We fought for nuclear non proliferation -- now all that is to be undone!!
Calling for root-and-branch reform of Nato and a new pact drawing the US, Nato and the European Union together in a "grand strategy" to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world, the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands insist that a "first strike" nuclear option remains an "indispensable instrument" since there is "simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world"
Did you, dear reader, think that Report from Iron Mountain was a hoax, it was NOT. I suggest you have a right good read of it, because following Sibel Edmonds SENSATIONAL revelations - the PTB have felt compelled to have this Guardian article written to scare the sh*t out of you and to induce you to just GIVE UP.
The manifesto has been written following discussions with active commanders and policymakers, many of whom are unable or unwilling to publicly air their views. It has been presented to the Pentagon in Washington and to Nato's secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, over the past 10 days. The proposals are likely to be discussed at a Nato summit in Bucharest in April.
So much for Robert Gates and Condeleeza Rice's new "benevolent face" in setting war policy as suggested in the Boston Globe recently. Dick Cheney has been "off the radar" - now we know what he's been up to. Have a read about what Gates said after the release on the NIE report on Iran. Now have a read of what was released by one of Project Mockingbird's US journalists just an hour ago (1/22/008) saying how Gates is spanking NATO - Yeah, right.
All anarchist hands in Europe were already discussing the Bucharst protest of Nato in Bucharest - they are fed up waiting on Americans to mobilize You can read comment here. You may care to visit the Website, contra hypen doxa dot com. Indeed what would a global mobilization against NATO look like !!??
"The risk of further [nuclear] proliferation is imminent and, with it, the danger that nuclear war fighting, albeit limited in scope, might become possible," the authors argued in the 150-page blueprint for urgent reform of western military strategy and structures. "The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction."